Psicodebate https://dspace.palermo.edu/ojs/index.php/psicodebate <p class="p1"><strong>Psicodebate</strong> is an open access semiannual (june 1st and december 1st) scientific journal published by the Social Sciences Faculty of Universidad de Palermo. The papers published in Psicodebate cover topics of Psychology and other social and human sciences. Our goal is to communicate the current debates and the latest scientific findings in these topics.</p> <p class="p1">We receive papers in spanish and in english that address psychology issues (treatment, assessment, therapy, theory, diagnosis, among others) and other social and human sciences (sociology, psychiatry, among others). Types of articles accepted are those propose by the American Psychological Association (APA): empirical studies, literature reviews, theoretical articles, methodological articles, case studies. Empirical articles will be preferred.</p> <p class="p2">Submitted papers go through an objective double-bind peer review process in which they are confidentially assessed by experts. The double-blind process guarantees objective judgements. Reviewers informed about the quality of the paper and recommend it to be accepted or rejected. Articles may be directly accepted, accepted with revisions required (major/minor) or rejected. Reviewing process usually takes up to 8 weeks. With this digital edition on Open Journal System we embrace the promotion of open access to scientific publishing nationally and internationally. Open access allows for a greater interchange among professionals and, in consequence, an increment in scientific knowledge. The rejection rate in 2024 was 60%.</p> <p class="p2">Psicodebate meets the iberoamerica normative for academic journals proposed by Latindex adopted by CAICYT-CONICET in Argentina. Psicodebate in included in <strong>Scielo (Scientific Electronic Library Online)</strong>, in&nbsp;the <strong>Basic Core of Scientific Publications</strong> (National Scientific&nbsp;and Technical&nbsp;Research Council,&nbsp;CONICET),&nbsp;<strong>Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science)</strong>, <strong>ERIH Plus&nbsp;</strong>(European Reference Index for the Humanities&nbsp;and Social Sciences),&nbsp;<strong>Latindex</strong>,&nbsp;<strong>DIALNET</strong>,&nbsp;<strong>REDIB</strong>&nbsp;(Red Iberomamericana de Innovación y Conocimiento Científico),&nbsp;<strong>DOAJ</strong>&nbsp;(Directory of Open Access Journals) and&nbsp;<strong>Google Scholar</strong>.</p> <p><strong>INDEXATIONS:</strong></p> <p><img src="/ojs/public/site/images/revistapsicodebate/Scielo1.png"><img src="/ojs/public/site/images/revistapsicodebate/NucleoBasico1.png"><img src="/ojs/public/site/images/revistapsicodebate/GoogleScholar5.jpg"></p> <p><strong>DATA BASES:</strong></p> <p><img src="/ojs/public/site/images/revistapsicodebate/logowos_copia6.png"><img src="/ojs/public/site/images/revistapsicodebate/logo4.png"><img src="/ojs/public/site/images/revistapsicodebate/REDIB5.png"></p> <p><strong>DIRECTORIES:</strong></p> <p><img src="/ojs/public/site/images/revistapsicodebate/logo_cropped2.jpg"> <img src="/ojs/public/site/images/revistapsicodebate/logo3.jpg"> <img src="/ojs/public/site/images/revistapsicodebate/latindex-650x230-300x1075.jpg"></p> es-ES <p>Authors who publish with this journal agree to grant Psicodebate&nbsp;copyright and right of publication and accept the work being &nbsp;licensed under a&nbsp;<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" target="_new">Creative Commons Attribution License</a>&nbsp;that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authors and Psicodebate.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> psicodebate@palermo.edu (Alejandro Castro Solano, PhD) psicodebate@palermo.edu (Guadalupe de la Iglesia, PhD) Mon, 02 Jun 2025 11:46:10 +0000 OJS 3.1.2.1 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Emotional and behavioral problems in premature children of preschool age who live in conditions of social vulnerability in Tucumán https://dspace.palermo.edu/ojs/index.php/psicodebate/article/view/11042 <p>The objective of this research was to analyze the behavioral and emotional problems of 60 children from 2 to 5 years of age, of both sexes, born prematurely and at term, who belong to families in conditions of social vulnerability in the province of Tucumán. The Child Behavior Check List (CBCL) was used from 1 year and 6 months to 5 years and 11 months (Achenbach &amp; Rescorla, 2001), a standardized instrument to record behavioral and emotional problems, considering as a theoretical framework, the applied Child Psychological Evaluation and the model of child psychopathology. The results of this study indicate a higher prevalence of emotional problems, both internalizing and externalizing, in children who were born preterm compared to their full-term peers. These data allow early identification of risk factors to implement effective and timely intervention strategies.</p> Melina Elizabeth Ponce, Claudia Paola Coronel Copyright (c) 2025 Psicodebate https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://dspace.palermo.edu/ojs/index.php/psicodebate/article/view/11042 Sun, 01 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0000 A new experimental paradigm for an old problem: Does our memory retrieve distant analogs or superficial matches more easily? https://dspace.palermo.edu/ojs/index.php/psicodebate/article/view/11628 <p>Traditional laboratory studies show that memory items from long-term memory that share isolated entities and actions with working memory items (surface matches) are more easily retrieved than those that share only a system of abstract relations (distant analogues). More recent naturalistic studies show, however, exactly opposite results. In this work we seek to resolve this paradox through a paradigm that combines the ecological validity of naturalistic studies with the methodological control of experimental ones. We presented participants with a story that maintained superficial similarities to one popular film and structural similarities to another one. Through this method we retained from the naturalistic approach the inclusion of deeply processed base analogues, as well as the contextual and temporal separation between the learning phase and the retrieval phase. At the same time, we retain from the laboratory approach the equiprobability of retrieving distant analogues and superficial matches, as well as the possibility of distinguishing between retrieved analogues and invented ones. The results showed that superficial matches are retrieved to a much greater extent than distant analogues, suggesting that our memory does not fit an ideal information search design.</p> Ricardo Adrián Minervino, Luciana Ceccacci Sawicki, Juan Máximo Trench Copyright (c) 2025 Psicodebate https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://dspace.palermo.edu/ojs/index.php/psicodebate/article/view/11628 Sun, 01 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0000 Psychometric properties of the Gaudiebility Scale for adults of Morelia in the prison population https://dspace.palermo.edu/ojs/index.php/psicodebate/article/view/11335 <p>Gaudiebility is defined as the set of modulators that regulate the enjoyment experienced; a scale was recently generated that showed adequate psychometric properties in the general population. However, psychometric properties have not been studied in Persons Deprived of Liberty (PDL). Therefore, the objective of this work was to study the internal structure and reliability of the Gaudiebility Scale for Adults of Morelia (GSAM) in PDL. The GSAM was administered to a sample of 2,048 PDL aged between 18 and 81 years (<em>M</em> = 35.7, <em>SD</em> = 10.2). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was applied to the polychoric correlation matrix, using the Diagonal Weighted Least Squares (DWLS) estimation method and robust standard errors. Likewise, for the reliability study, Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega indices were used. The results highlight that the CFA partially corroborated, χ²<sub>(169)</sub> = 947.17, p &lt; .001, CFI= .97, TLI = .96, RMSEA = .07, SRMR= .06, the model of six related factors of the GSAM. The internal consistency indices of the factors (alpha values ​​ranged from .75 to .65 and omega values ​​from .76 to .67) and of the total scale (Cronbach's alpha of .80 and a McDonald’s omega of .67) were acceptable. Descriptive data is also offered in PDL of Michoacan (Mexico). It is concluded that the GSAM is adequate to evaluate gaudiebility in PDL adults.</p> Laura Olivia Amador Zavala, Ferran Padrós Blázquez, Oscar Ulises Reynoso González, María Patricia Martínez Medina Copyright (c) 2025 Psicodebate https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://dspace.palermo.edu/ojs/index.php/psicodebate/article/view/11335 Sun, 01 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0000 Can character strengths be relate to adjustment to college? A research in Students of the Metropolitan Area and Greater Buenos Aires https://dspace.palermo.edu/ojs/index.php/psicodebate/article/view/11626 <p>This is a cross-sectional, descriptive, and correlational study conducted with 339 university students from the Metropolitan Area of Buenos Aires, with an average age of 27 years. The study aimed to evaluate the relationship between university adaptation across four dimensions (academic, social, personal-emotional, and institutional) and character strengths according to the Values in Action classification. The Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire (SACQ) and the Inventory of Virtues and Strengths (IVyF) were used. The results indicated that the institutional dimension, related to the acceptance of norms and motivation to complete the degree, was the highest, while emotional adaptation, associated with the ability to manage stress and personal challenges, was the lowest. The most prominent character strengths were kindness and perspective, while self-regulation and spirituality had the lowest means. Significant correlations were also found between university adaptation and certain character strengths, with vitality, persistence, social intelligence, and gratitude being associated with three or four dimensions of university adaptation simultaneously. These findings suggest that these strengths may play a crucial role in university adaptation.</p> Aldana Sol Grinhauz, Sergio Héctor Azzara, Cynthia Claudia Frascaroli, Melina Gabriela Elkouss Copyright (c) 2025 Psicodebate https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://dspace.palermo.edu/ojs/index.php/psicodebate/article/view/11626 Sun, 01 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0000 Preliminary Validation of the CAPEMI-E Scale in an Adolescent Sample from Fray Bentos, Uruguay https://dspace.palermo.edu/ojs/index.php/psicodebate/article/view/11542 <p>Positive traits are enduring and valued positive human characteristics that manifest themselves in thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. One way to study positive traits is through a psycholexical approach. This type of approach investigates individual differences in positive traits that are encoded in the natural language of the subjects. An instrument derived from this approach is the CAPEMI-E, made in the Argentine population and whose structure of positive traits is made up of the following traits: Erudition; Joviality; Honesty; Peacefulness; Spirituality; Tenacity. The aim of this study was to validate the CAPEMI-E in Uruguayan adolescents. In addition, individual differences in these traits were analyzed as a function of gender and age. Data were collected from 400 adolescents from Fray Bentos, Uruguay. It was found that the original structure of six positive traits was not replicated. Instead, a five-trait structure was presented: Erudition, Joviality, Honesty, Peacefulness, and Spirituality with high levels of internal consistency (alphas/omegas = .66/.84). Females showed higher levels than males in the trait Honesty, and that Erudition, Peace and Honesty were the traits with the highest presence in adolescents over 16 years of age. The CAPEMI-E has proven to be a valid and reliable tool to measure positive traits in Uruguayan youth. This is particularly relevant given that positive traits play a key role in the mental health and well-being of adolescents.</p> Andrés Buschiazzo, Vanesa Góngora Copyright (c) 2025 Psicodebate https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://dspace.palermo.edu/ojs/index.php/psicodebate/article/view/11542 Sun, 01 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0000