La Arquitectura como campo compartido y evolutivo de coexistencia creativa Experimental practice

  • Aleksandra Raonic
Palabras clave: Métodos, pedagogías de diseño experimental

Resumen

La práctica experimental comienza con la premisa de que el conocimiento del diseño arquitectónico no se elabora a partir de hechos estáticos e invariables. 

Citas

Abrahamson, D. (2015). Reinventing learning: A design-research odyssey. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(6), pp. 1013-1026.

Akin, Ö and Lin, C (1996). Design Protocol Data and Novel Design Decisions.

Archer, B. (1981). A View of the Nature of Design Research. En R. Jacques and J. Powell, eds., Design. Science. Method. Guildford: Westbury House / IPC Science and Technology Press.

Aubin, C., Mi´nguez Carrasco, C., & Goldberg, R. (2019). Bodybuilding: Architecture and performance. C. Aubin and C. Mínguez Carrasco, eds. [foreword by R. Goldberg].

Colomina, B. et al. (2022). Radical pedagogies. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Colomina, B., & Wigley, M. (2016). Are we human? Notes on an archaeology of design. Zurich: Lars Müller Publishers.

Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. Dordrecht, Londres: Springer.

Cross, N. et al. (eds.). Analysing Design Activity, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Cross, N. (1999, Verano). Design Research: A Disciplined Conversation. Design Issues, 15(2), Design Research. The MIT Press, pp. 5-10.

De Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Dewey, J. (1930). The Quest for Certainty. Londres: George Allen and Unwin.

Dewey, J. (1934). Art as Experience. Nueva York: Perigee Books.

Foucault, M. (1994). The Order of Things an Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Nueva York: Vintage Press.

Foucault, M. (1980). Theatrum Philosophicum. En D. Bouchard, ed., Language, CounterMemory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Ithaca, Nueva York: Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501741913-009.

Giddens, A. (1986). The Constitution of Society. Oxford: Polity Press.

Goldberg, R. (1998). Performance: live art since the 60s. Londres: Thames and Hudson.

Harrison, A. (1978). Making and Thinking. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press.

Haraway, D. (1991). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. En D. Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs and Women, Londres: Free Association Books.

Leach, N. (2006). Camouflage. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

McPeck, J.E. (1981). Critical Thinking and Education. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). In Praise of Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Moor. C. (1977). Foreword. En In Praise of Shadows, Junichiro Tanizaki. Connecticut: Leete’s Island Books.

Pallasmaa, J. (2005). Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. Chichester: Wiley-Academy.

Parlett, M. (1991). Reflections on field theory. British Gestalt Journal, 1(1), pp. 68-91.

Parlett, M., & Lee, R. (eds.). (2005). Contemporary Gestalt Therapy: Field Theory. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452225661.

Raonic, A. (2021). TOI.NTNU.CEPT. https://www.instagram.com/toi.ntnu.cept/.

Raonic, A. (2022). Experimental practice - AAR4612 course report, https://innsida.ntnu.no/studiekvalitetsportalen/emner/AAR4612.

Rittel, H.W.J., & Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), pp. 155-169.

Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Nueva York: Basic Books. (Reimpresión 1995).

Schön, D.A. (1987a). Educating the reflective practicioner. Washington: American Educational Research Association.

Schön, D.A. (1987b). Educating the reflective practicioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Schön, D.A. (1988). Designing: Rules, types and worlds. Design Studies, 9(3), pp. 181-190.

Schön, D.A. (1992). Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 5(1), pp. 3-14.

Schön, D.A., & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies, 13(2), pp. 135-156.

Simon, H.A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (1969). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Simon, C., & Mobekk, H. (2019). Dugnad: A Fact and a Narrative of Norwegian Prosocial Behavior. Perspect Behav. Sci. 42, pp. 815-834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00227-w.

Sloterdijk, P. (2006, Junio). Architektur als Immersionskunst. Arch+, 178, pp. 58-63.

Till, J. (2009). Architecture depends. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Tschumi, B. (2008, Agosto). Citado en D. Hannah y O. Khan, Performance/Architecture: An Interview with Bernard Tschumi, Journal of Architectural Education, 4(61), pp. 52-58.

Dwyre, C., Perry, C., & Tschumi, B. (2015). Architecture Beyond Architecture. PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art, 37(1), pp. 8-15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26386736.
Publicado
2024-04-24
Cómo citar
Raonic, A. (2024). La Arquitectura como campo compartido y evolutivo de coexistencia creativa Experimental practice. Cuadernos Del Centro De Estudios De Diseño Y Comunicación, (220). https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi220.11151