Neuroarquitectura: Mejorar el bienestar y la productividad a través del diseño espacial
Palabras clave:
Neuroarquitectura, Neurociencia
Resumen
En un mundo cada vez más acelerado y urbanizado, los espacios que habitamos tienen un profundo impacto en nuestro bienestar y productividad.
Citas
1. Karakas, T., & Yildiz, D. (2020). Exploring the influence of the built environment on human experience through a neuroscience approach: a systematic review. Front. Archit. Res., 9, pp. 236-247. doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2019.10.005.
2. Eberhard, J.P. (2009b). Brain Landscape the Coexistence of Neuroscience and Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Eberhard, J.P. (2009a). Applying neuroscience to architecture. Neuron, 62, pp. 753-756. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.001.
4. Ezzat Ahmed, D., & Kamel, S. (2021). Exploring the contribution of neuroarchitecture in learning environments design “a review”. Int. J. Archit. Eng. Urban Res., 4, pp. 102-119. doi: 10.2478/dfl-2014-0018.
5. Fazio, M.W., Moffett, M., & Wodehouse, L. (2008). A World History of Architecture. Londres: Laurence King.
6. Pollio, V. (1914). Vitruvius, the Ten Books on Architecture. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
7. Fazio, M.W., Moffett, M., & Wodehouse, L. (2008). A World History of Architecture. Londres: Laurence King.
8. Rutherford, I. (ed.) (2016). Greco-Egyptian Interactions: Literature, Translation, and Culture, 500 BCE-300 CE. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Stendhal (2010). Rome, Naples and Florence. Alma Books.
10. Frascari, M. (1983). “The tell-the-tale detail”. En Semiotics 1981, J. N. Deely (ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Springer, pp. 325-336. doi: 10.5840/cpsem198115.
11. Frampton, K. (1985). Studies in Tectonic Culture. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Graduate School of Design Cambridge.
12. Charytonowicz, J. (2000). Architecture and ergonomics. En Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 44 (33). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, pp. 6-103. doi: 10.1177/154193120004403305.
13. Dodds, G.P. (2000). Landscape and Garden in the Work of Carlo Scarpa. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
14. Ruiz-Arellano, M. (2015, Mayo). Hawaiian Healing Center: A Weaving of Neuro-Architecture and Cultural Practices. Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
15. Gramann, K., Gwin, J.T., Ferris, D.P., Oie, K., Jung, T.P., Lin, C.T., et al. (2011). Cognition in action: imaging brain/body dynamics in mobile humans. Rev. Neurosci. 22, pp. 593- 608. doi: 10.1515/RNS.2011.047.
16. Gramann, K., McKendrick, R., Baldwin, C., Roy, R.N., Jeunet, C., Mehta, R.K., et al. (2021). Grand field challenges for cognitive neuroergonomics in the coming decade. Front. Neuroergonom. 2(6). doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2021.643969.
17. Oppenheim, I., Mühlmann, H., Blechinger, G., Mothersill, I.W., Hilfiker, P., Jokeit, H., et al. (2009). Brain electrical responses to high-and low-ranking buildings. Clin. EEG Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 40, pp. 157-161. doi: 10.1177/155005940904000307.
18. Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L.B., Gonzalez-Mora, J.L., Leder, H., et al. (2015). Architectural design and the brain: effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure on beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions. J. Environ. Psychol. 41, pp. 10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.006.
19. Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L.B., Leder, H., Modroño, C., et al. (2013). Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 110 (Suppl. 2), pp. 10446-10453. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.1301227110.
20. Kirk, U., Skov, M., Hulme, O., Christensen, M.S., & Zeki, S. (2009b). Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 44, pp. 1125-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.009.
21. Shemesh, A., Leisman, G., Bar, M., & Grobman, Y. J. (2021). A neurocognitive study of the emotional impact of geometrical criteria of architectural space. Archit. Sci. Rev., 64, pp. 394-407.
22. Martínez-Soto, J., Gonzales-Santos, L., Pasaye, E., & Barrios, F.A. (2013). Exploration of neural correlates of restorative environment exposure through functional magnetic resonance. Intell. Build. Int., 5, pp. 10-28. doi: 10.1080/17508975.2013.807765>.
23. Fich, L.B., Jönsson, P., Kirkegaard, P.H., Wallergård, M., Garde, A.H., & Hansen, Å (2014). Can architectural design alter the physiological reaction to psychosocial stress? a virtual TSST experiment. Physiol. Behav., 135, pp. 91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.034.
24. Chen et al., 2016.
25. Chen, Z., Schulz, S., He, X., & Chen, Y. (2016). A pilot experiment on affective multiple biosensory mapping for possible application to visual resource analysis and smart urban landscape design. REAL CORP 2016, CORP - Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning.
26. Andreassi, J.L. (2001). Psychophysiology: human behavior and physiological response. J. Psychophysiol., 40(1), pp. 89-91.
27. Erkan, I. (2018). Examining wayfinding behaviours in architectural spaces using brain imaging with electroencephalography (EEG). Architect. Sci. Rev., 61, pp. 410-428
28. Hollander J.B., & Foster, V. (2016a). Brain responses to architecture and planning: a preliminary neuro-assessment of the pedestrian experience in Boston, Massachusetts. Architect. Sci. Rev., 59, pp. 474-481.
29. Hollander, J.B., et al. (2019). Seeing the city: using eye-tracking technology to explore cognitive responses to the built environment. J. Urban. Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustain., 12, pp. 156-171.
30. Kambli, I., et al. (2018). Wellness by design: thoughts on reshaping Brussels’ public realm. J. Urban Des. Ment. Heal., 5, p. 13.
31. Crick, F.H. (1979). Thinking about the brain. Scientific American, 241(3), pp. 219-232.
32. Evans, G.W. (2003). The built environment and mental health. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 80(4), pp. 536-555.
33. Fink, G. (2016). Stress, definitions, mechanisms, and effects outlined: Lessons from anxiety. En G. Fink (ed.), Stress: Concepts, cognition, emotion, and behavior, pp. 3-11. Elsevier Academic Press.
34. Fox, P.T., & Friston, K.J. (2012). Distributed processing; distributed functions? NeuroImage, 61(2), pp. 407-426.
35. Kirsch, L.P., Urgesi, C., & Cross, E.S. (2016). Shaping and reshaping the aesthetic brain: Emerging perspectives on the neurobiology of embodied aesthetics. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 62, pp. 56-68.
36. Lambert, G.W., Reid, C., Kaye, D.M., Jennings, G.L., & Esler, M.D. (2002).
37. Selye, H. (1936). A Syndrome produced by Diverse Nocuous Agents. Nature, 138(32).
38. Selye, H. (1974). Stress without distress. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co. Gibson, (1966).
39. Shan, Z.Y., Liu, J.Z., Sahgal, V., Wang, B., & Yue, G.H. (2005). Selective atrophy of left hemisphere and frontal lobe of the brain in old men. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 60(2), pp. 165-174.
40. Savic, I. (2015). Structural changes of the brain in relation to occupational stress. Cerebral Cortex (Nueva York: 1991), 25(6), pp. 1554-1564.
41. Strimbu, K., & Tavel, J.A. (2010). What are biomarkers?, 5(6), pp. 463-466.
42. https://behnazfarahi.com/synapse/.
43. Niezabitowska, E. (2018). Research Methods and Techniques in Architecture. Routledge.
44. Szabo, S., Tache, Y., & Somogyi, A. (2012). The legacy of Hans Selye and the origins of stress research: a retrospective 75 years after his landmark brief “letter” to the editor# of Nature. Stress (Amsterdam), 15(5), pp. 472-478.
45. Tan, S.Y., & Yip, A. (2018). Hans Selye (1907-1982): Founder of the stress theory. Singapore Medical Journal, 59(4), pp. 170-171
46. Vive, S., Af Geijerstam, J.L., Kuhn, H.G., & Bunketorp-Käll, L. (2020). Enriched, TaskSpecific Therapy in the Chronic Phase After Stroke: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy: JNPT, 44(2), pp. 145-155.
47. Aftanas, L., & Golocheikine, S. (2001). Human anterior and frontal midline theta and lower alpha reflect emotionally positive state and internalized attention: high-resolution EEG investigation of meditation. Neurosci. Lett., 310, pp. 57-60. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02094-8.
48. Barrett, L.F., Bar, M. (2009). See it with feeling: affective predictions during object perception. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 364, pp. 1325-1334. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0312.
49. Cela-Conde, C.J., et al. (2004). Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 101, pp. 6321-6325. doi:10.1073/pnas.0401427101.
50. Cela-Conde, C.J., et al. (2004). Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 101, pp. 6321-6325. doi:10.1073/pnas.0401427101.
51. Doppelmayr, M., et al. (1998). Individual differences in brain dynamics: important implications for the calculation of event-related band power. Biol. Cybern. 79, pp. 49-57.doi:10.1007/s004220050457.
52. Freedberg. D., & Gallese, V. (2007). Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends Cogn. Sci., 11, pp. 197-203. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.003.
53. Greene, C.M., Flannery, O., & Soto, D. (2014). Distinct parietal sites mediate the influences of mood, arousal, and their interaction on human recognition memory. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., 14, pp. 13271339. doi:10.3758/s13415-014-0266-y
54. Jacobsen, T., et al. (2006). Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. Neuroimage, 29, pp. 276-285. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.010.
55. Kawabata, H., & Zeki, S. (2004). Neural correlates of beauty. Neurophysiology, 91, pp. 1699-1705. doi:10.1152/jn.00696.2003.
56. Lacey, S., et al. (2011). Art for reward’s sake: visual art recruits the ventral striatum. Neuroimage, 55, pp. 420-433. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.027.
57. Lindal, P.J., & Hartig, T. (2013). Architectural variation, building height, and the restorative quality of urban residential streetscapes. J. Environ. Psychol., 33, pp. 26-36. doi:10.1016/j. jenvp.2012.09.003
58. Mallgrave, H.F., & Ikonomou, E. (1994). Empathy, form, and space: Problems in German aesthetics, pp. 1873-1893. Santa Monica: Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities.
59. Salmi. J., et al. (2014). Posterior parietal cortex activity reflects the significance of others’ actions during natural viewing. Hum. Brain. Mapp., 35, pp. 4767-4776. doi:10.1002/hbm.22510.
60. Sanchez-Vives, M.V., & Slater, M. (2005). From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 6, pp. 332-339. doi:10.1038/nrn1651.
61. Sbriscia-Fioretti, B., et al. (2013). ERP Modulation during observation of abstract paintings by Franz Kline. PLoS ONE, 8(e75241). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075241.
62. Stamps, A.E. (1999). Physical determinants of preferences for residential facades. Enviro. Behav., 31, pp. 723-751. doi:10.1177/00139169921972326.
63. Umilta, M.A., et al. (2012). Abstract art and cortical motor activation: an EEG study. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 6(311). doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00311.
64. Vartanian, O., & Goel, V. (2004). Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings. Neuroreport, 15, pp. 893-897.
65. Vartanian, O., et al. (2013). Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approachavoidance decisions in architecture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 110, pp. 10446-10453. doi:10.1073/pnas.1301227110.
66. https://www.behance.net/gallery/18992053/Pneumatic-Pavilion?locale=es_ES.
67. Hinshaw, S.P., & Cicchetti, D. (2000). Stigma and mental disorder: Conceptions of illness, public attitudes, personal disclosure, and social policy. Development and Psychopathology, 12(4), pp. 555-598.
68. Koger, S.M., & Winter, D.D. (2018). The Psychology of Environmental Problems: Psychology for Sustainability. New York Psychology Press, 2011. United Nations, Population Division, World Urbanization Prospects. https://www.esa.un.org/unpd/wup.
69. (2015). Exploration of beneficial environmental effects. Biomédica, 35, pp. 46-57.
70. De Bloom, J., Kinnunen, U., & Korpela, K. (2014). Exposure to nature versus relaxation during lunch breaks and recovery from work: Development and design of an intervention study to improve workers’ health, well-being, work performance and creativity. BMC Public Health, 14(1): 488.
71. Steel, Z., et al. (1980-2013: 2014). The global prevalence of common mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology, 43, pp. 476-493.
72, Higuera-Trujillo, J. L., Llinares, C., & Macagno, E. (2021). The cognitive-emotional design and study of architectural space: a scoping review of neuroarchitecture and its precursor approaches. Sensors, 21(2193). doi: 10.3390/s21062193.
73. Pektas, S.T. (2021). A scientometric analysis and review of spatial cognition studies within the framework of neuroscience and architecture. Archit. Sci. Rev., 64, pp. 1-9.
74. Gibson, J.J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
75. Gibson, J.J. (1977). The theory of affordances. En R. Shaw & J. Bransford (eds ), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, pp. 67-82, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
76. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
77. Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecol. Psychol. 15, pp. 181-195. doi: 10.4324/9780203726655-5.
78. Warren, W.H. (2006). The dynamics of perception and action. Psychol. Rev. 113(358).
79. Warren, W.H.Jr., & Whang, S. (1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 13(371). doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.13.3.371
80. Michaels, C.F., & Palatinus, Z. (2014). A ten commandments for ecological psychology, pp. 19-28. En L. Shapiro (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition. Abingdon: Routledge.
81. Heft, H. (2010). Affordances and the perception of landscape, pp. 9-32. En C.W. Thompson & P. Aspinall (eds.), Innovative Approaches to Research Landscape Health: Open Space: People Space 2. Abingdon: Routledge.
82. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
83. Dodds, G.P. (2000). Landscape and Garden in the Work of Carlo Scarpa. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
84. Gramann, K., et al. (2011). Cognition in action: imaging brain/body dynamics in mobile humans. Rev. Neurosci., 22, pp. 593-608. doi: 10.1515/RNS.2011.047.
85. Higuera-Trujillo, J.L., Llinares, C., & Macagno, E. (2021). The cognitive-emotional design and study of architectural space: a scoping review of neuroarchitecture and its precursor approaches. Sensors, 21(2193). doi: 10.3390/s21062193.
2. Eberhard, J.P. (2009b). Brain Landscape the Coexistence of Neuroscience and Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Eberhard, J.P. (2009a). Applying neuroscience to architecture. Neuron, 62, pp. 753-756. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.001.
4. Ezzat Ahmed, D., & Kamel, S. (2021). Exploring the contribution of neuroarchitecture in learning environments design “a review”. Int. J. Archit. Eng. Urban Res., 4, pp. 102-119. doi: 10.2478/dfl-2014-0018.
5. Fazio, M.W., Moffett, M., & Wodehouse, L. (2008). A World History of Architecture. Londres: Laurence King.
6. Pollio, V. (1914). Vitruvius, the Ten Books on Architecture. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
7. Fazio, M.W., Moffett, M., & Wodehouse, L. (2008). A World History of Architecture. Londres: Laurence King.
8. Rutherford, I. (ed.) (2016). Greco-Egyptian Interactions: Literature, Translation, and Culture, 500 BCE-300 CE. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Stendhal (2010). Rome, Naples and Florence. Alma Books.
10. Frascari, M. (1983). “The tell-the-tale detail”. En Semiotics 1981, J. N. Deely (ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Springer, pp. 325-336. doi: 10.5840/cpsem198115.
11. Frampton, K. (1985). Studies in Tectonic Culture. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Graduate School of Design Cambridge.
12. Charytonowicz, J. (2000). Architecture and ergonomics. En Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 44 (33). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, pp. 6-103. doi: 10.1177/154193120004403305.
13. Dodds, G.P. (2000). Landscape and Garden in the Work of Carlo Scarpa. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
14. Ruiz-Arellano, M. (2015, Mayo). Hawaiian Healing Center: A Weaving of Neuro-Architecture and Cultural Practices. Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
15. Gramann, K., Gwin, J.T., Ferris, D.P., Oie, K., Jung, T.P., Lin, C.T., et al. (2011). Cognition in action: imaging brain/body dynamics in mobile humans. Rev. Neurosci. 22, pp. 593- 608. doi: 10.1515/RNS.2011.047.
16. Gramann, K., McKendrick, R., Baldwin, C., Roy, R.N., Jeunet, C., Mehta, R.K., et al. (2021). Grand field challenges for cognitive neuroergonomics in the coming decade. Front. Neuroergonom. 2(6). doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2021.643969.
17. Oppenheim, I., Mühlmann, H., Blechinger, G., Mothersill, I.W., Hilfiker, P., Jokeit, H., et al. (2009). Brain electrical responses to high-and low-ranking buildings. Clin. EEG Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 40, pp. 157-161. doi: 10.1177/155005940904000307.
18. Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L.B., Gonzalez-Mora, J.L., Leder, H., et al. (2015). Architectural design and the brain: effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure on beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions. J. Environ. Psychol. 41, pp. 10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.006.
19. Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L.B., Leder, H., Modroño, C., et al. (2013). Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 110 (Suppl. 2), pp. 10446-10453. doi: 10.1073/ pnas.1301227110.
20. Kirk, U., Skov, M., Hulme, O., Christensen, M.S., & Zeki, S. (2009b). Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 44, pp. 1125-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.009.
21. Shemesh, A., Leisman, G., Bar, M., & Grobman, Y. J. (2021). A neurocognitive study of the emotional impact of geometrical criteria of architectural space. Archit. Sci. Rev., 64, pp. 394-407.
22. Martínez-Soto, J., Gonzales-Santos, L., Pasaye, E., & Barrios, F.A. (2013). Exploration of neural correlates of restorative environment exposure through functional magnetic resonance. Intell. Build. Int., 5, pp. 10-28. doi: 10.1080/17508975.2013.807765>.
23. Fich, L.B., Jönsson, P., Kirkegaard, P.H., Wallergård, M., Garde, A.H., & Hansen, Å (2014). Can architectural design alter the physiological reaction to psychosocial stress? a virtual TSST experiment. Physiol. Behav., 135, pp. 91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.034.
24. Chen et al., 2016.
25. Chen, Z., Schulz, S., He, X., & Chen, Y. (2016). A pilot experiment on affective multiple biosensory mapping for possible application to visual resource analysis and smart urban landscape design. REAL CORP 2016, CORP - Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning.
26. Andreassi, J.L. (2001). Psychophysiology: human behavior and physiological response. J. Psychophysiol., 40(1), pp. 89-91.
27. Erkan, I. (2018). Examining wayfinding behaviours in architectural spaces using brain imaging with electroencephalography (EEG). Architect. Sci. Rev., 61, pp. 410-428
28. Hollander J.B., & Foster, V. (2016a). Brain responses to architecture and planning: a preliminary neuro-assessment of the pedestrian experience in Boston, Massachusetts. Architect. Sci. Rev., 59, pp. 474-481.
29. Hollander, J.B., et al. (2019). Seeing the city: using eye-tracking technology to explore cognitive responses to the built environment. J. Urban. Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustain., 12, pp. 156-171.
30. Kambli, I., et al. (2018). Wellness by design: thoughts on reshaping Brussels’ public realm. J. Urban Des. Ment. Heal., 5, p. 13.
31. Crick, F.H. (1979). Thinking about the brain. Scientific American, 241(3), pp. 219-232.
32. Evans, G.W. (2003). The built environment and mental health. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 80(4), pp. 536-555.
33. Fink, G. (2016). Stress, definitions, mechanisms, and effects outlined: Lessons from anxiety. En G. Fink (ed.), Stress: Concepts, cognition, emotion, and behavior, pp. 3-11. Elsevier Academic Press.
34. Fox, P.T., & Friston, K.J. (2012). Distributed processing; distributed functions? NeuroImage, 61(2), pp. 407-426.
35. Kirsch, L.P., Urgesi, C., & Cross, E.S. (2016). Shaping and reshaping the aesthetic brain: Emerging perspectives on the neurobiology of embodied aesthetics. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 62, pp. 56-68.
36. Lambert, G.W., Reid, C., Kaye, D.M., Jennings, G.L., & Esler, M.D. (2002).
37. Selye, H. (1936). A Syndrome produced by Diverse Nocuous Agents. Nature, 138(32).
38. Selye, H. (1974). Stress without distress. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co. Gibson, (1966).
39. Shan, Z.Y., Liu, J.Z., Sahgal, V., Wang, B., & Yue, G.H. (2005). Selective atrophy of left hemisphere and frontal lobe of the brain in old men. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 60(2), pp. 165-174.
40. Savic, I. (2015). Structural changes of the brain in relation to occupational stress. Cerebral Cortex (Nueva York: 1991), 25(6), pp. 1554-1564.
41. Strimbu, K., & Tavel, J.A. (2010). What are biomarkers?, 5(6), pp. 463-466.
42. https://behnazfarahi.com/synapse/.
43. Niezabitowska, E. (2018). Research Methods and Techniques in Architecture. Routledge.
44. Szabo, S., Tache, Y., & Somogyi, A. (2012). The legacy of Hans Selye and the origins of stress research: a retrospective 75 years after his landmark brief “letter” to the editor# of Nature. Stress (Amsterdam), 15(5), pp. 472-478.
45. Tan, S.Y., & Yip, A. (2018). Hans Selye (1907-1982): Founder of the stress theory. Singapore Medical Journal, 59(4), pp. 170-171
46. Vive, S., Af Geijerstam, J.L., Kuhn, H.G., & Bunketorp-Käll, L. (2020). Enriched, TaskSpecific Therapy in the Chronic Phase After Stroke: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy: JNPT, 44(2), pp. 145-155.
47. Aftanas, L., & Golocheikine, S. (2001). Human anterior and frontal midline theta and lower alpha reflect emotionally positive state and internalized attention: high-resolution EEG investigation of meditation. Neurosci. Lett., 310, pp. 57-60. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02094-8.
48. Barrett, L.F., Bar, M. (2009). See it with feeling: affective predictions during object perception. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 364, pp. 1325-1334. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0312.
49. Cela-Conde, C.J., et al. (2004). Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 101, pp. 6321-6325. doi:10.1073/pnas.0401427101.
50. Cela-Conde, C.J., et al. (2004). Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 101, pp. 6321-6325. doi:10.1073/pnas.0401427101.
51. Doppelmayr, M., et al. (1998). Individual differences in brain dynamics: important implications for the calculation of event-related band power. Biol. Cybern. 79, pp. 49-57.doi:10.1007/s004220050457.
52. Freedberg. D., & Gallese, V. (2007). Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends Cogn. Sci., 11, pp. 197-203. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.003.
53. Greene, C.M., Flannery, O., & Soto, D. (2014). Distinct parietal sites mediate the influences of mood, arousal, and their interaction on human recognition memory. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., 14, pp. 13271339. doi:10.3758/s13415-014-0266-y
54. Jacobsen, T., et al. (2006). Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. Neuroimage, 29, pp. 276-285. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.010.
55. Kawabata, H., & Zeki, S. (2004). Neural correlates of beauty. Neurophysiology, 91, pp. 1699-1705. doi:10.1152/jn.00696.2003.
56. Lacey, S., et al. (2011). Art for reward’s sake: visual art recruits the ventral striatum. Neuroimage, 55, pp. 420-433. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.027.
57. Lindal, P.J., & Hartig, T. (2013). Architectural variation, building height, and the restorative quality of urban residential streetscapes. J. Environ. Psychol., 33, pp. 26-36. doi:10.1016/j. jenvp.2012.09.003
58. Mallgrave, H.F., & Ikonomou, E. (1994). Empathy, form, and space: Problems in German aesthetics, pp. 1873-1893. Santa Monica: Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities.
59. Salmi. J., et al. (2014). Posterior parietal cortex activity reflects the significance of others’ actions during natural viewing. Hum. Brain. Mapp., 35, pp. 4767-4776. doi:10.1002/hbm.22510.
60. Sanchez-Vives, M.V., & Slater, M. (2005). From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 6, pp. 332-339. doi:10.1038/nrn1651.
61. Sbriscia-Fioretti, B., et al. (2013). ERP Modulation during observation of abstract paintings by Franz Kline. PLoS ONE, 8(e75241). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075241.
62. Stamps, A.E. (1999). Physical determinants of preferences for residential facades. Enviro. Behav., 31, pp. 723-751. doi:10.1177/00139169921972326.
63. Umilta, M.A., et al. (2012). Abstract art and cortical motor activation: an EEG study. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 6(311). doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00311.
64. Vartanian, O., & Goel, V. (2004). Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings. Neuroreport, 15, pp. 893-897.
65. Vartanian, O., et al. (2013). Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approachavoidance decisions in architecture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 110, pp. 10446-10453. doi:10.1073/pnas.1301227110.
66. https://www.behance.net/gallery/18992053/Pneumatic-Pavilion?locale=es_ES.
67. Hinshaw, S.P., & Cicchetti, D. (2000). Stigma and mental disorder: Conceptions of illness, public attitudes, personal disclosure, and social policy. Development and Psychopathology, 12(4), pp. 555-598.
68. Koger, S.M., & Winter, D.D. (2018). The Psychology of Environmental Problems: Psychology for Sustainability. New York Psychology Press, 2011. United Nations, Population Division, World Urbanization Prospects. https://www.esa.un.org/unpd/wup.
69. (2015). Exploration of beneficial environmental effects. Biomédica, 35, pp. 46-57.
70. De Bloom, J., Kinnunen, U., & Korpela, K. (2014). Exposure to nature versus relaxation during lunch breaks and recovery from work: Development and design of an intervention study to improve workers’ health, well-being, work performance and creativity. BMC Public Health, 14(1): 488.
71. Steel, Z., et al. (1980-2013: 2014). The global prevalence of common mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology, 43, pp. 476-493.
72, Higuera-Trujillo, J. L., Llinares, C., & Macagno, E. (2021). The cognitive-emotional design and study of architectural space: a scoping review of neuroarchitecture and its precursor approaches. Sensors, 21(2193). doi: 10.3390/s21062193.
73. Pektas, S.T. (2021). A scientometric analysis and review of spatial cognition studies within the framework of neuroscience and architecture. Archit. Sci. Rev., 64, pp. 1-9.
74. Gibson, J.J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
75. Gibson, J.J. (1977). The theory of affordances. En R. Shaw & J. Bransford (eds ), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, pp. 67-82, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
76. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
77. Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecol. Psychol. 15, pp. 181-195. doi: 10.4324/9780203726655-5.
78. Warren, W.H. (2006). The dynamics of perception and action. Psychol. Rev. 113(358).
79. Warren, W.H.Jr., & Whang, S. (1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 13(371). doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.13.3.371
80. Michaels, C.F., & Palatinus, Z. (2014). A ten commandments for ecological psychology, pp. 19-28. En L. Shapiro (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition. Abingdon: Routledge.
81. Heft, H. (2010). Affordances and the perception of landscape, pp. 9-32. En C.W. Thompson & P. Aspinall (eds.), Innovative Approaches to Research Landscape Health: Open Space: People Space 2. Abingdon: Routledge.
82. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
83. Dodds, G.P. (2000). Landscape and Garden in the Work of Carlo Scarpa. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
84. Gramann, K., et al. (2011). Cognition in action: imaging brain/body dynamics in mobile humans. Rev. Neurosci., 22, pp. 593-608. doi: 10.1515/RNS.2011.047.
85. Higuera-Trujillo, J.L., Llinares, C., & Macagno, E. (2021). The cognitive-emotional design and study of architectural space: a scoping review of neuroarchitecture and its precursor approaches. Sensors, 21(2193). doi: 10.3390/s21062193.
Publicado
2024-04-24
Cómo citar
Al Chami, K., Estévez , A. T., & Abdallah, Y. K. (2024). Neuroarquitectura: Mejorar el bienestar y la productividad a través del diseño espacial. Cuadernos Del Centro De Estudios De Diseño Y Comunicación, (220). https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi220.11149
Sección
Artículos
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista ceden los derechos de autor y de publicación a "Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación", Aceptando el registro de su trabajo bajo una licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que de el crédito pertinente a los autores y a esta revista.
