Designing for Transitions: Addressing the Problem of Global Overfishing

  • Cheryl L. Dahle
Keywords: design; fisheries; systems; theory of change; stakeholders; overfishing; philanthropy diversity

Abstract

Nearly 10 years of applying design process to end global overfishing has led us to significant insights into methods for inventing, executing, and iterating a strategy to drive widespread shifts in human and industry behavior. The article will cover the use of design process to (a) posit a new theory of change; (b) select and incubate scores of entrepreneurial solutions and engage in “amplifying” support strategies to help those disruptive ideas gain traction; and (c) center system stakeholders as designers of their own futures. The article suggests new ways to evolve the field of Transition Design, including new metric frameworks, and argues that Transition Design is the perfect tool to assist philanthropy in crafting the emergent strategies necessary to address complex problems.

References

Ashoka. (2009). Changing the future of wild fish. Report by the Discovery Group.

Ashoka. Arlington, VA: Ashoka. http://www.futureoffish.org/sites/default/files/docs/resources/Phase%201%20Future%20of%20Wild%20Fish%20Report.pdf

Geels, F. W. (2005). The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860- 1930). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(4), 445-476.

Kania, J., Kramer, M., & Russell, P. (2014). Up for debate: Strategic philanthropy for a complex world Stanford Social Innovation Review. Available at https://ssir.org/up_for_debate/article/strategic_philanthropy

Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage points: Places to intervene in a system. The Sustainability Institute.

Published
2019-09-20
How to Cite
Dahle, C. L. (2019). Designing for Transitions: Addressing the Problem of Global Overfishing. Cuadernos Del Centro De Estudios De Diseño Y Comunicación, (73), 213 a 233. https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi73.1046