Novas perspectivas da fabricação digital no design social e no desenvolvimento econômico

  • Coroline Salvan Pagnan
  • Artur Caron Mottin
Keywords: 3D printing; new manufacturing technology; maker movement; DIY

Abstract

The market and the products / services consumption mode are passing through modifications over time, with the increase of phenomena such as the Do It Yourself (DIY) culture, the Maker Movement and greater access to environments which contribute to ideas feasibility and the digital manufacturing spaces. New perspectives of 3D printing, laser cutting and CNC machining use in the social, economic and academic development are presented, embracing an approach of ideas feasibility and solutions environments operation, seeking to understand who are the people frequenting these places, making use of these technologies and the purpose for which these resources are being applied. Examples of this new method of design, manufacture and consume products and services are exposed to demonstrate their ability to contribute to people’s life quality improvement. As a result, are pointed routes where the new technologies development and use and the manufacturing and design democratization converge to bring solutions that promote growth in various society aspects.

References

Anderson, C. (2012). A nova revolução industrial: Makers (1a ed). Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.

Barros, A. M. y Silveira, N. S. (2015). A fábrica mínima: tecnologias digitais para a produção local e customizada de artefatos físicos. Estudos em design, 23 (1), 6173.

Biohack Academy Syllabus (2016, Abril). Biofactory 1. Amsterdam: Waag Society's Biohack Academy Syllabus. Disponível em: https://biohackacademy.github.io/biofactory/.

Buechley, L., Rosner, D. K., Paulos, E. y Williams, A. (2009). DIY for CHI: Methods, Communities, and Values of Reuse and Customization. em CHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09: 2009: New York). (p. 4823-4826). New York: ACM.

Cabeza, E. U. R.; Rossi, D. C. y Moura, M. (2015). Ecossistema Open Design. em: IV International Conference on Design, Engineering, Management for innovation - IDEMi 2015. Florianópolis, de 2015. UDESC. Disponível em: http://www.idemi2015.udesc.br/anais-idemi-2015/

Costa, M. B. y Lyra, R. R. (2011). Cenarte: solução de escoamento de produção territorial. Em: 3o Simpósio Brasileiro de Design Sustentável, Recife: UFPE.

E-NABLE. (2016, Abril) Enabling the future. Disponível em: http://www.enablingthefuture.org

Eychenne, F. y Neves, H. (2013). Fab Lab: A vanguarda da Nova Revolução Industrial. São Paulo: Fab Lab Brasil. Hallgrimsson, B. (2012). Prototyping and modelmaking for product design. London: Laurence King.

Hatch, M. (2014). The Maker Movemet Manifesto: Rules for Innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. Ms Graw Hill Education.

IDEO. (2011). HCD Human Centered Design Toolkit. Canadá: IDEO.

Illich, I. (1973). Tools for Conviviatility. Londres: Marion Boyars.

Ingocraft. (2016, Abril). Disponível em: http://www.ingocraft.com/ingocraft.

Krucken, L. (2008, Julho). Competências para o design na sociedade contemporânea. Krucken, Lia; Moraes, Dijon de (Ed.). Cadernos de Estudos Avançados em Design: Transversalidade. Belo Horizonte: Centro de Estudos Teoria, Cultura e Pesquisa em Design UEMG.

Mello, W. (2009). O refinado corte a laser. Revista Siderurgia Brasil, 10 (56).

Protoprint. (2016, Abril). Disponível em: http://www.protoprint.in

Revész, G. (1950). Psychology and art of blind. London: Longmans Green.

Vega, T. (2012) O inventor e o Banco de Idéias, em Belisário, Adriano; Tarin, Bruno. Copyfight: Pirataria & Cultura Livre. São Paulo: Azougue Editorial.

Volpato, N.; Ahrens, C. H.; Ferreira, C. V.; Petrusch, G.; Carvalho, J. de; Santos, J. R. L. y Silva, J. V. L. da. (2007) Prototipagem Rápida: Tecnologias e Aplicações. São Paulo: Editora Blücher

Published
2019-09-24
How to Cite
Salvan Pagnan, C., & Caron Mottin, A. (2019). Novas perspectivas da fabricação digital no design social e no desenvolvimento econômico. Cuadernos Del Centro De Estudios De Diseño Y Comunicación, (69), 97 a 112. https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi69.1088