Convergiendo abordajes al Diseño para las Transiciones: reflexiones sobre conceptos, prácticas e implicancias en contextos latinoamericanos
Keywords:
Diverse designs, Design for transitions
Abstract
As designers, we join the call to address the socio-ecological harms of the anthropocene, many of them caused or amplified by design.
References
Adkins, B. (2015). Deleuze and Guattari’s A thousand plateaus: A critical introduction and guide. Edinburgh University Press.
Akama, Y. (2008). The Tao of Communication Design practice: Manifesting Implicit Values through Human-Centred Design [Doctoral dissertation]. RMIT University.
Akama, Y., y Light, A. (2020). Readiness for contingency: Punctuation, poise, and co-design. CoDesign, 16(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1722177
Anzaldúa, G. (2022). Borderlands / La Frontera: The New Mestiza (5th ed.). Aunt Lute Books.
Archila, M. (2017). Cómo entender el diálogo de saberes. Lasaforum, 48(2), Article 2.
Argueta Villamar, A., Corona-M, E., y Hersch, P. (Eds.). (2011). Saberes colectivos y diálogo de saberes en México (1. ed.). http://libros.iberopuebla.mx/2011/10/saberescolectivosY-dialogo-de-saberes.html
Baggio, J. A., Brown, K., y Hellebrandt, D. (2015). Boundary object or bridging concept? A citation network analysis of resilience. Ecology and Society, 20(2), Article 2. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26270178
Baños Francia, J. A. B. (2012). Arquitecturas alegóricas y urbanismos defensivos. Espacialidades. Revista de temas contemporáneos sobre lugares, política y cultura, 2(2), 221–225.
Baraibar Norberg, M. (2020). The Political Economy of Agrarian Change in Latin America: Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay. Springer Nature.
Betancourt Posada, A., y Gómez Cruz, M. de la F. (2019). La sabiduría ambiental de América profunda: Contribuciones indígenas a la conservación “desde abajo”, ejemplos de México, Colombia, Ecuador y Bolivia. Ediciones Monosílabo. https://isbnmexico.indautor.cerlalc.org/catalogo.php?mode=detalle&nt=281066
Biggs, R., Schlüter, M., y Schoon, M. (2015). Principles for building resilience: Sustaining ecosystem services in social-ecological systems. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316014240
Boehnert, J. (2018). Design, ecology, politics: Towards the ecocene. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Boehnert, J. (2019). Transition Design and Ecological Thought. Cuadernos Del Centro De Estudios De Diseño Y Comunicación, (73), 133 a 148. https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi73.1042
Botero, A., Marttila, S., Poderi, G., Saad-Sulonen, J., Seravalli, A., Teli, M., y van Amstel, F. M. C. (2020). Commoning Design and Designing Commons. Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 2, 178–180. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384772.3385162
Champman, J., y Gant, N. (Eds.). (2007). Designers Visionaries and Other Stories: A Collection of Sustainable Design Essays. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849770965
Cifor, M., García, P., Cowan, T. L., Rault, J., Sutherland, T., Chan, A. S., Rode, J., Hoffmann, A. L., Salehi, N., y Nakamura, L. (2019). Feminist Data Manifest-No. https://www.manifestno.com
Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L. J., Quinlan, A. E., Peterson, G. D., Wilkinson, C., Fünfgeld, H., McEvoy, D., Porter, L., y Davoudi, S. (2012). Resilience: A Bridging Concept or a Dead End? “Reframing” Resilience: Challenges for Planning Theory and Practice Interacting Traps: Resilience Assessment of a Pasture Management System in Northern Afghanistan Urban Resilience: What Does it Mean in Planning Practice? Resilience as a Useful Concept for Climate Change Adaptation? The Politics of Resilience for Planning: A Cautionary Note. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
Delgado, F. B., y Rist, S. (Eds.). (2016). Ciencias, diálogo de saberes y transdisciplinariedad: Aportes teórico metodológicos para la sustentabilidad alimentaria y del desarrollo. En UMSS Universidad Mayor de San Simón, FCAPyF Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas Pecuarias y Forestales, AGRUCO Agroecología Universidad de Cochabamba; Plural Editores. La Paz.
Escobar, A. (2012). Más allá del desarrollo: Postdesarrollo y transiciones hacia el pluriverso. Revista de Antropología Social, 21(0), Article 0. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RASO.2012.v21.40049
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.
Escobar, A. (2020). Pluriversal Politics: The Real and the Possible (D. Frye, Trans.). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11315v0
Ferreira, M., y Botero, A. (2020). Experimental governance? The emergence of public sector innovation labs in Latin America. Policy Design and Practice, 3(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1759761
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., y Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience Thinking: Integrating Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03610-150420
Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A. V., Reyers, B., y Rockström, J. (2016). Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society, 21(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08748-210341
Freire, P. (1976). Literacy and the possible dream. Prospects: quarterly review of education, 1(1), Article 1.
Fry, T. (2020). Defuturing: A New Design Philosophy (C. Dilnot y E. Staszowski, Eds.). Bloomsbury Visual Arts. https://www.bloomsbury.com/au/defuturing-9781350089532/
Fuglsang, L., Hansen, A. V., Mergel, I., y Røhnebæk, M. T. (2021). Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review. Administrative Sciences, 11(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020058
Galeano, E. (1982). Memoria del fuego (2a ed.). Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
García Pérez, H., y Lara Valencia, F. (2016). Equidad en la provisión de espacios públicos abiertos: Accesibilidad, percepción y uso entre mujeres de Hermosillo, Sonora. Sociedad y Ambiente, 10, Artículo 10. https://doi.org/10.31840/sya.v0i10.1651
Glück, J., y Weststrate, N. M. (2022). The Wisdom Researchers and the Elephant: An Integrative Model of Wise Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10888683221094650. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221094650
Gudynas, E. (2009). Diez Tesis Urgentes Sobre el Nuevo Extractivismo: Contextos y Demandas Bajo el Progresismo Sudamericano Actual. En Extractivismo, Política y Sociedad (pp. 187–225). CAAP Centro Andino de Acción Popular & CLAES Centro Latinoamericano de Ecología Social.
Guerrero, P. (2016). Colonialidad del saber e insurgencia de las sabidurías otras: Corazonar las epistemologías hegemónicas, como respuesta de insurgencia (de) colonial [Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar]. http://repositorio.uasb.edu.ec/bitstream/10644/5139/1/TD067-DECLA-Guerrero-Corazonar.pdf
Hakio, K., Dolejšová, M., Mattelmäki, T., Choi, J. H., y Ampatzidou, C. (2022). Following Seals and Dogs: Experimenting with Personal Dimensions of Transformative Design. Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022 - Volume 2, 2, 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1145/3537797.3537869
Haraway, D. J. (2013). When Species Meet. U of Minnesota Press.
Harrington, C., Erete, S., y Piper, A. M. (2019). Deconstructing community-based collaborative design: Towards more equitable participatory design engagements. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 25 pages. https://doi-org.cmu.idm.oclc.org/10.1145/3359318
Holloway, J. (2011). La otra política, la de la digna rabia [online]. http://www.johnholloway.com.mx/2011/07/31/la-otra-politica-la-de-la-digna- rabia/
Ingold, T. (2017). On human correspondence. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12541
Ingold, T. (2021). Correspondences. Polity.
Ingold, T. (2022). On not knowing and paying attention: How to walk in a possible world. Irish Journal of Sociology, 07916035221088546. https://doi.org/10.1177/07916035221088546
Irwin, T. (2015). Transition Design: A Proposal for a New Area of Design Practice, Study, and Research. Design and Culture, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2015.1051829
Irwin, T. (2018). The Emerging Transition Design Approach. Design Research Society 2018. https://www.academia.edu/36984858/DRS_2018_The_Emerging_Transition_Design_Approach
Johnson-Jennings, M., Jennings, D., Paul, K., y Little, M. (2020). Identifying needs and uses of digital Indigenous food knowledge and practices for an Indigenous Food Wisdom Repository. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 16(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180120954446
Juri, S. (2021). Ciclo temático SARAS: Alimentos y Sostenibilidad—Saberes sobre la Mesa. Informe final (p. 104). Instituto SARAS. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5800040
Juri, S., y Zurbriggen, C. (2022). Motivando transiciones hacia futuros sostenibles y resilientes: SARAS T-LAB en América Latina. Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación. Transition Design II Special Issue [Edición Especial], Vol.157, 115–139.
Juri, S., Baraibar, M., Clark, L. B., Cheguhem, M., Jobbagy, E., Marcone, J., Mazzeo, N., Meerhoff, M., Trimble, M., Zurbriggen, C., y Deutsch, L. (2022). Food systems transformations in South America: Insights from a transdisciplinary process rooted in Uruguay. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 1–27.
Junginger, S. (2013). Design and Innovation in the Public Sector: Matters of Design in Policy-Making and Policy Implementation. Annual Review of Policy Design, 1.
Keshavarz, M. (2018). The design politics of the passport: Materiality, immobility, and dissent. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Korsmeyer, H., Light, A., y Grocott, L. (2022). Understanding feminist anticipation through ‘back-talk’: 3 narratives of willful, deviant, and care-full co-design practices. Futures, 136, 102874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102874
Kossoff, G., y Irwin, T. (2021). Transition design as a strategy for addressing urban wicked problems. En Cities Without Capitalism. Routledge.
Laborde, G. (2017). Identidad uruguaya en cocina. Narrativas sobre el origen [Universitat de Barcelona]. http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/116483/1/LABORDE_TESIS.pdf
Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M., y Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
Leff, E. (2004). Racionalidad ambiental y diálogo de saberes. Revista Latinoamericana, 7, Artículo 7. Polis. https://journals.openedition.org/polis/6232
Leff, E. (2007). Complejidad, racionalidad ambiental y diálogo de saberes: Hacia una pedagogía ambiental. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 16, Artículo 16.
Lewis, J. M. (2021). The limits of policy labs: Characteristics, opportunities and constraints. Policy Design and Practice, 4(2), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1859077
Lewis, J., Mcgann, M., y Blomkamp, E. (2019). When design meets power: Design thinking, public sector innovation and the politics of policymaking. Policy & Politics. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420081
Light, A. (2018). Ideas of Autonomía: Buzzwords, borderlands and research through design. Strategic Design Research Journal, 11(2), 147–153.
López Torrero, J. C., y Navarro Navarro, L. A. (2023). Inventario de parques urbanos para el cumplimiento de la Agenda 2030: El caso de Hermosillo, Sonora. Frontera Norte, 35. https://doi.org/10.33679/rfn.v1i1.2307
Lugones, M. (1987). Playfulness, “World”-Travelling, and Loving Perception. Hypatia, 2(2), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01062.x
Lugones, M. (1992). On Borderlands/La Frontera: An Interpretive Essay. Hypatia, 7(4), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1992.tb00715.x
Max-Neef, M. (1991) Human Scale Development. Apex Press, New York.
Manzini, E. (2015). Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. MIT Press.
Mata-Marin, S. (2020). Bordering Designs Contestation Designs: An Exploration of Undocumented Nicaraguan Women’s Everyday Life in Costa Rica [Doctoral dissertation]. Carnegie Mellon University. https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/12378575.v1
Maxwell, N. (2007). From knowledge to wisdom: The need for an academic revolution. London Review of Education, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460701440350
Mazé, R. (2019). Politics of designing visions of the future. Journal of Futures Studies, 23(3),
23–38. Mazzucato, M. (2021). Mission Economy: A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism. Penguin Books Limited. McBride, B. B., Brewer, C. A., Berkowitz, A. R., y Borrie, W. T. (2013). Environmental literacy, ecological literacy, ecoliteracy: What do we mean and how did we get here? Ecosphere, 4(5), art67. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00075.1
Meadows, D. (1997). Places to intervene in a system (in increasing order of effectiveness). Whole Earth, 91(1), Article 1.
Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer (D. Wright, Ed.). Earthscan.
Méndez Sáinz, E., Duarte Aguilar, A., y Aragón Palacios, M. (2013). El proyecto de ciudad Hermosillo 2009-2012: “de cartón piedra... En un escaparate.” En Estudios sobre Sonora 2011 Instituciones, procesos socioespaciales, simbólica e imaginario. El Colegio de Sonora. https://www.academia.edu/11993631/El_proyecto_de_ciudad_Hermosillo_2009_2012_de_cart% C3%B3n_piedra_en_un_escaparate_
Mercado Maldonado, L., y Marincic Lovriha, I. (2017). Morfología de Isla de Calor Urbana en Hermosillo, Sonora y su Aporte hacia una Ciudad Sustentable. Biotecnia, 19, 27–33.
Mezzadra, S., y Neilson, B. (2017). On the multiple frontiers of extraction: Excavating contemporary capitalism. Cultural Studies, 31(2–3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1303425
Miller, T. R., Wiek, A., Sarewitz, D., Robinson, J., Olsson, L., Kriebel, D., y Loorbach, D. (2014). The future of sustainability science: A solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustainability Science, 9(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0224-6
Miller, T. R., Muñoz-Erickson, T., y Redman, C. L. (2011). Transforming knowledge for sustainability: Towards adaptive academic institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371111118228
Moreno-Cely, A., Cuajera-Nahui, D., Escobar-Vasquez, C. G., Vanwing, T., y Tapia-Ponce, N. (2021).Breaking Monologues in Collaborative Research: Bridging Knowledge Systems through a Listening-Based Dialogue of Wisdom Approach. Sustainability Science, 16(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00937-8.
Moreno, J. L. (2012). “A Never-Ending Source of Water”: Agriculture, Society, and Aquifer Depletion on the Coast of Hermosillo, Sonora. Journal of the Southwest, 54(4), 545–568.
OECD y FAO. (2021). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2021-2030. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19428846-en
Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. State University of New York Press.
Ortega Pallanez, M. (2023). Becoming Resonant in Design: An inquiry into public space exclusion in Hermosillo, Mexico through women-plant relations [Doctoral dissertation]. Carnegie Mellon University. https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/23422235.v1
Ortega Rosas, C. I., Martínez Salido, J., Sánchez Duarte, N. E., y Morales Romero, D. (2022). Cobertura y composición arbórea en las áreas verdes de Hermosillo, Sonora: Aportaciones al urbanismo sustentable. región y sociedad, 34, e1610–e1610. https://doi.org/10.22198/rys2022/34/1610
Pérez-Bustos, T. (2017). Thinking with Care (C. Quassolo, Trans.). Revue d’anthropologie Des Connaissances, 11(1), Artículo 1. https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.034.a
Pérez-Bustos, T., y Chocontá Piraquive, A. (2018). Bordando una etnografía: Sobre cómo el bordar colectivo afecta la intimidad etnográfica. Debate Feminista, 56, 1–25.
Pinto, N., Vertiz, B., y Botero, A. (2022). Resistance, social reproduction and emerging commitments for collaborative design from the margins. DRS Biennial Conference Series. https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2022/researchpapers/227
Proyecto REDD+. (2020). Población Indígena en Uruguay y su vínculo con el bosque. Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca - Ministerio de Vivienda, Ordenamiento Territorial, Medio Ambiente.
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2012). ‘Nothing Comes Without Its World’: Thinking with Care. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.
Quijano, A., y Ennis, M. (2000). Coloniality of power, eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from the South, 1 (3), 533-580.
Rahnema, M. (1976). Literacy: To read or the world? Prospects: quarterly review of education, 1(1), Article 1.
Rivera Cusicanqui, S. (2018). Un Mundo Ch’ixi es Posible: Ensayos desde un Presente en Crisis. TINTA LIMON. https://traficantes.net/libros/un-mundo-chixi-es-posible
Sandoval, C. (1995). Feminist forms of agency and oppositional consciousness: U.S. third world feminist criticism. En J. Kegan Gardiner Provoking agents: Gender and agency in theory and practice. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Scarry, E. (1987). The body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world. Oxford University Press. Solnit, R. (2016). Hope in the Dark: Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities. Haymarket Books.
Stengers, I. (2010). Cosmopolitics I (R. Bononno, Trans.; 1st ed.). University of Minnesota Press. https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/cosmopolitics-i
van Amstel, F. M. C. (2021, November 12). Designing relations in Prospective Design. Frederick van Amstel. Design Researcher & Educator. https://fredvanamstel.com/talks/designing-relations-in-prospective-design
van Amstel, F. M. C., y Gonzatto, R. F. (2020). The anthropophagic studio: Towards a critical pedagogy for interaction design. Digital Creativity, 31(4), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2020.1802295
van Amstel, F. M. C., Noel, L.-A., y Gonzatto, R. F. (2022). Design, Oppression, and Liberation. Diseña, 21, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.21.Intro
Vázquez, R. (2012). Towards a Decolonial Critique of Modernity. Buen Vivir, Relationality and the Task of Listening. In R. Fornet-Betancourt (Ed.), Kapital, Armut, Entwicklung. Capital, Poverty, Development. Capital, Pobreza, Desarrollo (Vol. 33, pp. 241–252). Verlag Mainz. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271506450_Towards_a_Decolonial_Critique_of_Moder nity_Bu_en_Viivi_r_Relationality_and_the_Task_of_Listening
Verdesio, G. (2014). Un fantasma recorre el Uruguay: La reemergencia charrúa en un “país sin indios”. Cuadernos de Literatura, 18(36), 86–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.11144/ Javeriana.CL18-36.frur
Wahl, D. C., y Baxter, S. (2008). The Designer’s Role in Facilitating Sustainable Solutions. Design Issues, 24(2), Article 2.
Wellstead, A. M., Gofen, A., y Carter, A. (2021). Policy innovation lab scholarship: Past, present, and the future – Introduction to the special issue on policy innovation labs. Policy Design and Practice, 4(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1940700
Weststrate, N. M., Bluck, S., y Glück, J. (2019). Wisdom of the Crowd: Exploring People’s Conceptions of Wisdom. En J. Glück y R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Wisdom (pp. 97–121). Cambridge University Press; Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108568272.006
Whicher, A. (2021). Evolution of policy labs and use of design for policy in UK government.Policy Design and Practice, 4(2), 252–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1883834
Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge (Vol. 15). Random House.
Whitcomb, A. (2016). (re) Forming Accounts of Ethics in Design: Anecdote as a Way to Express the Experience of Designing Together [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Gothenburg.
Yang, S., y Intezari, A. (2019). Non-western lay conceptions of wisdom. En The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 429–452). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108568272.020
Yazdani, N., y Çetin, B. (2022, July 22). Dreaming Beyond AI. https://dreamingbeyond.ai/ en/e/about Zúñiga Elizalde, M. (2014). Las mujeres en los espacios públicos: Entre la violencia y la búsqueda de libertad. Región y sociedad, 26(ESPECIAL 4), 78–100.
Zurbriggen, C., y Juri, S. (2021). Designing transition spaces for sustainable futures: SARAS Transition Lab. En The Future of the Past: Paths towards Participatory Governance for Cultural Heritage (p. n/a). CRC Press.
Abstract: As designers, we join the call to address the socio-ecological harms of the anthropocene, many of them caused or amplified by design. Our motivation with this article is to offer a critical and pluralistic look at the integration of mandates such as ecological literacy in the practices of Design for Transitions to sustainability in Latin American contexts.
We offer this analysis based on reflections on our work linked to Design for Transitions in three Latin American contexts: one in the far southeast (Montevideo, Uruguay), one in the second most populated city in the region (Mexico City), and the last in the far northwest (Hermosillo, Mexico). We discuss the adoption of ecological literacy within the Design for Transitions worldview in Latin America. On the one hand, we expose and acknowledge that there is no unifying vision of Design for Transitions practices in this vast region. On the other hand, we explore what could be alternatives and points of convergence between concepts and approaches in practice that resonate with Latin American situations, seeking to avoid falling into epistemic colonisation and erasure.
Through this joint reflection, we seek to contribute to the range of Designs for Transitions by emphasising that beyond the integration of ecological literacy (or its absence) as a strategy, different nuances and approaches need to converge between various designs and their practices, to address environmental harms and injustices as part of a nature-culture continuum.
We will use the following main questions to guide these reflections: what does an ecological literacy approach imply when it moves beyond the confines of the academy? Is ecological literacy necessary in a region where literacy has been linked to the development of the colonial nation-state? And how does Transition Design take root and emerge from territorial specificity?
Akama, Y. (2008). The Tao of Communication Design practice: Manifesting Implicit Values through Human-Centred Design [Doctoral dissertation]. RMIT University.
Akama, Y., y Light, A. (2020). Readiness for contingency: Punctuation, poise, and co-design. CoDesign, 16(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1722177
Anzaldúa, G. (2022). Borderlands / La Frontera: The New Mestiza (5th ed.). Aunt Lute Books.
Archila, M. (2017). Cómo entender el diálogo de saberes. Lasaforum, 48(2), Article 2.
Argueta Villamar, A., Corona-M, E., y Hersch, P. (Eds.). (2011). Saberes colectivos y diálogo de saberes en México (1. ed.). http://libros.iberopuebla.mx/2011/10/saberescolectivosY-dialogo-de-saberes.html
Baggio, J. A., Brown, K., y Hellebrandt, D. (2015). Boundary object or bridging concept? A citation network analysis of resilience. Ecology and Society, 20(2), Article 2. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26270178
Baños Francia, J. A. B. (2012). Arquitecturas alegóricas y urbanismos defensivos. Espacialidades. Revista de temas contemporáneos sobre lugares, política y cultura, 2(2), 221–225.
Baraibar Norberg, M. (2020). The Political Economy of Agrarian Change in Latin America: Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay. Springer Nature.
Betancourt Posada, A., y Gómez Cruz, M. de la F. (2019). La sabiduría ambiental de América profunda: Contribuciones indígenas a la conservación “desde abajo”, ejemplos de México, Colombia, Ecuador y Bolivia. Ediciones Monosílabo. https://isbnmexico.indautor.cerlalc.org/catalogo.php?mode=detalle&nt=281066
Biggs, R., Schlüter, M., y Schoon, M. (2015). Principles for building resilience: Sustaining ecosystem services in social-ecological systems. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316014240
Boehnert, J. (2018). Design, ecology, politics: Towards the ecocene. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Boehnert, J. (2019). Transition Design and Ecological Thought. Cuadernos Del Centro De Estudios De Diseño Y Comunicación, (73), 133 a 148. https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi73.1042
Botero, A., Marttila, S., Poderi, G., Saad-Sulonen, J., Seravalli, A., Teli, M., y van Amstel, F. M. C. (2020). Commoning Design and Designing Commons. Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 2, 178–180. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384772.3385162
Champman, J., y Gant, N. (Eds.). (2007). Designers Visionaries and Other Stories: A Collection of Sustainable Design Essays. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849770965
Cifor, M., García, P., Cowan, T. L., Rault, J., Sutherland, T., Chan, A. S., Rode, J., Hoffmann, A. L., Salehi, N., y Nakamura, L. (2019). Feminist Data Manifest-No. https://www.manifestno.com
Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L. J., Quinlan, A. E., Peterson, G. D., Wilkinson, C., Fünfgeld, H., McEvoy, D., Porter, L., y Davoudi, S. (2012). Resilience: A Bridging Concept or a Dead End? “Reframing” Resilience: Challenges for Planning Theory and Practice Interacting Traps: Resilience Assessment of a Pasture Management System in Northern Afghanistan Urban Resilience: What Does it Mean in Planning Practice? Resilience as a Useful Concept for Climate Change Adaptation? The Politics of Resilience for Planning: A Cautionary Note. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
Delgado, F. B., y Rist, S. (Eds.). (2016). Ciencias, diálogo de saberes y transdisciplinariedad: Aportes teórico metodológicos para la sustentabilidad alimentaria y del desarrollo. En UMSS Universidad Mayor de San Simón, FCAPyF Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas Pecuarias y Forestales, AGRUCO Agroecología Universidad de Cochabamba; Plural Editores. La Paz.
Escobar, A. (2012). Más allá del desarrollo: Postdesarrollo y transiciones hacia el pluriverso. Revista de Antropología Social, 21(0), Article 0. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RASO.2012.v21.40049
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.
Escobar, A. (2020). Pluriversal Politics: The Real and the Possible (D. Frye, Trans.). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11315v0
Ferreira, M., y Botero, A. (2020). Experimental governance? The emergence of public sector innovation labs in Latin America. Policy Design and Practice, 3(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1759761
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., y Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience Thinking: Integrating Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03610-150420
Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A. V., Reyers, B., y Rockström, J. (2016). Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society, 21(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08748-210341
Freire, P. (1976). Literacy and the possible dream. Prospects: quarterly review of education, 1(1), Article 1.
Fry, T. (2020). Defuturing: A New Design Philosophy (C. Dilnot y E. Staszowski, Eds.). Bloomsbury Visual Arts. https://www.bloomsbury.com/au/defuturing-9781350089532/
Fuglsang, L., Hansen, A. V., Mergel, I., y Røhnebæk, M. T. (2021). Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review. Administrative Sciences, 11(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020058
Galeano, E. (1982). Memoria del fuego (2a ed.). Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
García Pérez, H., y Lara Valencia, F. (2016). Equidad en la provisión de espacios públicos abiertos: Accesibilidad, percepción y uso entre mujeres de Hermosillo, Sonora. Sociedad y Ambiente, 10, Artículo 10. https://doi.org/10.31840/sya.v0i10.1651
Glück, J., y Weststrate, N. M. (2022). The Wisdom Researchers and the Elephant: An Integrative Model of Wise Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10888683221094650. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221094650
Gudynas, E. (2009). Diez Tesis Urgentes Sobre el Nuevo Extractivismo: Contextos y Demandas Bajo el Progresismo Sudamericano Actual. En Extractivismo, Política y Sociedad (pp. 187–225). CAAP Centro Andino de Acción Popular & CLAES Centro Latinoamericano de Ecología Social.
Guerrero, P. (2016). Colonialidad del saber e insurgencia de las sabidurías otras: Corazonar las epistemologías hegemónicas, como respuesta de insurgencia (de) colonial [Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar]. http://repositorio.uasb.edu.ec/bitstream/10644/5139/1/TD067-DECLA-Guerrero-Corazonar.pdf
Hakio, K., Dolejšová, M., Mattelmäki, T., Choi, J. H., y Ampatzidou, C. (2022). Following Seals and Dogs: Experimenting with Personal Dimensions of Transformative Design. Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022 - Volume 2, 2, 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1145/3537797.3537869
Haraway, D. J. (2013). When Species Meet. U of Minnesota Press.
Harrington, C., Erete, S., y Piper, A. M. (2019). Deconstructing community-based collaborative design: Towards more equitable participatory design engagements. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 25 pages. https://doi-org.cmu.idm.oclc.org/10.1145/3359318
Holloway, J. (2011). La otra política, la de la digna rabia [online]. http://www.johnholloway.com.mx/2011/07/31/la-otra-politica-la-de-la-digna- rabia/
Ingold, T. (2017). On human correspondence. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12541
Ingold, T. (2021). Correspondences. Polity.
Ingold, T. (2022). On not knowing and paying attention: How to walk in a possible world. Irish Journal of Sociology, 07916035221088546. https://doi.org/10.1177/07916035221088546
Irwin, T. (2015). Transition Design: A Proposal for a New Area of Design Practice, Study, and Research. Design and Culture, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2015.1051829
Irwin, T. (2018). The Emerging Transition Design Approach. Design Research Society 2018. https://www.academia.edu/36984858/DRS_2018_The_Emerging_Transition_Design_Approach
Johnson-Jennings, M., Jennings, D., Paul, K., y Little, M. (2020). Identifying needs and uses of digital Indigenous food knowledge and practices for an Indigenous Food Wisdom Repository. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 16(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180120954446
Juri, S. (2021). Ciclo temático SARAS: Alimentos y Sostenibilidad—Saberes sobre la Mesa. Informe final (p. 104). Instituto SARAS. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5800040
Juri, S., y Zurbriggen, C. (2022). Motivando transiciones hacia futuros sostenibles y resilientes: SARAS T-LAB en América Latina. Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación. Transition Design II Special Issue [Edición Especial], Vol.157, 115–139.
Juri, S., Baraibar, M., Clark, L. B., Cheguhem, M., Jobbagy, E., Marcone, J., Mazzeo, N., Meerhoff, M., Trimble, M., Zurbriggen, C., y Deutsch, L. (2022). Food systems transformations in South America: Insights from a transdisciplinary process rooted in Uruguay. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 1–27.
Junginger, S. (2013). Design and Innovation in the Public Sector: Matters of Design in Policy-Making and Policy Implementation. Annual Review of Policy Design, 1.
Keshavarz, M. (2018). The design politics of the passport: Materiality, immobility, and dissent. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Korsmeyer, H., Light, A., y Grocott, L. (2022). Understanding feminist anticipation through ‘back-talk’: 3 narratives of willful, deviant, and care-full co-design practices. Futures, 136, 102874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102874
Kossoff, G., y Irwin, T. (2021). Transition design as a strategy for addressing urban wicked problems. En Cities Without Capitalism. Routledge.
Laborde, G. (2017). Identidad uruguaya en cocina. Narrativas sobre el origen [Universitat de Barcelona]. http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/116483/1/LABORDE_TESIS.pdf
Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M., y Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
Leff, E. (2004). Racionalidad ambiental y diálogo de saberes. Revista Latinoamericana, 7, Artículo 7. Polis. https://journals.openedition.org/polis/6232
Leff, E. (2007). Complejidad, racionalidad ambiental y diálogo de saberes: Hacia una pedagogía ambiental. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 16, Artículo 16.
Lewis, J. M. (2021). The limits of policy labs: Characteristics, opportunities and constraints. Policy Design and Practice, 4(2), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1859077
Lewis, J., Mcgann, M., y Blomkamp, E. (2019). When design meets power: Design thinking, public sector innovation and the politics of policymaking. Policy & Politics. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420081
Light, A. (2018). Ideas of Autonomía: Buzzwords, borderlands and research through design. Strategic Design Research Journal, 11(2), 147–153.
López Torrero, J. C., y Navarro Navarro, L. A. (2023). Inventario de parques urbanos para el cumplimiento de la Agenda 2030: El caso de Hermosillo, Sonora. Frontera Norte, 35. https://doi.org/10.33679/rfn.v1i1.2307
Lugones, M. (1987). Playfulness, “World”-Travelling, and Loving Perception. Hypatia, 2(2), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01062.x
Lugones, M. (1992). On Borderlands/La Frontera: An Interpretive Essay. Hypatia, 7(4), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1992.tb00715.x
Max-Neef, M. (1991) Human Scale Development. Apex Press, New York.
Manzini, E. (2015). Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. MIT Press.
Mata-Marin, S. (2020). Bordering Designs Contestation Designs: An Exploration of Undocumented Nicaraguan Women’s Everyday Life in Costa Rica [Doctoral dissertation]. Carnegie Mellon University. https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/12378575.v1
Maxwell, N. (2007). From knowledge to wisdom: The need for an academic revolution. London Review of Education, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460701440350
Mazé, R. (2019). Politics of designing visions of the future. Journal of Futures Studies, 23(3),
23–38. Mazzucato, M. (2021). Mission Economy: A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism. Penguin Books Limited. McBride, B. B., Brewer, C. A., Berkowitz, A. R., y Borrie, W. T. (2013). Environmental literacy, ecological literacy, ecoliteracy: What do we mean and how did we get here? Ecosphere, 4(5), art67. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00075.1
Meadows, D. (1997). Places to intervene in a system (in increasing order of effectiveness). Whole Earth, 91(1), Article 1.
Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer (D. Wright, Ed.). Earthscan.
Méndez Sáinz, E., Duarte Aguilar, A., y Aragón Palacios, M. (2013). El proyecto de ciudad Hermosillo 2009-2012: “de cartón piedra... En un escaparate.” En Estudios sobre Sonora 2011 Instituciones, procesos socioespaciales, simbólica e imaginario. El Colegio de Sonora. https://www.academia.edu/11993631/El_proyecto_de_ciudad_Hermosillo_2009_2012_de_cart% C3%B3n_piedra_en_un_escaparate_
Mercado Maldonado, L., y Marincic Lovriha, I. (2017). Morfología de Isla de Calor Urbana en Hermosillo, Sonora y su Aporte hacia una Ciudad Sustentable. Biotecnia, 19, 27–33.
Mezzadra, S., y Neilson, B. (2017). On the multiple frontiers of extraction: Excavating contemporary capitalism. Cultural Studies, 31(2–3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1303425
Miller, T. R., Wiek, A., Sarewitz, D., Robinson, J., Olsson, L., Kriebel, D., y Loorbach, D. (2014). The future of sustainability science: A solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustainability Science, 9(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0224-6
Miller, T. R., Muñoz-Erickson, T., y Redman, C. L. (2011). Transforming knowledge for sustainability: Towards adaptive academic institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371111118228
Moreno-Cely, A., Cuajera-Nahui, D., Escobar-Vasquez, C. G., Vanwing, T., y Tapia-Ponce, N. (2021).Breaking Monologues in Collaborative Research: Bridging Knowledge Systems through a Listening-Based Dialogue of Wisdom Approach. Sustainability Science, 16(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00937-8.
Moreno, J. L. (2012). “A Never-Ending Source of Water”: Agriculture, Society, and Aquifer Depletion on the Coast of Hermosillo, Sonora. Journal of the Southwest, 54(4), 545–568.
OECD y FAO. (2021). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2021-2030. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19428846-en
Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. State University of New York Press.
Ortega Pallanez, M. (2023). Becoming Resonant in Design: An inquiry into public space exclusion in Hermosillo, Mexico through women-plant relations [Doctoral dissertation]. Carnegie Mellon University. https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/23422235.v1
Ortega Rosas, C. I., Martínez Salido, J., Sánchez Duarte, N. E., y Morales Romero, D. (2022). Cobertura y composición arbórea en las áreas verdes de Hermosillo, Sonora: Aportaciones al urbanismo sustentable. región y sociedad, 34, e1610–e1610. https://doi.org/10.22198/rys2022/34/1610
Pérez-Bustos, T. (2017). Thinking with Care (C. Quassolo, Trans.). Revue d’anthropologie Des Connaissances, 11(1), Artículo 1. https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.034.a
Pérez-Bustos, T., y Chocontá Piraquive, A. (2018). Bordando una etnografía: Sobre cómo el bordar colectivo afecta la intimidad etnográfica. Debate Feminista, 56, 1–25.
Pinto, N., Vertiz, B., y Botero, A. (2022). Resistance, social reproduction and emerging commitments for collaborative design from the margins. DRS Biennial Conference Series. https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2022/researchpapers/227
Proyecto REDD+. (2020). Población Indígena en Uruguay y su vínculo con el bosque. Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca - Ministerio de Vivienda, Ordenamiento Territorial, Medio Ambiente.
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2012). ‘Nothing Comes Without Its World’: Thinking with Care. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.
Quijano, A., y Ennis, M. (2000). Coloniality of power, eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from the South, 1 (3), 533-580.
Rahnema, M. (1976). Literacy: To read or the world? Prospects: quarterly review of education, 1(1), Article 1.
Rivera Cusicanqui, S. (2018). Un Mundo Ch’ixi es Posible: Ensayos desde un Presente en Crisis. TINTA LIMON. https://traficantes.net/libros/un-mundo-chixi-es-posible
Sandoval, C. (1995). Feminist forms of agency and oppositional consciousness: U.S. third world feminist criticism. En J. Kegan Gardiner Provoking agents: Gender and agency in theory and practice. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Scarry, E. (1987). The body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world. Oxford University Press. Solnit, R. (2016). Hope in the Dark: Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities. Haymarket Books.
Stengers, I. (2010). Cosmopolitics I (R. Bononno, Trans.; 1st ed.). University of Minnesota Press. https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/cosmopolitics-i
van Amstel, F. M. C. (2021, November 12). Designing relations in Prospective Design. Frederick van Amstel. Design Researcher & Educator. https://fredvanamstel.com/talks/designing-relations-in-prospective-design
van Amstel, F. M. C., y Gonzatto, R. F. (2020). The anthropophagic studio: Towards a critical pedagogy for interaction design. Digital Creativity, 31(4), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2020.1802295
van Amstel, F. M. C., Noel, L.-A., y Gonzatto, R. F. (2022). Design, Oppression, and Liberation. Diseña, 21, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.21.Intro
Vázquez, R. (2012). Towards a Decolonial Critique of Modernity. Buen Vivir, Relationality and the Task of Listening. In R. Fornet-Betancourt (Ed.), Kapital, Armut, Entwicklung. Capital, Poverty, Development. Capital, Pobreza, Desarrollo (Vol. 33, pp. 241–252). Verlag Mainz. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271506450_Towards_a_Decolonial_Critique_of_Moder nity_Bu_en_Viivi_r_Relationality_and_the_Task_of_Listening
Verdesio, G. (2014). Un fantasma recorre el Uruguay: La reemergencia charrúa en un “país sin indios”. Cuadernos de Literatura, 18(36), 86–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.11144/ Javeriana.CL18-36.frur
Wahl, D. C., y Baxter, S. (2008). The Designer’s Role in Facilitating Sustainable Solutions. Design Issues, 24(2), Article 2.
Wellstead, A. M., Gofen, A., y Carter, A. (2021). Policy innovation lab scholarship: Past, present, and the future – Introduction to the special issue on policy innovation labs. Policy Design and Practice, 4(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1940700
Weststrate, N. M., Bluck, S., y Glück, J. (2019). Wisdom of the Crowd: Exploring People’s Conceptions of Wisdom. En J. Glück y R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Wisdom (pp. 97–121). Cambridge University Press; Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108568272.006
Whicher, A. (2021). Evolution of policy labs and use of design for policy in UK government.Policy Design and Practice, 4(2), 252–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2021.1883834
Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge (Vol. 15). Random House.
Whitcomb, A. (2016). (re) Forming Accounts of Ethics in Design: Anecdote as a Way to Express the Experience of Designing Together [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Gothenburg.
Yang, S., y Intezari, A. (2019). Non-western lay conceptions of wisdom. En The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 429–452). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108568272.020
Yazdani, N., y Çetin, B. (2022, July 22). Dreaming Beyond AI. https://dreamingbeyond.ai/ en/e/about Zúñiga Elizalde, M. (2014). Las mujeres en los espacios públicos: Entre la violencia y la búsqueda de libertad. Región y sociedad, 26(ESPECIAL 4), 78–100.
Zurbriggen, C., y Juri, S. (2021). Designing transition spaces for sustainable futures: SARAS Transition Lab. En The Future of the Past: Paths towards Participatory Governance for Cultural Heritage (p. n/a). CRC Press.
Abstract: As designers, we join the call to address the socio-ecological harms of the anthropocene, many of them caused or amplified by design. Our motivation with this article is to offer a critical and pluralistic look at the integration of mandates such as ecological literacy in the practices of Design for Transitions to sustainability in Latin American contexts.
We offer this analysis based on reflections on our work linked to Design for Transitions in three Latin American contexts: one in the far southeast (Montevideo, Uruguay), one in the second most populated city in the region (Mexico City), and the last in the far northwest (Hermosillo, Mexico). We discuss the adoption of ecological literacy within the Design for Transitions worldview in Latin America. On the one hand, we expose and acknowledge that there is no unifying vision of Design for Transitions practices in this vast region. On the other hand, we explore what could be alternatives and points of convergence between concepts and approaches in practice that resonate with Latin American situations, seeking to avoid falling into epistemic colonisation and erasure.
Through this joint reflection, we seek to contribute to the range of Designs for Transitions by emphasising that beyond the integration of ecological literacy (or its absence) as a strategy, different nuances and approaches need to converge between various designs and their practices, to address environmental harms and injustices as part of a nature-culture continuum.
We will use the following main questions to guide these reflections: what does an ecological literacy approach imply when it moves beyond the confines of the academy? Is ecological literacy necessary in a region where literacy has been linked to the development of the colonial nation-state? And how does Transition Design take root and emerge from territorial specificity?
Published
2024-05-13
How to Cite
Ortega Pallanez, M., Juri, S., & Bosch Gómez, S. (2024). Convergiendo abordajes al Diseño para las Transiciones: reflexiones sobre conceptos, prácticas e implicancias en contextos latinoamericanos. Cuadernos Del Centro De Estudios De Diseño Y Comunicación, (222). https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi222.11203
Section
Artículos
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista ceden los derechos de autor y de publicación a "Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación", Aceptando el registro de su trabajo bajo una licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que de el crédito pertinente a los autores y a esta revista.
