Motivando transiciones hacia futuros sostenibles y resilientes: SARAS T-LAB en América Latina
Résumé
La naturaleza interrelacionada de las múltiples crisis socioambientales que acechan a América Latina exige una acción colectiva audaz, urgente y creativa. Los problemas perversos que se pueden encontrar interconectando estas crisis caracterizan una necesidad de integración genuina del conocimiento (transdisciplina) que pueda articular y trascender el conocimiento académico por sí solo.
Références
Ackoff, R. L. (1974). Redesigning the future: A systems approach to societal problems. Wiley. //catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/000014788
Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of applied systems analysis, 16(1), 3-9. Albán-Achinte, A. (2012). Estéticas de la re-existencia: ¿Lo político del arte. En Estéticas y opción decolonial (1.a ed., pp. 281-295). Editorial UD.
Ansell, C., & Geyer, R. (2017). ‘Pragmatic complexity’a new foundation for moving beyond ‘evidence-based policy making’? Policy Studies, 38(2), 149-167. Economics, 130, 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.05.016
Arkesteijn, M., van Mierlo, B., & Leeuwis, C. (2015). The need for reflexive evaluation approaches in development cooperation. Evaluation, 21(1), 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389014564719
Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society. Policy press
Biggs, R.; Schlüter, M. & Schoon, M. (2015). Principles for building resilience: Sustaining ecosystem services in social-ecological systems. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316014240
Brugnach, M.; Henriksen, H.; Van Der Keur, P., & Mysiak, J. (2009). Uncertainty in adaptive water management. Concepts and guidelines. Osnabrück: University of Osnabrück.
Candy, S., & Kornet, K. (2019). Turning foresight inside out: An introduction to ethnographic experiential futures. Journal of Futures Studies, 23(3), 3-22.
Ceschin, F., & Gaziulusoy, I. (2019). Design for Sustainability. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429456510
Checkland, P. (2000). Soft systems methodology: A thirty year retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17(S1), S11-S58. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1743(200011)17:1+<::AID-SRES374>3.0.CO;2-O
Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley.
Chomsky, N.; Elders, F., & Foucault, M. (2006). La naturaleza humana: Justicia versus poder. Un debate (L. Livchits, Trad.). https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=393796
Churchman, C. W. (1979). The systems approach and its enemies. Basic Books. Cinalli, M., & O’Flynn, I. (2014). Public Deliberation, Network Analysis and the Political Integration of Muslims in Britain. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(3), 428-451. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12003
Colebatch, H. K. (2018). The idea of policy design: Intention, process, outcome, meaning and validity. Public Policy and Administration, 33(4), 365-383.
Cross, N. (2001). Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793601750357196
Curtis, D. J. (2009). Creating inspiration: The role of the arts in creating empathy for ecological restoration. Ecological Management & Restoration, 10(3), 174-184.
Curtis, D. J.; Reid, N., & Ballard, G. (2012). Communicating ecology through art: What scientists think. Ecology and Society, 17(2).
Dash, A. (2016). An epistemological reflection on social and solidarity economy. 45(1), 61-87.
Davis, O. L. (1997). Editorial: Beyond «best practices» toward wise practices. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 13(1), 1.
Delgado, F. B. (Ed.). (2016). Ciencias, diálogo de saberes y transdisciplinariedad: Aportes teórico metodológicos para la sustentabilidad alimentaria y del desarrollo. UMSS Universidad Mayor de San Simón, FCAPyF Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas Pecuarias y Forestales, AGRUCO Agroecología Univerdad de Cochabamba ; Plural Editores.
Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and Its Problems (New York: H. Holt and Company).
Du Plessis, C., & Cole, R. J. (2011). Motivating change: Shifting the paradigm. Building Research and Information, 39(5), 436-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2011.582697
Escobar, A. (2015). Transiciones: A space for research and design for transitions to the pluriverse. Design Philosophy Papers, 13(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2015.1085690
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.
Folke, C.; Biggs, R.; Norström, A. V.; Reyers, B., & Rockström, J. (2016). Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08748-210341
Folke, C.; Carpenter, S. R.; Walker, B.; Scheffer, M.; Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience Thinking: Integrating Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), art20-art20. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03610-150420
Folke, C.; Hahn, T.; Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441-473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
Forsyth, T. (2018). Is resilience to climate change socially inclusive? Investigating theories of change processes in Myanmar. World Development, 111, 13-26.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
Fry, T., & Tlostanova, M. (2020). A New Political Imagination: Making the Case. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003038221
Galafassi, D. (2018). The Transformative Imagination: Re-imagining the world towards sustainability [Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University]. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-152294
Geels, F. W. (2005). The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860- 1930). Technology analysis & strategic management, 17(4), 445-476.
Goldman, M. J.; Turner, M. D., & Daly, M. (2018). A critical political ecology of human dimensions of climate change: Epistemology, ontology, and ethics. WIREs Climate Change, 9(4), e526. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.526
Grossmann, I. (2017). Wisdom in Context. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 233- 257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616672066
Grossmann, I.; Brienza, J. P., & Bobocel, D. R. (2017). Wise deliberation sustains cooperation. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0061
Grossmann, I.; Dorfman, A., & Oakes, H. (2020). Wisdom is a social-ecological rather than person-centric phenomenon. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.010
Gugerell, S. H., & Riffert, F. (2011). On Defining «Wisdom»: Baltes, Ardelt, Ryan, and Whitehead. Interchange, 42(3), 225-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-012-9158-7
Habermas, J. (1984). Ciencia y Técnica como «ideología». Editorial Tecnos.
Halverson, R., & Gomez, L. (2001). Phronesis and design: How practical wisdom is disclosed through collaborative design. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA.
Hay, C. (2007). Why we hate politics (Vol. 5). Polity.
Heras, M.; Tabara, J. D., & Meza, A. (2016). Performing biospheric futures with younger generations: A case in the MAB Reserve of La Sepultura, Mexico. Ecology and Society, 21(2).
Hoff, E. V. (2020). Imagination. En S. Pritzker & M. Runco (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (Third Edition) (pp. 617-623). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21897-X
Innerarity Grau, D. (2018). Comprender la Democracia. Gedisa. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=731898
Íñiguez, L., & Antaki, C. (1998). Análisis del discurso. Anthropos, 177, 59-66.
Irwin, T. (2015). Transition Design: A Proposal for a New Area of Design Practice, Study, and Research. Design and Culture, 7(2), 229-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2015.1051829
Irwin, T.; Kossoff, G., & Tonkinwise, C. (2015). Transition Design Provocation. Design Philosophy Papers, 13(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2015.1085688
Irwin, T.; Tonkinwise, C., & Kossoff, G. (2020). Transition Design: The Importance of Everyday Life and Lifestyles as a Leverage Point for Sustainability Transitions. Cuadernos Del Centro de Estudios En Diseño y Comunicación. Ensayos, 105, 67-94.
Jensen, O., & Wu, X. (2016). Embracing Uncertainty in Policy-Making: The Case of the Water Sector. Policy and Society, 35(2), 115-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.07.002.
Jeste, D. V.; Lee, E. E.; Cassidy, C.; Caspari, R.; Gagneux, P.; Glorioso, D.; Miller, B. L.; Semendeferi, K.; Vogler, C.; Nusbaum, H., & Blazer, D. (2019). The New Science of Practical
Wisdom. Perspectives in biology and medicine, 62(2), 216-236. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2019.0011
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
Koberg, D., & Bagnall, J. (1976). The Universal Traveler, A Soft-Systems Guide to: Creativity,Problem Solving, and the Process of Reaching Goals.[Revised Edition.]. William Kaufmann Inc.
Kossoff, G.; Tonkinwise, C., & Irwin, T. (2015). Transition design: The importance of everyday life and lifestyles as a leverage point for sustainability transitions. 6th International Sustainability Transitions Conference.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
Leach, M.; Stirling, A. C., & Scoones, I. (2010). Dynamic sustainabilities: Technology, environment, social justice. Routledge.
Leff, E. (2009). Degrowth, or deconstruction of the economy: Towards a sustainable world. Critical Currents Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation, 6.
Leff, E. L. (2003). La Ecología Política en América Latina: Un campo en construcción. Polis: Revista Latinoamericana, 5, 4.
Lima, J. A. de, & Fazzi, R. de C. (2018). A subjetividade como reflexividade e pluralidade: Notas sobre a centralidade do sujeito nos processos sociais. Sociologias, 20(48), 246-270. https://doi.org/10.1590/15174522-020004814
Loorbach, D.; Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), 599-626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340.
Macintyre, T.; Monroy, T.; Coral, D.; Zethelius, M.; Tassone, V., & Wals, A. E. (2019). T-labs and climate change narratives: Co-researcher qualities in transgressive action–research. Action Research, 17(1), 63-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750319829203
Maxwell, N. (2007). From knowledge to wisdom: The need for an academic revolution. London Review of Education, 5(2), 97-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460701440350.
Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention. En Systemic intervention (pp. 113-133). Springer.
Midgley, G. (2015). Systemic intervention. En The Sage handbook of action research (pp. 157-166). SAGE.
Mierlo, B. C. van; Regeer, B.; Amstel, M. van; Arkesteijn, M. C. M.; Beekman, V.; Bunders, J. F. G.; Cock Buning, T. de; Elzen, B.; Hoes, A. C., & Leeuwis, C. (2010). Reflexive Monitoring in Action. A guide for monitoring system innovation projects (N.o 9789085855996). Communication and Innovation Studies, WUR; Athena Institute, VU. https://edepot.wur.nl/149471.
Montuori, A. (2011). Beyond postnormal times: The future of creativity and the creativity of the future. Futures, 43(2), 221-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.10.013.
Montuori, A., & Donnelly, G. (2020). Creativity and the Future. En S. Pritzker & M. Runco (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (Third Edition) (pp. 250-257). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23855-8.
Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. Verso.
Mouffe, C. (2005). The return of the political (Vol. 8). Verso.
Mouffe, C. (2007). En torno a lo político (N.o 26). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Mulgan, G. (2020). The Imaginary Crisis (and how we might quicken social and public imagination). UCL, Demos Helsinki and Untitled. https://www.demoshelsinki.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/the-imaginary-crisis-web.pdf
Olsson, P.; Galaz, V., & Boonstra, W. J. (2014). Sustainability transformations: A resilience perspective. Ecology and Society, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06799-190401
Österblom, H.; Scheffer, M.; Westley, F. R.; van Esso, M. L.; Miller, J., & Bascompte, J. (2015). A message from magic to science: Seeing how the brain can be tricked may strengthen our thinking. Ecology and Society, 20(4).
Patton, M. Q. (2010). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. Guilford press.
Peters, B. G. (2018). Policy problems and policy design. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pohl, C., & Hadorn, G. H. (2008). Methodological challenges of transdisciplinary research. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 16(2), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2008035
Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time (p. xli). Beacon Press.
Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1994). Frame Reflection Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies (New York: Basic). Basic Books.
Reynolds, M. (2011). Critical thinking and systems thinking: Towards a critical literacy for systems thinking in practice. En C. P. Horvath & J. M. Forte (Eds.), Critical Thinking (pp. 37-68). Nova Science Publishers. https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=20176
Rickards, T. (1980). Designing for creativity: A state of the art review. Design Studies, 1(5), 262-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(80)90059-9
Rivas, L. R. I. (2010). Sabiduría: Diálogo y educación / Wisdom: dialogue and education. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 10(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v10i2.10110
Santos, H. C.; Huynh, A. C., & Grossmann, I. (2017). Wisdom in a complex world: A situated account of wise reasoning and its development. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(10), e12341. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12341
Scheffer, M.; Bascompte, J.; Bjordam, T. K.; Carpenter, S. R.; Clarke, L. B.; Folke, C.; Marquet, P.; Mazzeo, N.; Meerhoff, M., & Sala, O. (2015). Dual thinking for scientists. Ecology and Society, 20(2).
Schön, D. A. (1984). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. 5126). Basic books.
Schwartz, B. (2011). Practical wisdom and organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2011.09.001
Schwartz, B., & Sharpe, K. (2010). Practical wisdom: The right way to do the right thing. Penguin.
Scoones, I., & Stirling, A. (2020). The Politics of Uncertainty: Challenges of Transformation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003023845
Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures. Cambridge University Press.
Steen, M. (2013). Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination. Design Issues, 29(2), 16-28.
Sternberg, R. J. (1998). A Balance Theory of Wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2(4), 347-365. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.4.347
Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Depoliticized Environments: The End of Nature, Climate Change and the Post-Political Condition. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 69, 253-274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246111000300
Turnbull, N. (2006). How should we theorise public policy? Problem solving and problematicity. Policy and Society, 25(2), 3-22.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science (New York, N.Y.), 185(4157), 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical heuristics of social planning: A new approach to practical philosophy.
Ulrich, W., & Reynolds, M. (2010). Critical systems heuristics. En Systems approaches to managing change: A practical guide (pp. 243-292). Springer.
van Mierlo, B., & Beers, P. J. (2020). Understanding and governing learning in sustainability transitions: A review. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 255-269.
Varela, F. J. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford University Press.
Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public understanding of science, 19(3), 258-273.
Walker, B. (2019). Finding Resilience: Change and Uncertainty in Nature and Society. CSIRO PUBLISHING.
Wenger, E. (2011). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Learning in doing, 15(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.2277/0521663636
Wesley-Esquimaux, C., & Calliou, B. (2010). Best practices in Aboriginal community development: A literature review and wise practices approach. The Banff Centre, 1-38.
Westberg, L., & Polk, M. (2016). The role of learning in transdisciplinary research: Moving from a normative concept to an analytical tool through a practice-based approach. Sustainability Science, 11(3), 385-397.
Westley, F., & Laban, S. (2015). Social innovation lab guide. Waterloo Institute for Social Innovation and Resilience. https://uwaterloo.ca/waterloo-institute-for-social-innovation-and-resilience/sites/ca.waterloo-institute-for-social-innovation-and-resilience/files/ uploads/files/10_silabguide_final.pdf
Wiek, A., & Iwaniec, D. (2014). Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 9(4), 497-512.
Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. Abacus.
Žižek, S. (2019). The sublime object of ideology. Verso Books.
Zurbriggen, C. (2011). Gobernanza: Una mirada desde América Latina. Perfiles latinoamericanos, 19(38), 39-64.
Zurbriggen, C., & Lago, M. G. (2019). An experimental evaluation tool for the Public Innovation Lab of the Uruguayan government. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 15(3), 437-451.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista ceden los derechos de autor y de publicación a "Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación", Aceptando el registro de su trabajo bajo una licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que de el crédito pertinente a los autores y a esta revista.
