El cuerpo como punto de encuentro del arte, ciencia, ingeniería y diseño
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi179.8884
Résumé
El esquema de Rich Gold (2007) expone los conceptos de arte, ciencia, diseño e ingeniería como sombreros creativos y plantea sus interrelaciones desde un enfoque práctico: problema-solución para la innovación.
Références
Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the Synthesis of Form (Vol. 5). Harvard University Press.
Ansari, A. (2019). Decolonizing design through the perspectives of cosmological others: Arguing for an ontological turn in design research and practice. In XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students (Vol. 26, Issue 2, pp. 16–19). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/3368048
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Oxford university press.
Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2013). What is “critical” about critical design? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI’13: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. https://doi. org/10.1145/2470654.2466451
Bardzell, S. (2010). Feminist HCI. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’10. the 28th international conference. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521
Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J., Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J., & Antanitis, J. (2012). Critical design and critical theory. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference on - DIS ’12. the Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM Press. https://doi. org/10.1145/2317956.2318001
Benford S, Giannachi G (2011) Performing mixed reality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/ London
Bourdieu, Pierre (1982). “Les rites d’institution.” Ce que parler veut dire, l’économie des échanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard. 121–34.
Butler, J. (2009). Performativity, Precarity and Sexual Politics. AIBR. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 4(3), pp. i-xiii.
Canlı, E. (2018). Binary by Design: Unfolding Corporeal Segregation at the Intersection of Gender, Identity and Materiality. In The Design Journal (Vol. 21, Issue 5, pp. 651–669). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2018.1491716
Canli, E. (2018b). Queering Design: Material Re-Configurations of Body Politics (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade do Porto (Portugal).).
Cerratto-Pargman, T., Rossitto, C., & Barkhuus, L. (2014). Understanding audience participation in an interactive theater performance. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational. NordiCHI ’14: The 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM. https://doi. org/10.1145/2639189.2641213
Dalsgaard, P., & Hansen, L. K. (2008). Performing perception—staging aesthetics of interaction. In ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (Vol. 15, Issue 3, pp. 1–33). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/1453152.1453156
De Lauretis, T. (1987). Technologies of gender: Essays on theory, film, and fiction. Indiana University Press.
DrAlanBarnard (4 de julio 2016) Herbert Simon on How we can study the process of creativity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDn8RXwmvys
Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT press.
Elder, K. E. (2016). From Genderfuck to Nonbinary: Negotiating Gender in Performance (Doctoral dissertation).
Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2016). Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research. In Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (Vol. 22, Issue 1, pp. 35–52). Oxford University Press (OUP). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180
Fearon F (2010) Decoding the audience: a theoretical paradigm for the analysis of the ‘real’ audience and their creation of meaning. About Perform 10:119–135
Findeli, A., Brouillet, D., Martin, S., Moineau, C., & Tarrago, R. (2008). Research through design and transdisciplinarity: A tentative contribution to the methodology of design research.
Fischer-Lichte E (2008) The transformative power of performance: a new aesthetics. Routledge, London
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (Vol. 18).
Gold, R. (2021). The plenitude: Creativity, innovation, and making stuff. Mit Press.
Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of worldmaking (Vol. 51). Hackett Publishing.
Gorny, R. A., & Heuvel, D. V. D. (2017). New Figurations in Architecture Theory: From Queer Performance to Becoming Trans. FOOTPRINT, Issue # 21 | Autumn / Winter 2017 | Trans-Bodies / Queering Spaces. https://doi.org/10.7480/FOOTPRINT.11.2.1897
Hacking, I. (2001) ¿La construcción social de qué? Paidós: Barcelona
Haraway, D. J. (1995). Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres: la reinvención de la naturaleza (Vol. 28). Universitat de València.
Heller, M. (2020). Queering Drag: Redefining the Discourse of Gender-Bending. Indiana University Press.
Hook, K. (2018). Designing with the body: Somaesthetic interaction design. MIT Press.
Höök, K., Jonsson, M. P., Ståhl, A., & Mercurio, J. (2016). Somaesthetic Appreciation Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI’16: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. https://doi. org/10.1145/2858036.2858583
Lee, W., Lim, Y., & Shusterman, R. (2014). Practicing somaesthetics. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. DIS ’14: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2014. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598561
Marcus, A. (2002). Dare we define user-interface design? Interactions, 9(5), 19-24.
Montez, N., & Khubchandani, K. (2020). A Note from the Editors: Queer Pedagogy in Theatre and Performance. In Theatre Topics (Vol. 30, Issue 2, pp. ix–xvii). Project Muse. https://doi.org/10.1353/tt.2020.0026
Neumann, B., & Nünning, A. (Eds.). (2012). Travelling Concepts for the Study of Culture. DE GRUYTER. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110227628
Osiurak, F., Rossetti, Y., & Badets, A. (2017). What is an affordance? 40 years later. In Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (Vol. 77, pp. 403–417). Elsevier BV. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.014
Petersson McIntyre, M. (2018). Gender by Design: Performativity and Consumer Packaging. In Design and Culture (Vol. 10, Issue 3, pp. 337–358). Informa UK Limited. https:// doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2018.1516437
Pierce, J., Sengers, P., Hirsch, T., Jenkins, T., Gaver, W., & DiSalvo, C. (2015). Expanding and Refining Design and Criticality in HCI. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’15: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702438
Preciado, B. (2003). Multitudes queer. Nota para una política de los” anormales”. Nombres, (19).
Reason M (2015) Participations on participation: researching the active theatre audience. Particip J Audience Recept Stud 12(1):271–280
Rosenfeld, K. (2003). Drag King Magic. In Journal of Homosexuality (Vol. 43, Issues 3–4, pp. 201–219). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1300/j082v43n03_13
Rosenqvist, J. (2013). Design as Craft. Performativity and Interpellation in Design History. In 10th European Academy of Design Conference Crafting the Future, Gothenburg. Proceedings (pp. 27-45).
Rupp, L. J., Taylor, V., & Shapiro, E. I. (2010). Drag Queens and Drag Kings: The Difference Gender Makes. In Sexualities (Vol. 13, Issue 3, pp. 275–294). SAGE Publications. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1363460709352725
Rupp, V. T. L. J. (2013). Chicks with Dicks, Men in dresses: What it means to be a drag queen. In The Drag Queen Anthology (pp. 131-152). Routledge.
Schiphorst, T. (2009). soft(n). In CHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’09: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520345
Sheridan, J. G., Bryan-Kinns, N., & Bayliss, A. (2007). Encouraging Witting Participation and Performance in Digital Live Art. In Electronic Workshops in Computing. Proceedings of HCI 2007 The 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference University of Lancaster, UK. BCS Learning & Development. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2007.2
Simon, H. A. (1988). The science of design: Creating the artificial. Design Issues, 67-82.
Spence, J. (2016). Introducing Performative Experience Design. In Performative Experience Design (pp. 1–23). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-28395-1_1
Spiel, K. (2021). The Bodies of TEI – Investigating Norms and Assumptions in the Design of Embodied Interaction. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. TEI ’21: Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM. https://doi. org/10.1145/3430524.3440651
Sun H (2013) Critical design sensibility in postcolonial conditions. Sel Pap Internet Res 14.0(3):1–4
Velten, H. R. (2012). Performativity and performance. Travelling concepts for the study of culture, 2, 249.
Williamson, J. R., Hansen, L. K., Jacucci, G., Light, A., & Reeves, S. (2014). Understanding performative interactions in public settings. In Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (Vol. 18, Issue 7, pp. 1545–1549). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0819-7
Ansari, A. (2019). Decolonizing design through the perspectives of cosmological others: Arguing for an ontological turn in design research and practice. In XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students (Vol. 26, Issue 2, pp. 16–19). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/3368048
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Oxford university press.
Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2013). What is “critical” about critical design? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI’13: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. https://doi. org/10.1145/2470654.2466451
Bardzell, S. (2010). Feminist HCI. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’10. the 28th international conference. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521
Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J., Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J., & Antanitis, J. (2012). Critical design and critical theory. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference on - DIS ’12. the Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM Press. https://doi. org/10.1145/2317956.2318001
Benford S, Giannachi G (2011) Performing mixed reality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/ London
Bourdieu, Pierre (1982). “Les rites d’institution.” Ce que parler veut dire, l’économie des échanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard. 121–34.
Butler, J. (2009). Performativity, Precarity and Sexual Politics. AIBR. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 4(3), pp. i-xiii.
Canlı, E. (2018). Binary by Design: Unfolding Corporeal Segregation at the Intersection of Gender, Identity and Materiality. In The Design Journal (Vol. 21, Issue 5, pp. 651–669). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2018.1491716
Canli, E. (2018b). Queering Design: Material Re-Configurations of Body Politics (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade do Porto (Portugal).).
Cerratto-Pargman, T., Rossitto, C., & Barkhuus, L. (2014). Understanding audience participation in an interactive theater performance. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational. NordiCHI ’14: The 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM. https://doi. org/10.1145/2639189.2641213
Dalsgaard, P., & Hansen, L. K. (2008). Performing perception—staging aesthetics of interaction. In ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (Vol. 15, Issue 3, pp. 1–33). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/1453152.1453156
De Lauretis, T. (1987). Technologies of gender: Essays on theory, film, and fiction. Indiana University Press.
DrAlanBarnard (4 de julio 2016) Herbert Simon on How we can study the process of creativity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDn8RXwmvys
Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT press.
Elder, K. E. (2016). From Genderfuck to Nonbinary: Negotiating Gender in Performance (Doctoral dissertation).
Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2016). Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research. In Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (Vol. 22, Issue 1, pp. 35–52). Oxford University Press (OUP). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180
Fearon F (2010) Decoding the audience: a theoretical paradigm for the analysis of the ‘real’ audience and their creation of meaning. About Perform 10:119–135
Findeli, A., Brouillet, D., Martin, S., Moineau, C., & Tarrago, R. (2008). Research through design and transdisciplinarity: A tentative contribution to the methodology of design research.
Fischer-Lichte E (2008) The transformative power of performance: a new aesthetics. Routledge, London
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (Vol. 18).
Gold, R. (2021). The plenitude: Creativity, innovation, and making stuff. Mit Press.
Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of worldmaking (Vol. 51). Hackett Publishing.
Gorny, R. A., & Heuvel, D. V. D. (2017). New Figurations in Architecture Theory: From Queer Performance to Becoming Trans. FOOTPRINT, Issue # 21 | Autumn / Winter 2017 | Trans-Bodies / Queering Spaces. https://doi.org/10.7480/FOOTPRINT.11.2.1897
Hacking, I. (2001) ¿La construcción social de qué? Paidós: Barcelona
Haraway, D. J. (1995). Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres: la reinvención de la naturaleza (Vol. 28). Universitat de València.
Heller, M. (2020). Queering Drag: Redefining the Discourse of Gender-Bending. Indiana University Press.
Hook, K. (2018). Designing with the body: Somaesthetic interaction design. MIT Press.
Höök, K., Jonsson, M. P., Ståhl, A., & Mercurio, J. (2016). Somaesthetic Appreciation Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI’16: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. https://doi. org/10.1145/2858036.2858583
Lee, W., Lim, Y., & Shusterman, R. (2014). Practicing somaesthetics. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. DIS ’14: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2014. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598561
Marcus, A. (2002). Dare we define user-interface design? Interactions, 9(5), 19-24.
Montez, N., & Khubchandani, K. (2020). A Note from the Editors: Queer Pedagogy in Theatre and Performance. In Theatre Topics (Vol. 30, Issue 2, pp. ix–xvii). Project Muse. https://doi.org/10.1353/tt.2020.0026
Neumann, B., & Nünning, A. (Eds.). (2012). Travelling Concepts for the Study of Culture. DE GRUYTER. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110227628
Osiurak, F., Rossetti, Y., & Badets, A. (2017). What is an affordance? 40 years later. In Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (Vol. 77, pp. 403–417). Elsevier BV. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.014
Petersson McIntyre, M. (2018). Gender by Design: Performativity and Consumer Packaging. In Design and Culture (Vol. 10, Issue 3, pp. 337–358). Informa UK Limited. https:// doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2018.1516437
Pierce, J., Sengers, P., Hirsch, T., Jenkins, T., Gaver, W., & DiSalvo, C. (2015). Expanding and Refining Design and Criticality in HCI. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’15: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702438
Preciado, B. (2003). Multitudes queer. Nota para una política de los” anormales”. Nombres, (19).
Reason M (2015) Participations on participation: researching the active theatre audience. Particip J Audience Recept Stud 12(1):271–280
Rosenfeld, K. (2003). Drag King Magic. In Journal of Homosexuality (Vol. 43, Issues 3–4, pp. 201–219). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1300/j082v43n03_13
Rosenqvist, J. (2013). Design as Craft. Performativity and Interpellation in Design History. In 10th European Academy of Design Conference Crafting the Future, Gothenburg. Proceedings (pp. 27-45).
Rupp, L. J., Taylor, V., & Shapiro, E. I. (2010). Drag Queens and Drag Kings: The Difference Gender Makes. In Sexualities (Vol. 13, Issue 3, pp. 275–294). SAGE Publications. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1363460709352725
Rupp, V. T. L. J. (2013). Chicks with Dicks, Men in dresses: What it means to be a drag queen. In The Drag Queen Anthology (pp. 131-152). Routledge.
Schiphorst, T. (2009). soft(n). In CHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’09: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520345
Sheridan, J. G., Bryan-Kinns, N., & Bayliss, A. (2007). Encouraging Witting Participation and Performance in Digital Live Art. In Electronic Workshops in Computing. Proceedings of HCI 2007 The 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference University of Lancaster, UK. BCS Learning & Development. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2007.2
Simon, H. A. (1988). The science of design: Creating the artificial. Design Issues, 67-82.
Spence, J. (2016). Introducing Performative Experience Design. In Performative Experience Design (pp. 1–23). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-28395-1_1
Spiel, K. (2021). The Bodies of TEI – Investigating Norms and Assumptions in the Design of Embodied Interaction. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. TEI ’21: Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM. https://doi. org/10.1145/3430524.3440651
Sun H (2013) Critical design sensibility in postcolonial conditions. Sel Pap Internet Res 14.0(3):1–4
Velten, H. R. (2012). Performativity and performance. Travelling concepts for the study of culture, 2, 249.
Williamson, J. R., Hansen, L. K., Jacucci, G., Light, A., & Reeves, S. (2014). Understanding performative interactions in public settings. In Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (Vol. 18, Issue 7, pp. 1545–1549). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0819-7
Publiée
2023-02-27
Comment citer
Murga González, A. D. (2023). El cuerpo como punto de encuentro del arte, ciencia, ingeniería y diseño. Cuadernos Del Centro De Estudios De Diseño Y Comunicación, (179). https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi179.8884
Rubrique
Artículos
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista ceden los derechos de autor y de publicación a "Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación", Aceptando el registro de su trabajo bajo una licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que de el crédito pertinente a los autores y a esta revista.
