The Emerging Transition Design Approach
Resumo
Este documento descreve o enfoque do Design para a Transição para abordar problemas complexos como a mudança climática, a perda de biodiversidade, o crime, a pobreza, a contaminação, etc.) e catalisar as transições sociais até um futuro mais sustentável e desejável. Os “wicked problems” são problemas de sistemas que existem nos grandes sistemas sócio técnicos e, portanto, requerem novos enfoques de resolução de problemas. O marco o framework do Design para a Transição reúne um conjunto de práticas em evolução que podem se utilizar para: 1) visualizar e mapear problemas complexos e seus interconexões e interdependências; 2) localizá-los em contextos espaço temporais amplos, 3) identificar e superar os conflitos dos interessados e aproveitar as alienações; 4) facilitar aos interessados na co - criação de visões de futuros desejáveis; 5) identificar os pontos de alavancagem dento do grande sistema de problemas para situar as intervenções de design. O marco do Design em Transição proporciona uma lógica para reunir um conjunto evolutivo de práticas relevantes para o design para o câmbio ao nível dos sistemas. Este documento informa sobre como se está provando este enfoque num projeto comunitário a partir do trabalho em aula oficina.
Referências
Abraham, C., & Michie, S. (2008). A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychology, 27 (3), 379-387. doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.27.3.379
Ajzen I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behaviour. In Kuhl J. & Beckman, J. (Eds.) Action-control: From Cognition to Behaviour. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Ajzen I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
Amatullo, M. (Ed.). (2016). LEAP Dialogues: Career Pathways in Design for Social Innovation. Pasadena, CA: Design matters at Art Center College of Design. Amplifying Creative Communities (2010). Retrieved from Parsons DESIS Lab website: http://www.amplifyingcreativecommunities.org/#p1b
Australian Public Service Commission. (2007). Tackling Wicked Problems: A Public Policy Perspective. Commonwealth of Australia.
Bardwell, L. (1991). Problem-Framing: A Perspective on Environmental Problem-Solving. In Environmental Management, 15, 603-612.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.
Baur, V., Elteren, A., Nierse, C. & Abma, T. (2010). Dealing with Distrust and Power Dynamics: Asymmetric Relations Among Stakeholders in Responsive Evaluation. Evaluation, 16, 233-248.
Berman, M. (1981). The Reenchantment of the World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Bohling, K. (2011). The Multi-Stakeholder Approach in the United Nations: Unprecedented Perhaps, but not Unexpected. Presented at Transnational Private Regulation in the Areas of Health, Environment, Social and Labor Rights. Retrieved from Technische Universitat Munchen, Lehrstuhl fur Wald- und Umweltpolitik website: https://www.wup.wi.tum.de/fileadmin/w00beh/www/Files/Boehling_TransReg_2011.pdf
Bourdieu, P. (1997). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bramwell, B. & Sharman, A. (1991). Collaboration in Local Tourism Policymaking. In Annals of Tourism Research, 26, 392-415.
Brand, S. (1999). The Clock of the Long Now: Time and Responsibility. New York: Basic.
Buchanan, R. (1995) Wicked problems in design thinking. In Margolin, V. and Buchanan, R. (Eds.) The Idea of Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Candy, S., & Dunagan, J. (2017). Designing an Experiential Scenario: The People Who Vanished. Futures, 86, 136-153. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.006.
Candy, S. & Kornet, K. (2017). A Field Guide to Ethnographic Experiential Futures. Journal of Futures Studies, June issue. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30623.97448.
Capra, F. (1996). The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
Capra, F. & Luisi, L. (2014). The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Carlsson-Kanyama, A., Dreborg, K., Moll, H., & Padovan, D. (2008). Participative Backcasting: A Tool for Involving Stakeholders in Local Sustainability Planning. Futures, 40, pp 34-46.
Chatterton, P., Fuller, D., Routledge, P. (2007). Relating Action to Activism: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections. In Kindon, S., Pain, R. & Kesby, M. (Eds.), Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. London: Routledge.
Clarke, M. (2002). In Search of Human Nature. New York: Routledge.
Cornwall, A., Jewkes, R. (1995). What is Participatory Research? In Social Science & Medicine, 41, 1667-1676. Coyne, R. (2005). Wicked Problems Revisited. In Design Studies, 26, pp 5-17.
Debord, G. (2002). Perspectives for Alterations in Everyday Life. In Highmore, B. (Ed.), The Everyday Life Reader. London: Routledge.
Dentoni, D. & Bitzer, V. (2015). The Role of Universities in Dealing with Global Wicked Problems Through Multi- Stakeholder Initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, pp 68-78. de Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California
Press. Dreborg, K. (1996). Essence of Backcasting. Futures, 28, 813-828. Great Britain: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Dunne, A. & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative Everything: Design Fiction and Social Dreaming. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Forrester, J., Swartling, A. & Lonsdale, K. (2008). Stakeholder Engagement and the Work of SEI: An Empirical Study. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm Environment Institute.
Gaziulusoy, I. & Brezet, H. (2015). Design for System Innovations and Transitions: A Conceptual Framework Integrating Insights from Sustainability Science and Theories of System Innovations and Transitions. In Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, pp 558-568.
Geels, F. (2006). Major System Change Through Stepwise Reconfiguration: A Multi-Level Analysis of the Transformation of American Factory Production. InTechnology in Society, 28, pp 445-476.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict (GPPAC). (2015). Multi-Stakeholder Processes for Conflict Prevention & Peacebuilding: A Manual. GPPAC.
Grimble, R. & Wellard, K. (1997). Stakeholder Methodologies in Natural Resource Management: A Review of Principles, Contexts, Experiences and Opportunities. In Agricultural Systems, 55, pp 173-193.
Grin, J., Rotmans, J. & Schot, J. (2010). Conceptual Framework for Analzying Transitions. In Transition to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. New York: Routledge.
Helmerich, N. & Malets, O. (2011). The Multi-Stakeholder Approach in the United Nations: Unprecedented Perhaps, But not Unexpected. Presented at Transnational Private Regulation in the Areas of Health, Environment, Social and Labor Rights conference. Retrieved from the Technische Universitat Munchen website: https://www.wup.wi.tum.de/fileadmin/w00beh/www/Files/Boehling_TransReg_2011.pdf
Hemmati, M. (2002). Multi-stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability: Beyond Deadlock and Conflict. Earthscan Publications, London.
Hughes, L., Steffen, W. (2013). The Critical Decade: Climate Change Science, Risks and Responses. Australia: Climate Commission Secreteriat.
Incropera, F. (2016). Climate change: a wicked problem: complexity and uncertainty at the intersection of science, economic, politics and human behaviour. New York, US: Cambridge University Press.
Author. (2011a). Design for a Sustainable Future. In Hershauer, J., Basile, G. & McNall, S. (Eds.), The Business of Sustainability:Trends, Policies, Practices and Stories of Success, pp. 41-60. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger. Author. (2011b). Wicked Problems and the Relationship Triad. In Harding, S. (Ed.), Grow Small, Think Beautiful. Edinburgh: Floris Books.
Author. (2015). Transition Design: A Proposal for a New Area of Design Practice, Study and Research. In Design and Culture Journal, 7, 229-246.
Author, Tonkinwise, C. & Kossoff, G. (2015). Transition Design: An Educational Framework for Advancing the Study and Design of Sustainable Transitions. Presented at the STRN Conference, University of Sussex. Available on Academia.edu: https://www.academia.edu/15283122/Transition_Design_An_Educational_Framework_for_Advancing_the_Study_and_Design_of_Sustainable_Transitions_presented_at_the_STRN_conference _2015_Sussex_Author (2017). Mapping Ojai’s Water Shortage: A Workshop. Unpublished report, retrieved from Academia.edu website: https://www.academia.edu/30968737/Mapping_Ojais_Water_Shortage_The_First_Workshop_January_2017
Jana, R. (2010, March). IDEO’s Tim Brown on Using Design to Change Behavior. The Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2010/03/design-to-change-behavior-tips
Jensen, L (Ed.). (2017). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2017. New York, NY: United Nations. Kearney, M. (1984). Worldview. Novator: Chandler & Sharp.
Klein, J. (1993). Blurring, Cracking, and Crossing: Permeation and the Fraction of Discipline. In Messer-Davidow, E., Shumway, D., & Sylvan, D. (Eds.), Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity. Charolottsville, NC: University Press of Virginia.
Kossoff, Gideon, 2011. Holism and the Reconstruction of Everyday Life: A Framework for Transition to a Sustainable Society. In Harding, S. (Ed.), Grow Small, Think Beautiful. Edinburgh: Floris Books.
Kossoff, G., Tonkinwise, C. & Author. (2015). The Importance of Everyday Life and Lifestyles as a Leverage Point for Sustainability Transitions. Presented at the STRN Conference, University of Sussex. Available on Academia.edu: https://www.academia.edu/15403946/Transition_Design_The_Importance_of_Everyday_Life_and_Lifestyl es_as_a_Leverage_Point_for_Sustainability_Transitions_presented_at_the_STRN_Conference_2015_Susse x_
Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuijer, L. & De Jong, A. (2011). Practice Theory and Human-Centered Design: A Sustainable Bathing Example. In Proceedings Nordic Design Research Conference (NORDES). Helsinki: Aalto University.
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
Lawhon, M. & Murphy, T. (2011). Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: Insights from political ecology. In Progress in Human Geography, 36, 354-378.
Lent, J. (2017, May). A House on Shaky Ground: Eight Structural Flaws of the Western Worldview. Retrieved from Tikkun website: http://www.tikkun.org/nextgen/a-houseon-shaky-ground-eight-structural-flaws-of-the-western-worldview.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). Critique of Everday Life: Foundations for a Sociology of the Everyday, Vol. 1. London: Verso. Lindley, J. & Coulton, P. (2016). Pushing the Limits of Design Fiction:
The Case For Fictional Research Papers. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ‘16. New York, NY, USA: ACM: 4032–4043. doi:10.1145/2858036.2858446
Loew, P. (2014). Seventh Generation Earth Ethics. Madison. WI: Wisconsin Historical SocietyPress.
Lockton, D., Harrison, D., Cain, R., Stanton, N., & Jennings, P. (2013). Exploring ProblemFraming Through Behavioral Heuristics. In International Journal of Design, 7, 37-53.
Manzini, E. (2015). Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mason, S. & Rychard, S. (2005). Conflict Analysis Tools. Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, SDC. Retrieved from the SDC website: http://www.css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special- interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/Conflict-Analysis-Tools.pdf
Max-Neef, M. (1991). Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections. New York, NY: Apex. Retrieved from http://www.wtf.tw/ref/max-neef.pdf.
Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. Hartland, VT: The Sustainability Institute.
Mumford, L. (1971). The Myth of the Machine: Pentagon of Power. London: Secker & Warburg. Nanus, B. (1992). Visionary Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Niedderer, K., Cain, R., Lockton, D., Ludden, G., Mackrill, J., & Morris, A. (2014). Creating Sustainable Innovation through Design for Behaviour Change: A Full Report. London, UK: The Arts & Humanities Research Council.
Norman, D. & Stappers, P. (2016). DesignX: Complex Sociotechnical Systems. In She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation, 1, pp 83-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2016.01.002
Orr, D. (2002). The Nature of Design: Ecology, Culture and Human Intension. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Penin, L. (2010). Amplifying Creative Communities in New York City. Cumulus Proceedings, Cumulus Shanghai Conference. Retrieved from: https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/30857482/Cumulus_Proceedings_Shanghai.pdf?AW SAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1503862148&Signature=q4nPD9Alh53zTYwlpwyIKq3rRIc%3D&response-content- disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3D2010_Designing_sustainable_sanitation_th.pdf#page=447
Porritt, J. (2013). The World We Made: Alex McKay’s Story from 2050. New York: Phaidon.
Quist, J. & Vergragt, P. (2006). Past and Future of Backcasting: The Shift to Stakeholder Participation and a Proposal for a Methodological Framework. In Futures, 38, pp10-27–1045.
Rawolle, M., Schultheiss, O., Strasser, A. & Kehr, H. 2016. The Motivating Power of Visionary Images: Effects on Motivation, Affect and Behavior. In Journal of Personality, December.
Reed, M., Graves, A., Dandy, N. Stringer, C. (2009). Who’s in and Why? A Typology of Stakeholder Analysis Methods for Natural Resource Management. In Journal of Environmental Management, 90, p 1933-1949.
Rittel, H. & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. In Policy
Sciences, 4, 155-69. Ritzer, G. (2004). The McDonaldization of Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Robinson, J. (1982). Energy Backcasting: A Proposed Method of Policy Analysis. In Energy
Policy, 10, 337-344. Rotmans, J. & Kemp, R. (2003). Managing Societal Transitions: Dilemmas and Uncertainties:The Dutch Energy Case Study. Report from an OECD Workshop on the Benefits of Climate Policy: Improving Information for Policy Makers. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/netherlands/2483769.pdf
Sanders, E. & Stappers, P. (2008). Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design. In CoDesign, 4, pp 5-18. DOI: 10.1080/15710880701875068.
Scott, K., Bakker, C., & Quist, J. (2011). Designing Change by Living Change. In Design Studies Journal, 33, 279-297.
Scott, J. (1998). Seeing Like a State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Sharpe, Bill. (2013). Three Horizons: The Patterning of Hope. Axminster, UK: Triarchy Press.
Shove, E., Walker, G. (2010). Governing Transitions in the Sustainability of Everyday Life. In Research Policy, 39, 471-476.
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Simon M., & Rychard, S. (2005). Conflict Analysis Tools. Retrieved from the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) website http://www.css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/Conflict-Analysis-Tools.pdf
SPREAD. (2012a). Sustainable Lifestyles: Today’s Facts & Tomorrow’s Trends. Report funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme. Retrieved from http://www.sustainable-lifestyles.eu/fileadmin/images/content/D1.1_Baseline_Report.pdf
SPREAD. (2012b). EU Sustainable Lifestyles Roadmap and Action Plan 2050. Report funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme. Retrieved from http://www.sustainable-lifestyles.eu/fileadmin/images/content/Roadmap.pdf
SPREAD. (2012c). Scenarios for Sustainable Lifestyles 2050: From Global Champions to
Local Loops. Report funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme. Retrieved from http://www.sustainable-lifestyles.eu/fileadmin/images/content/D4.1_FourFutureScenarios.pdf
Sterling, B. (2005). Shaping Things. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Trist, E. & Murray, H., (Eds.). (1993). The Social Engagement of Social Science, Vol. 2, The Socio-Technical Perspective. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. Toulmin,
S. (1990). Cosmopolis. New York: The Free Press. Wageningen University. (2017). Needs-Fears Mapping. Retrieved 8.26.17 from Wageningen
University website: http://www.managingforimpact.org/tool/needs-fears-mapping
Wheatley, M., & Kellner-Rogers, M. (1996). A Simpler Way. San Francisco, CA: BerrettKoehler Publishers. Winterhouse Institute. (2017). Social Design Pathways. Retrieved from http://winterhouseinstitute.squarespace.com/pathways/
Woodhouse, M. (1996). Paradigm Wars: Worldviews for a New Age. Berkeley: Frog.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista ceden los derechos de autor y de publicación a "Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación", Aceptando el registro de su trabajo bajo una licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que de el crédito pertinente a los autores y a esta revista.
