La des-materialización de productos tangibles en una perspectiva de sustentabilidad

  • Gabriela Nuri Barón
Keywords: servicization; collaboration; unfinishedness; systemic approach; well-being; consumption; dematerialization; sustainable development

Abstract

In the practice of future scenario forecasting for a sustainable development, the western free market paradigms are becoming deeply threatened by our ecological limits. It is clear now that the environmental crisis is directly linked to consumption and cannot be tackled with traditional technical responses. The most promising innovations that present viable solutions to the environmental crisis are of social nature. Within this perspective, Designers seem to have arrived to a dead-end road in relation to material creation. Far from discouraging, these limits have shed light on a whole new spectrum of professional opportunities towards social-well-being, where Designers have the lead as creative facilitators. Dematerialization becomes a challenging, attractive and viable course of action, placing people as the primary material for change.

References

Dooley, K. (2013). Product design: Do it with Dematerialization. CSR Wire, 14-16. Retrieved from: http://www.csrwire.com/blog/posts/1078-product-design-do-it-withdematerialization

EU - European Union (2010). Making sustainable consumption and production a reality. ISBN: 978-92-79-14357-1 DOI: 10.2779/91521. Available at http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/making-sustainable-consumption-and-production-a-reality-pbKH3109259/

FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2003). The state of food insecurity in the world. ISBN 92-5-104986-6. Rome, Italy.

Forrester, J. W. (1994). System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR. Syst. Dyn. Rev., 10: 245-256. doi:10.1002/sdr.4260100211

Hamilton, C. (2010). Consumerism, self-creation and prospects for a new ecological consciousness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 571–575. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.013

Manzini, E. (1994). Physis and design. Interaction between nature and culture. Article available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/39085531. Retrieved on: 02 August 2016

Marttila, T. (2011). Dematerialization by Design - Sustainability in the consumer society. Position paper for ARKTIS Summer School 2011. Design Connections Doctoral Program. Aalto University, School of Art and Design.

Moore, D.; Galli, A.; Cranston, G. R. and Reed, A. (2012). Projecting future human demand on the Earth’s regenerative capacity. Ecological Indicators, 16, 100–112. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.017

Oliva, R. and Kallenberg, R. (2003). Managing the transition from products to services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 160-172.

Stahel W. (2001). Sustainability and Services, in Sustainable Solutions - Developing products and services for the future, Charter, M. and Tischner, U. (edit by), Greenleaf publishing, UK.

Tukker, A. (2004). Eight types of product-service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from suspronet, Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 13, no. 4

UNEP (2011). Prepared by Meghan O’Brien and Stefan Bringezu, Wuppertal Institute. Draft Glossary of Terms Used by the International Resource Panel. Page 3.

Vezzoli, C. (2007). System Design for Sustainability. Milano: Maggioli Editore.

Vezzoli, C., & Manzini, E. (2008). Design for Environmental Sustainability. London: Springer London. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-163-3.

Weizaker, E. i C., Von (1988). Come vivere con gli errori. II valore evolutivo degli errori. Ceruti, M., Laszlo, E.

Published
2019-09-26
How to Cite
Nuri Barón, G. (2019). La des-materialización de productos tangibles en una perspectiva de sustentabilidad. Cuadernos Del Centro De Estudios De Diseño Y Comunicación, (70), 45 a 52. https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi70.1128