A Vocabulary for Visions in Designing for Transitions
Resumen
Las “visiones de futuros sostenibles” se han propuesto como un componente clave del diseño para la transición, “un medio a través del cual los estilos de vida contemporáneos y las intervenciones de diseño pueden evaluarse y criticarse contra la visualización de un futuro deseado” (Irwin et al, 2015a, p. 8). Tales ambiciones son necesariamente de amplio alcance, y requieren unir líneas sobre el diseño y la especulación de diversas fuentes. Aquí buscamos aumentar el impulso explorando un conjunto de conceptos que se relacionan particularmente con este papel de visión en el diseño de transiciones. Sobre la base de perspectivas y proyectos de otros campos, presentamos elementos de un vocabulario visionario, que abarca diferentes escalas y grados de eliminación del presente, y la ubicación de estos términos en relación con los desafíos específicos y las oportunidades para el pensamiento y la práctica de la transición.
Citas
Aguirre Ulloa, M., Paulsen, A. (2017). Co-designing with relationships in mind: Introducing relational material mapping. Form Akademisk 10(1) pp. 1-14.
Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., Angel, S. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press
Alter, L. (2016). Get your hit of nature inside your home or office with NaturePod. Treehugger. Retrieved from http://www.treehugger.com/sustainable-product-design/get-your-hitnature-inside-your-home-or-office-naturepod.html
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Public Culture, 2(2), 1-24.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps toward an ecology of mind. San Francisco: Chandler.
Bateson, M.C. (1984). With a Daughter’s Eye: A Memoir of Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson. New York: William Morrow.
Baumgartner, P., Gruber-Muecke, T., Sickinger, R. (Eds.). (2017). Pursuit of Pattern Languages for Societal Change: Designing Lively Scenarios in Various Fields (2nd ed). Krems, Austria: Edition Donau-Universität Krems.
Boal, A. (2002). Games for actors and non-actors (2nd ed, translated by A. Jackson). London: Routledge.
Bowden, F., Lockton, D., Gheerawo, R., Brass, C. (2015). Drawing Energy: Exploring Perceptions of the Invisible. London: Royal College of Art.
Box, G. E. P., Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces. New York, NY: Wiley.
Brooks, F. P. (1975). The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Candy, S. (2010). The futures of everyday life. (PhD dissertation). University of Hawaii at Manoa. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.1840.0248
Candy, S. (2013). Time machine / reverse archaeology. In C. Briggs (Ed.). 72 Assignments: The foundation course in art and design today. Paris: PCA Press, pp. 28-30.
Candy, S. (2014). Experiential futures. The futurist, 48(5): 34-37.
Candy, S. (2015). The thing from the future. In A. Curry (Ed.). The APF methods anthology. London: Association of Professional Futurists, pp. 18-21.
Candy, S., Dator, J., Dunagan, J. (2006). Four futures for Hawaii 2050. Honolulu: Hawaii Research Center for Futures Studies.
Candy, S., Dunagan, J. (2017). Designing an experiential scenario: The people who vanished. Futures, 86: 136-153.
Candy, S., Kornet, K. (2017). Ethnographic experiential futures. Toronto: Situation Lab. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.30623.97448.
Carter, F., Mata-Marin, S., Onafuwa, D., Ansari, A., Lockton, D. (2017). Changing behavior of the systems we’re in: Designing for transitions in Environment, Economy, and Democracy. RSD6: Relating Systems Thinking and Design 6 Symposium, 18-20 October 2017, Oslo.
Cila, N. (2013). Metaphors we design by: The use of metaphors in product design. PhD thesis, TU Delft.
Clark, A., Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1): 7-19.
Conant, R. C., Ashby, W.R. (1970). Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. International Journal of Systems Science, 1(2), 89-97.
Conway, M. E. (1968). How do committees invent? Datamation, April 1968, pp. 28-31.
Curry, A.; Hodgson, A. (2008). Seeing in multiple horizons: Connecting futures to strategy. Journal of Futures Studies, 13(1): 1-20.
Dator, J. (1979). The futures of culture or cultures of the future. In A. J. Marsella, R. G. Tharp, T. J. Ciboroski (Eds.). Perspectives on cross-cultural psychology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 369-388.
Dator, J. (1996). Foreword. In R. Slaughter (Ed.). The knowledge base of futures studies (3 Vols.) Hawthorn, Australia: DDM Media Group.
Dator, J. (2009). Alternative futures at the Manoa School. Journal of Futures Studies, 14(2), 1-18.
De Bono, E. (1977). Wordpower: An illustrated dictionary of vital words. New York: Harper.
Dennett, D.C. (2013). Intuition pumps and other tools for thinking. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
Dilnot, C. (2015). History, Design, Futures: Contending with what we have made. In: Fry, T., Dilnot, C., Stewart, S.C., Design and the question of history. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 131-272.
Dubberly, H.; Pangaro, P. (2007). Cybernetics and service-craft: Language for behaviorfocused design. Kybernetes, 36(9), pp. 1301-1317.
Dunagan, J. (2015). Who owns the extended mind?: The neuropolitics of intellectual property law. In M. David D. Halbert (Eds.). The Sage handbook of intellectual property. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp. 689-707.
Dunne, A. (2006). Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Easterling, K. (2014). Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. London: Verso.
Eno, B., Schmidt, P. (1975). Oblique Strategies: Over 100 Worthwhile Dilemmas. (Card deck). London: Apollo.
Erard, M. (2015). See Through Words: The metaphor designer isn’t trying to make something beautiful. She wants to change your view on things. Here’s how. Aeon, 9 June 2015. Available at https://aeon.co/essays/how-to-build-a-metaphor-to-change-people-s-minds
Fincher, S. (2012). Some Roles of Patterns and Pattern Languages in the Capture and Transfer of Design Knowledge. Working paper, available at https://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/ saf/patterns/WhyDoPatternsWork.pdf
Finidori, H., et al. (2015). The PLAST Project: Pattern Languages for Systemic Transformation. Spanda Journal, 1(1), 205-218.
Funk, J. (2017). Assessing public forecasts to encourage accountability: The case of MIT’s Technology Review. PLoS ONE 12(8). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183038
Furness, D. (2017). Here’s a Baby VR Headset for the Parents of the Future. Vice Creators Project. Retrieved from https://creators.vice.com/en_us/article/d38adx/baby-vr-headsetfuture-parents-stuart-candy
Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J. (1994). Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
German, E. (2017). Every future we think of follows one of four narratives. Quartz. Retrieved from https://qz.com/1110771/every-future-we-think-of-follows-one-of-four-narratives/
Glanville, R. (1995). A cybernetic musing: Control 2. Cybernetics & human knowing 3(2), pp. 43-46
Graeber, D. (2015). The utopia of rules: On technology, stupidity, and the secret joys of bureaucracy. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.
Griffith, S. (2008, October 30). Presentation at Pop!Tech. Retrieved from http://vimeo.com/7081438
Group Pattern Language Project. (2011). Group Works: A Pattern Language for Bringing Life to Meetings and Other Gatherings (Card deck). https://groupworksdeck.org/deck
Halprin, L. (1970). The RSVP cycles: Creative processes in the human environment. New York: George Braziller.
Harari, Y.N. (2014). Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. New York: Harper.
Hayles, N.K. (2001). Desiring Agency: Limiting Metaphors and Enabling Constraints in Dawkins and Deleuze/Guattari. SubStance # 94/95, pp. 144-159.
Hayward, P., Candy, S. (2017). The Polak Game, Or: Where Do You Stand? Manuscript submitted for publication.
Hekkert, P., Cila, N. (2015). Handle with care! Why and how designers make use of product metaphors. Design Studies 40, pp. 196-217.
Hodgson, T., Sharpe, B. (2007). Deepening Futures with System Structure. In B. Sharpe K. van der Heijden (Eds.), Scenarios for success: Turning insights into action. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Hofstadter, D.R. (2001). Analogy as the core of cognition. In: D. Gentner, K.J. Holyoak, B.N. Kokinov (eds.), The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 499-538.
Hill, D. (2012). Dark matter and trojan horses: A strategic design vocabulary. Moscow: Strelka Press.
Hendricks, D. (2014). Systems Mythology Toolkit (SR-1675C). Palo Alto, CA: Institute for the Future.
Irwin, T., Kossoff, G., Tonkinwise, C., Scupelli, P. (2015a). Transition Design. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon School of Design.
Irwin, T., Kossoff, G., Tonkinwise, C. (2015b). Transition Design Provocation. Design Philosophy Papers 13(1), pp. 3-11.
Jasanoff, S., Kim, S-H. (2015). Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jones, N. A., Ross, H., Lynam, T. , Perez, P., Leitch, A. (2011). Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society 16(1): art. no. 46
Jung, H., Wiltse, H., Wiberg, M. (2017). Metaphors, materialities, and affordances: Hybrid morphologies in the design of interactive artifacts. Design Studies, in press.
Kahn, H. (1962). In Defence of Thinking. In P.D. Aligica K.R. Weinstein (Eds.). (2009). The essential Herman Kahn: In defense of thinking. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. London: Hutchinson.
Kossoff, G. (2015). Holism and the reconstitution of everyday life: a framework for transition to a sustainable society. Design Philosophy Papers, 13(1), pp. 25-38.
Kossoff, G., Irwin, T., Willis, A-M. (2015). Transition Design. Design Philosophy Papers, 13(1), pp. 1-2.
Krippendorff, K. (2006). The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Lakoff, G. (2014). The All New Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Hartford, VT: Chelsea Green.
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lambert, S. (2009.) Best case scenario. Fillip 9. Retrieved from http://fillip.ca/content/bestcase-scenario
Landau, M.J., Keefer, L.A. (2014). The Persuasive Power of Political Metaphors. In: P. Forgas, W. Crano, & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Social Psychology and Politics. New York: Psychology Press
Lanier, J. (1995). Agents of Alienation. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2, pp. 76-81.
Lanzeni, D. (2016). Smart global futures: Designing affordable materialities for a better life. In S. Pink, E. Ardèvol, D. Lanzeni (eds.), Digital Materialities: Design and Anthropology. London: Bloomsbury.
Le Dantec, C.A., DiSalvo, C. (2013). Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science 43(2), p. 241-264.
Levitas, R. (2013). Utopia as Method: The Imaginary Reconstitution of Society. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Lockton, D. (2016). Frustrated Models. In: Borland, R., Scarff, L., Brunswick, I. (eds.), Design and Violence Zine #2. Dublin: Science Gallery / MoMA, pp. 12-15.
Lockton, D. (forthcoming). New Metaphors for Designing Qualitative Interfaces. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Lockton, D., Harrison, D., Stanton, N.A. (2010). Design with Intent: 101 Patterns for Influencing Behavior Through Design v.1.0, Windsor: Equifine.
Lockton, D., Harrison, D., Stanton, N.A. (2012) Models of the user: designers’ perspectives on influencing sustainable behavior. Journal of Design Research 10(1/2), 7-27.
Lockton, D., Harrison, D., Stanton, N.A. (2013) Exploring design patterns for sustainable behavior. The Design Journal 16(4), 431-459.
Lockton, D., Ranner, V. (2017). Plans and speculated actions: Design, behavior and complexity in sustainable futures. In: Chapman, J. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Product Design. London: Routledge, pp. 487-501.
Mata-Marin, S., Lockton, D. (2017). Technologies of Division: Everyday Bordering. NORDES 2017: 7th Nordic Design Research Conference, 15-17 June 2017, Oslo.
McLuhan, M. (1967). The relation of environment to anti-environment. In F.W. Matson A. Montagu (Eds.). The human dialogue: Perspectives on communication. New York: The Free Press, pp. 39-47.
Merton, R.K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8(2), pp. 193-210.
Merton, R.K. (1995). The Thomas Theorem and The Matthew Effect. Social Forces 74(2), pp. 379-424.
Metcalf, S. (2017). Neoliberalism: the idea that swallowed the world. The Guardian, 18 August 2017. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/aug/18/neoliberalism-theidea-that-changed-the-world
Moyers, B. (1988). A World of Ideas: Catherine Bateson: Gender and the Mixed Workplace. Available at: http://billmoyers.com/content/catherine-bateson-gender-roles/
Polak, F. (1973). The image of the future (translated and abridged by E. Boulding). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Revell, K.M.A., Stanton, N.A. (2017). Mental models: Design of user interaction and interfaces for domestic energy systems. London: Taylor & Francis.
Robinson, J.B. (1982). Energy backcasting: A proposed method of policy analysis. Energy Policy, 10(4), 337-344.
Robinson, J., Burch, S., Talwar, S., O’Shea, M., Walsh, M. (2011). Envisioning sustainability: Recent progress in the use of participatory backcasting approaches for sustainability research. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 78, 756-768.
Saffer, D. (2005). The Role of Metaphor in Interaction Design. Master’s thesis, Carnegie Mellon School of Design.
Schell, J. (2008). The art of game design: A book of lenses. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Schön, D.A. (1979). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In: Ortony, A. (ed.). Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 137-163.
Scott, B. (2017). Cybernetic foundations for psychology. In: A. Riegler, K.H. Müller, S.A. Umpleby (eds.), New Horizons For Second-order Cybernetics. Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 119-133.
Silver, N. (2012). The signal and the noise: Why so many predictions fail - but some don’t. New York: Penguin Press.
Star, S.L., Bowker, G.C. (2002). How to Infrastructure. In L.A. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone (eds.), The Handbook of New Media. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 230-245.
Taleb, N.N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York: Random House.
Tetlock, P.E., Gardner, D. (2015). Superforecasting: The art and science of prediction. New York: Broadway Books.
Textor, R.B. (1995). The ethnographic futures research method: an application to Thailand. Futures 27(4), 461-471.
Thomas, W.I., Thomas, D.S. (1928). The Child In America: Behavior Problems And Programs. New York: Alfred Knopf.
Tidwell, J. (2005). Designing interfaces. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
Wahl, D.C. (2016). Designing regenerative cultures. Axminster, England: Triarchy Press.
White, D. (2015). Metaphors, hybridity, failure and work: a sympathetic appraisal of Transitional Design. Design Philosophy Papers 13(1), pp. 39-50.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista ceden los derechos de autor y de publicación a "Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación", Aceptando el registro de su trabajo bajo una licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que de el crédito pertinente a los autores y a esta revista.
