A Vocabulary for Visions in Designing for Transitions
Resumo
as visões de futuros sustentáveis se propuseram como componente chave do design para a transição, um meio através do qual os estilos de vida contemporâneos e as intervenções do design podem ser avaliadas e criticadas contra a visualização de um futuro desejado (Irwin et al, 2015a). Essas ambições são necessariamente de amplo alcance, e requerem unir linhas sobre o design e a especulação de diversas fontes. Aqui procuramos aumentar o impulso explorando um conjunto de conceitos que se relacionam particularmente com o papel de visão no design de transições. A partir de perspectivas e projetos de outros campos, apresentamos elementos de um vocabulário visionário, que abarca diferentes escalas e graus de eliminação do presente, e a localização destes términos em relação com os desafios específicos e as oportunidades para o pensamento e a prática da transição.
Referências
Aguirre Ulloa, M., Paulsen, A. (2017). Co-designing with relationships in mind: Introducing relational material mapping. Form Akademisk 10(1) pp. 1-14.
Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., Angel, S. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press
Alter, L. (2016). Get your hit of nature inside your home or office with NaturePod. Treehugger. Retrieved from http://www.treehugger.com/sustainable-product-design/get-your-hitnature-inside-your-home-or-office-naturepod.html
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Public Culture, 2(2), 1-24.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps toward an ecology of mind. San Francisco: Chandler.
Bateson, M.C. (1984). With a Daughter’s Eye: A Memoir of Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson. New York: William Morrow.
Baumgartner, P., Gruber-Muecke, T., Sickinger, R. (Eds.). (2017). Pursuit of Pattern Languages for Societal Change: Designing Lively Scenarios in Various Fields (2nd ed). Krems, Austria: Edition Donau-Universität Krems.
Boal, A. (2002). Games for actors and non-actors (2nd ed, translated by A. Jackson). London: Routledge.
Bowden, F., Lockton, D., Gheerawo, R., Brass, C. (2015). Drawing Energy: Exploring Perceptions of the Invisible. London: Royal College of Art.
Box, G. E. P., Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces. New York, NY: Wiley.
Brooks, F. P. (1975). The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Candy, S. (2010). The futures of everyday life. (PhD dissertation). University of Hawaii at Manoa. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.1840.0248
Candy, S. (2013). Time machine / reverse archaeology. In C. Briggs (Ed.). 72 Assignments: The foundation course in art and design today. Paris: PCA Press, pp. 28-30.
Candy, S. (2014). Experiential futures. The futurist, 48(5): 34-37.
Candy, S. (2015). The thing from the future. In A. Curry (Ed.). The APF methods anthology. London: Association of Professional Futurists, pp. 18-21.
Candy, S., Dator, J., Dunagan, J. (2006). Four futures for Hawaii 2050. Honolulu: Hawaii Research Center for Futures Studies.
Candy, S., Dunagan, J. (2017). Designing an experiential scenario: The people who vanished. Futures, 86: 136-153.
Candy, S., Kornet, K. (2017). Ethnographic experiential futures. Toronto: Situation Lab. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.30623.97448.
Carter, F., Mata-Marin, S., Onafuwa, D., Ansari, A., Lockton, D. (2017). Changing behavior of the systems we’re in: Designing for transitions in Environment, Economy, and Democracy. RSD6: Relating Systems Thinking and Design 6 Symposium, 18-20 October 2017, Oslo.
Cila, N. (2013). Metaphors we design by: The use of metaphors in product design. PhD thesis, TU Delft.
Clark, A., Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1): 7-19.
Conant, R. C., Ashby, W.R. (1970). Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. International Journal of Systems Science, 1(2), 89-97.
Conway, M. E. (1968). How do committees invent? Datamation, April 1968, pp. 28-31.
Curry, A.; Hodgson, A. (2008). Seeing in multiple horizons: Connecting futures to strategy. Journal of Futures Studies, 13(1): 1-20.
Dator, J. (1979). The futures of culture or cultures of the future. In A. J. Marsella, R. G. Tharp, T. J. Ciboroski (Eds.). Perspectives on cross-cultural psychology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 369-388.
Dator, J. (1996). Foreword. In R. Slaughter (Ed.). The knowledge base of futures studies (3 Vols.) Hawthorn, Australia: DDM Media Group.
Dator, J. (2009). Alternative futures at the Manoa School. Journal of Futures Studies, 14(2), 1-18.
De Bono, E. (1977). Wordpower: An illustrated dictionary of vital words. New York: Harper.
Dennett, D.C. (2013). Intuition pumps and other tools for thinking. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
Dilnot, C. (2015). History, Design, Futures: Contending with what we have made. In: Fry, T., Dilnot, C., Stewart, S.C., Design and the question of history. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 131-272.
Dubberly, H.; Pangaro, P. (2007). Cybernetics and service-craft: Language for behaviorfocused design. Kybernetes, 36(9), pp. 1301-1317.
Dunagan, J. (2015). Who owns the extended mind?: The neuropolitics of intellectual property law. In M. David D. Halbert (Eds.). The Sage handbook of intellectual property. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp. 689-707.
Dunne, A. (2006). Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Easterling, K. (2014). Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. London: Verso.
Eno, B., Schmidt, P. (1975). Oblique Strategies: Over 100 Worthwhile Dilemmas. (Card deck). London: Apollo.
Erard, M. (2015). See Through Words: The metaphor designer isn’t trying to make something beautiful. She wants to change your view on things. Here’s how. Aeon, 9 June 2015. Available at https://aeon.co/essays/how-to-build-a-metaphor-to-change-people-s-minds
Fincher, S. (2012). Some Roles of Patterns and Pattern Languages in the Capture and Transfer of Design Knowledge. Working paper, available at https://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/ saf/patterns/WhyDoPatternsWork.pdf
Finidori, H., et al. (2015). The PLAST Project: Pattern Languages for Systemic Transformation. Spanda Journal, 1(1), 205-218.
Funk, J. (2017). Assessing public forecasts to encourage accountability: The case of MIT’s Technology Review. PLoS ONE 12(8). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183038
Furness, D. (2017). Here’s a Baby VR Headset for the Parents of the Future. Vice Creators Project. Retrieved from https://creators.vice.com/en_us/article/d38adx/baby-vr-headsetfuture-parents-stuart-candy
Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J. (1994). Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
German, E. (2017). Every future we think of follows one of four narratives. Quartz. Retrieved from https://qz.com/1110771/every-future-we-think-of-follows-one-of-four-narratives/
Glanville, R. (1995). A cybernetic musing: Control 2. Cybernetics & human knowing 3(2), pp. 43-46
Graeber, D. (2015). The utopia of rules: On technology, stupidity, and the secret joys of bureaucracy. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.
Griffith, S. (2008, October 30). Presentation at Pop!Tech. Retrieved from http://vimeo.com/7081438
Group Pattern Language Project. (2011). Group Works: A Pattern Language for Bringing Life to Meetings and Other Gatherings (Card deck). https://groupworksdeck.org/deck
Halprin, L. (1970). The RSVP cycles: Creative processes in the human environment. New York: George Braziller.
Harari, Y.N. (2014). Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. New York: Harper.
Hayles, N.K. (2001). Desiring Agency: Limiting Metaphors and Enabling Constraints in Dawkins and Deleuze/Guattari. SubStance # 94/95, pp. 144-159.
Hayward, P., Candy, S. (2017). The Polak Game, Or: Where Do You Stand? Manuscript submitted for publication.
Hekkert, P., Cila, N. (2015). Handle with care! Why and how designers make use of product metaphors. Design Studies 40, pp. 196-217.
Hodgson, T., Sharpe, B. (2007). Deepening Futures with System Structure. In B. Sharpe K. van der Heijden (Eds.), Scenarios for success: Turning insights into action. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Hofstadter, D.R. (2001). Analogy as the core of cognition. In: D. Gentner, K.J. Holyoak, B.N. Kokinov (eds.), The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 499-538.
Hill, D. (2012). Dark matter and trojan horses: A strategic design vocabulary. Moscow: Strelka Press.
Hendricks, D. (2014). Systems Mythology Toolkit (SR-1675C). Palo Alto, CA: Institute for the Future.
Irwin, T., Kossoff, G., Tonkinwise, C., Scupelli, P. (2015a). Transition Design. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon School of Design.
Irwin, T., Kossoff, G., Tonkinwise, C. (2015b). Transition Design Provocation. Design Philosophy Papers 13(1), pp. 3-11.
Jasanoff, S., Kim, S-H. (2015). Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jones, N. A., Ross, H., Lynam, T. , Perez, P., Leitch, A. (2011). Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society 16(1): art. no. 46
Jung, H., Wiltse, H., Wiberg, M. (2017). Metaphors, materialities, and affordances: Hybrid morphologies in the design of interactive artifacts. Design Studies, in press.
Kahn, H. (1962). In Defence of Thinking. In P.D. Aligica K.R. Weinstein (Eds.). (2009). The essential Herman Kahn: In defense of thinking. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. London: Hutchinson.
Kossoff, G. (2015). Holism and the reconstitution of everyday life: a framework for transition to a sustainable society. Design Philosophy Papers, 13(1), pp. 25-38.
Kossoff, G., Irwin, T., Willis, A-M. (2015). Transition Design. Design Philosophy Papers, 13(1), pp. 1-2.
Krippendorff, K. (2006). The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Lakoff, G. (2014). The All New Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Hartford, VT: Chelsea Green.
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lambert, S. (2009.) Best case scenario. Fillip 9. Retrieved from http://fillip.ca/content/bestcase-scenario
Landau, M.J., Keefer, L.A. (2014). The Persuasive Power of Political Metaphors. In: P. Forgas, W. Crano, & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Social Psychology and Politics. New York: Psychology Press
Lanier, J. (1995). Agents of Alienation. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2, pp. 76-81.
Lanzeni, D. (2016). Smart global futures: Designing affordable materialities for a better life. In S. Pink, E. Ardèvol, D. Lanzeni (eds.), Digital Materialities: Design and Anthropology. London: Bloomsbury.
Le Dantec, C.A., DiSalvo, C. (2013). Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science 43(2), p. 241-264.
Levitas, R. (2013). Utopia as Method: The Imaginary Reconstitution of Society. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Lockton, D. (2016). Frustrated Models. In: Borland, R., Scarff, L., Brunswick, I. (eds.), Design and Violence Zine #2. Dublin: Science Gallery / MoMA, pp. 12-15.
Lockton, D. (forthcoming). New Metaphors for Designing Qualitative Interfaces. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Lockton, D., Harrison, D., Stanton, N.A. (2010). Design with Intent: 101 Patterns for Influencing Behavior Through Design v.1.0, Windsor: Equifine.
Lockton, D., Harrison, D., Stanton, N.A. (2012) Models of the user: designers’ perspectives on influencing sustainable behavior. Journal of Design Research 10(1/2), 7-27.
Lockton, D., Harrison, D., Stanton, N.A. (2013) Exploring design patterns for sustainable behavior. The Design Journal 16(4), 431-459.
Lockton, D., Ranner, V. (2017). Plans and speculated actions: Design, behavior and complexity in sustainable futures. In: Chapman, J. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Product Design. London: Routledge, pp. 487-501.
Mata-Marin, S., Lockton, D. (2017). Technologies of Division: Everyday Bordering. NORDES 2017: 7th Nordic Design Research Conference, 15-17 June 2017, Oslo.
McLuhan, M. (1967). The relation of environment to anti-environment. In F.W. Matson A. Montagu (Eds.). The human dialogue: Perspectives on communication. New York: The Free Press, pp. 39-47.
Merton, R.K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8(2), pp. 193-210.
Merton, R.K. (1995). The Thomas Theorem and The Matthew Effect. Social Forces 74(2), pp. 379-424.
Metcalf, S. (2017). Neoliberalism: the idea that swallowed the world. The Guardian, 18 August 2017. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/aug/18/neoliberalism-theidea-that-changed-the-world
Moyers, B. (1988). A World of Ideas: Catherine Bateson: Gender and the Mixed Workplace. Available at: http://billmoyers.com/content/catherine-bateson-gender-roles/
Polak, F. (1973). The image of the future (translated and abridged by E. Boulding). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Revell, K.M.A., Stanton, N.A. (2017). Mental models: Design of user interaction and interfaces for domestic energy systems. London: Taylor & Francis.
Robinson, J.B. (1982). Energy backcasting: A proposed method of policy analysis. Energy Policy, 10(4), 337-344.
Robinson, J., Burch, S., Talwar, S., O’Shea, M., Walsh, M. (2011). Envisioning sustainability: Recent progress in the use of participatory backcasting approaches for sustainability research. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 78, 756-768.
Saffer, D. (2005). The Role of Metaphor in Interaction Design. Master’s thesis, Carnegie Mellon School of Design.
Schell, J. (2008). The art of game design: A book of lenses. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Schön, D.A. (1979). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In: Ortony, A. (ed.). Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 137-163.
Scott, B. (2017). Cybernetic foundations for psychology. In: A. Riegler, K.H. Müller, S.A. Umpleby (eds.), New Horizons For Second-order Cybernetics. Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 119-133.
Silver, N. (2012). The signal and the noise: Why so many predictions fail - but some don’t. New York: Penguin Press.
Star, S.L., Bowker, G.C. (2002). How to Infrastructure. In L.A. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone (eds.), The Handbook of New Media. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 230-245.
Taleb, N.N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York: Random House.
Tetlock, P.E., Gardner, D. (2015). Superforecasting: The art and science of prediction. New York: Broadway Books.
Textor, R.B. (1995). The ethnographic futures research method: an application to Thailand. Futures 27(4), 461-471.
Thomas, W.I., Thomas, D.S. (1928). The Child In America: Behavior Problems And Programs. New York: Alfred Knopf.
Tidwell, J. (2005). Designing interfaces. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
Wahl, D.C. (2016). Designing regenerative cultures. Axminster, England: Triarchy Press.
White, D. (2015). Metaphors, hybridity, failure and work: a sympathetic appraisal of Transitional Design. Design Philosophy Papers 13(1), pp. 39-50.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista ceden los derechos de autor y de publicación a "Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación", Aceptando el registro de su trabajo bajo una licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que de el crédito pertinente a los autores y a esta revista.
