Transition Design: Teaching and Learning

Stacie Rohrbach; Molly Steenson

doi:10.18682/cdc.vi73.1047

Stacie Rohrbach
Molly Steenson

##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##: https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi73.1047

Résumé

Para el desarrollo del Diseño para la Transición, resulta fundamental su base en la Educación Superior. La base teórica que informa la práctica del Diseño para la Transición se desarrolla a partir de un proceso emergente compuesto de hipótesis, teoría y pruebas en entornos educativos. Estos enfoques, que se centran en abordar desafíos específicos, complejos y basados en la localización, deben adaptarse para abordar la naturaleza de contextos específicos y el aprendizaje variado de las cohortes de alumnos y sus respectivas necesidades. Este documento argumenta la importancia y la integración cuidadosa del Diseño para la Transición en la educación de diseño, e introduce un plan de estudios para estudiantes de diseño de pregrado y doctorado. Describe los métodos y herramientas que se utilizan en nuestra enseñanza, describe los éxitos, identifica los desafíos, presenta ideas para mejorar y propone oportunidades para el desarrollo.

Références

Candy, S. (2010). The futures of everyday life: Politics and the design of experiential scenarios (Doctoral dissertation) University of Hawaii, Manoa.

Capra, F. (1983). The turning point: Science, society, and the rising culture. New York, NY: Bantam.

Capra, F. (1997). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. New York, NY: Anchor.

Curry, A., & Hodgson, A. (2008). Seeing in multiple horizons: connecting futures to strategy. Journal of Futures Studies, 13(1), 1-20.

Irwin, T. (2015). Transition Design: A proposal for a new area of design practice, study, and research. Design and Culture, 72, 229-246.

Kossoff, G., Tonkinwise, C., & Irwin, T. (2015). Transition Design: The importance of everyday life and lifestyles as a leverage point for sustainability transitions. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/15403946/Transition_Design_The_Importance_of_Everyday_Life_and_Lifestyles_as_a_Leverage_Point_for_Sustainability_Transitions_presented_at_the_STRN_Conference_2015_Sussex_

Manzini, E. (2009). A cosmopolitan localism: Prospects for a sustainable local development and the possible role of design. In H. Clark and D. Brody (Eds), Design Studies: A Reader (pp. 448). New York, NY: Berg.

Max-Neef, M. A. (1991). Human scale development conception application and further reflections. New York, NY: Apex Press.

Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage points: Places to intervene in a system. The Sustainability Institute, 3, pp. 78-84.

Phills, Jr., J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved from http://ssir.org/articles/entry/rediscovering_social_innovation

Roland, E. C. (2011). Eight forms of capital. Permaculture, (68), 58-61. Retrieved from http://appleseedpermaculture.com/wpcontent/uploads/2011/04/8_Forms_of_Capital_PM68.pdf

Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 42, 155-169.

School of Design at Carnegie Mellon University. (n.d.). PhD in Transition Design. Retrieved from https://design.cmu.edu/content/phd-transition-design

School of Design at Carnegie Mellon University. (n.d.). Professional Doctorate. Retrieved from https://design.cmu.edu/content/professional-doctorate

Social Design Pathways (2017). Retrieved from http://www.socialdesignpathways.com/how-to-use/

Thomas, T., & Leber, B. (2016). 6 key takeaways from the global service jam. Maya Design Blog. Retrieved from http://maya.com/blog/pittsburgh-service-jam-2016

Wahl, D. (2017, June 7). The three horizons of innovation and culture change. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@designforsustainability/the-three-horizons-of-innovation-andculture-change-d9681b0e0b0f

Woodhouse, M. B. (1996). Paradigm wars: Worldviews for a new age. Berkeley, CA: Frog Books.