Transition Design: Teaching and Learning

  • Stacie Rohrbach
  • Molly Steenson
Palavras-chave: Design para a Transição; educação; currículo; ensino; aprendizagem; teoria; prática

Resumo

Para o desenvolvimento do Design para a Transição, é fundamental sua base na Educação Superior. A base teórica que informa a prática do Design para a Transição se desenvolve a partir de um processo emergente formado por hipóteses, teoria e provas em entornos educativos. Estes enfoques, centrados em abordar desafios específicos, complexos e baseados na localização, devem adaptar-se para abordar a natureza de contextos específicos e a aprendizagem variada das coortes de estudantes e suas respectivas necessidades. Este trabalho argumenta a importância e a integração cuidadosa do Design para a Transição na educação em design, e introduz um programa de estudos para estudantes de design de graduação e doutorado. Descreve os métodos e ferramentas que se utilizam nosso ensino, descreve os êxitos, identifica os desafios, apresenta ideias para melhorar y propõe oportunidades para o desenvolvimento.

Referências

Candy, S. (2010). The futures of everyday life: Politics and the design of experiential scenarios (Doctoral dissertation) University of Hawaii, Manoa.

Capra, F. (1983). The turning point: Science, society, and the rising culture. New York, NY: Bantam.

Capra, F. (1997). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. New York, NY: Anchor.

Curry, A., & Hodgson, A. (2008). Seeing in multiple horizons: connecting futures to strategy. Journal of Futures Studies, 13(1), 1-20.

Irwin, T. (2015). Transition Design: A proposal for a new area of design practice, study, and research. Design and Culture, 72, 229-246.

Kossoff, G., Tonkinwise, C., & Irwin, T. (2015). Transition Design: The importance of everyday life and lifestyles as a leverage point for sustainability transitions. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/15403946/Transition_Design_The_Importance_of_Everyday_Life_and_Lifestyles_as_a_Leverage_Point_for_Sustainability_Transitions_presented_at_the_STRN_Conference_2015_Sussex_

Manzini, E. (2009). A cosmopolitan localism: Prospects for a sustainable local development and the possible role of design. In H. Clark and D. Brody (Eds), Design Studies: A Reader (pp. 448). New York, NY: Berg.

Max-Neef, M. A. (1991). Human scale development conception application and further reflections. New York, NY: Apex Press.

Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage points: Places to intervene in a system. The Sustainability Institute, 3, pp. 78-84.

Phills, Jr., J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved from http://ssir.org/articles/entry/rediscovering_social_innovation

Roland, E. C. (2011). Eight forms of capital. Permaculture, (68), 58-61. Retrieved from http://appleseedpermaculture.com/wpcontent/uploads/2011/04/8_Forms_of_Capital_PM68.pdf

Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 42, 155-169.

School of Design at Carnegie Mellon University. (n.d.). PhD in Transition Design. Retrieved from https://design.cmu.edu/content/phd-transition-design

School of Design at Carnegie Mellon University. (n.d.). Professional Doctorate. Retrieved from https://design.cmu.edu/content/professional-doctorate

Social Design Pathways (2017). Retrieved from http://www.socialdesignpathways.com/how-to-use/

Thomas, T., & Leber, B. (2016). 6 key takeaways from the global service jam. Maya Design Blog. Retrieved from http://maya.com/blog/pittsburgh-service-jam-2016

Wahl, D. (2017, June 7). The three horizons of innovation and culture change. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@designforsustainability/the-three-horizons-of-innovation-andculture-change-d9681b0e0b0f

Woodhouse, M. B. (1996). Paradigm wars: Worldviews for a new age. Berkeley, CA: Frog Books.

Publicado
2019-09-20
Como Citar
Rohrbach, S., & Steenson, M. (2019). Transition Design: Teaching and Learning. Cuadernos Del Centro De Estudios De Diseño Y Comunicación, (73), 235 a 263. https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi73.1047