Defining Design for Sustainability and Conservation Mindsets
Résumé
Our planet is currently facing an unprecedented state of emergency concerning environmental depletion that has brought forth consequences such as biodiversity loss, climate change, and the rise of sea levels. These urgent, global challenges require new paradigms of being, relating to each other, and doing that operate from a foundational level (mental models), through a relational level (social connections, interdisciplinarity), and into a practice level (technical solutions). Design for Conservation1 (D4C) is a methodological toolkit that environmental conservation groups can use to maximize innovation outcomes and ensure effective, sustainable, transformative change. In this paper, we present the rationale behind the mindsets that intend to set foundational attitudes when following a D4C approach. We also discuss the role of empathy, which is a fundamental aspect of the Design Thinking approach and it is also central to the D4C methodology as the main ability for the reconnection stage. Mental models help us simplify complexity, understand why we consider some things more relevant than others, and influence our decisions. In general, contemporary designer mindsets promote openness and a positive attitude through empathy, collaboration, creativity, error-friendliness, iteration, ambiguity, amongst others. While these mindsets have proven to be very useful in a market-led context, they are insufficient when designing for sustainability and environmental conservation purposes. Design for Conservation requires a radical systemic shift that challenges the current notions of value, success, health and wellbeing, that cannot be achieved following market-led mental models. Therefore, we established the following hypothesis: “through the use of bio-inspiration, we can identify general principles that govern people and natural systems alike and use them as a basis for defining mental models.” The result of this analysis led to the definition of 7 interconnected mental models that consider humans as part of a complex ecosystem: Honest, Positive, Humble, Balanced, Relative, Systemic, and Cyclic.
Références
Adams, R. S.; Daly, S. R.; Mann, L. M. & Dall’Alba, G. (2011). Being a professional: Three lenses into design thinking, acting, and being. Design Studies, 32, 588-607.
Badke-Schaub, P. & Cardoso, C. (2010). Design thinking: A paradigm on its way from dilution to meaninglessness? Proceedings of the 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium (DTRS8).
Baxter, W. H. & Sagart, L. (2014). Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-994537-5.
Benyus, J. M. (1997). Biomimicry: innovation inspired by nature. New York: Morrow.
Berger, W. (2009). How design can transform your life, and even maybe the world. New York: The Penguin Press.
Beverland, M. & Farrelly, F. J. (2007). What Does It Mean to Be Design! led Design Management Review, 18, 10-17.
Biomimicry Institute (2018). Nature inspired innovation. Retrieved from www.biomimicry.org on 2 December 2020.
Boland, R. & Collopy, F. (2004). Managing As Designing. Bibliovault OAI Repository, the University of Chicago Press.
Both, T. and Baggereor, D. (2010). Bootcamp bootleg, Design School Stanford, Palo Alto.
Brooks, D. (2011), The Limits of Empathy. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/30/opinion/brooks-the-limits-of-empathy.html
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86, 84-95.
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design, HarperCollins, p. 378.
Brown, T. & Katz, B. (2011). Change by Design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(3), 381–383. 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00806.x
Bloom, P. (2016). Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion, Ecco Press.
Buckminster Fuller, R. (1963). Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth. (New York: E.P. Dutton & Co., 1963)
Burdick, A. & Willis, H. (2011). Digital learning, digital scholarship and design thinking. Design Studies, 32, 546-556.
Buchanan, R. (2009). ‘Wicked Problems in Design Thinking’. In David Brody and Clark (eds.). Design Studies: A Reader. Oxford; New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 5-21.
Cailan, K. (2016). How Slow Knowledge can save us in the Information Age. The difference between information and wisdom. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@kylecalian/how-slow-knowledge-can-save-us-in-the-information-age-c8bf70cab57a#:~:text=So%20here%20is%20a%20list,context%2C%20patterns%2C%20and%20connections on 2 December 2020.
Carlgren, L.; Rauth, I. & Elmquist, M. (2016). Framing Design Thinking: The Concept in Idea and Enactment. Creativity and Innovation Management. 25. 38-57. 10.1111/caim.12153.
Clark, K. & Smith, R. (2010). Unleashing the power of design thinking. In: Lockwood, T. (ed.) Design Thinking : integrating innovation, customer experience, and brand value / edited by Thomas Lockwood. NY: Allworth Press.
Cox, S. G. (2005). Cox Review of Creativity in Business: building on the UK’s strengths. London: HM Treasury.
Craik, K. J. W. (1943). The nature of explanation. University Press, Macmillan.
Cross, N. (2007). ‘From a Design Science to a Design Discipline: Understanding Designerly Ways of Knowing and Thinking’. In Ralf Michel (ed.). Design Research Now: Essays and Selected Projects. Basel: London: Birkhauser ; Springer [distributor], 41-54.
Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies, 32, 521-532.
Duckett, D.; Feliciano, D.; Martin-Ortega, J. & Munoz-Rojas, J. (2016). Tackling wicked environmental problems: The discourse and its influence on praxis in Scotland, Landscape and Urban Planning, Volume 154, Pages 44-56, ISSN 0169-2046.
Dunne, A. and Raby, F., (2013). Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. The MIT Press.
Design Council, “The Design Process: What is the Double Diamond?” (2018).[Online]. vailable: www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/design-process-whatdouble-diamond. [Accessed: 04-Aug-2018]
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. The Nature of Intelligence, 12, 231-235.
Friis Dam, R. and Siang, T. Y., Interaction Design Org. What is Design Thinking and Why Is It So Popular? Retrieved from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/what-is-design-thinking-and-why-is-it-so-popular#:~:text=So%2C%20why%20call%20it%20Design,our%20countries%2C%20in%20our%20lives.|
Goldschmidt, G. & Rodgers, P. A. (2013). The design thinking approaches of three different groups of designers based on self-reports. Design Studies, 34, 454-471.
Greater Good Science Centre (2020), What is Empaty? Retrieved from https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/topic/empathy/definition#:~:text=Emotion%20researchers%20generally%20define%20empathy,might%20be%20thinking%20or%20feeling.
Hassi, L. & Laakso, M. Conceptions of Design Thinking in the design and management discourses. (2011). Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Design Research, IASDR.
IBM. (2018). Ready for a new way to work? Enterprise Design Thinking by IBM. Retrieved from: https://www.ibm.com/design/thinking/
IBM (2018) The Loop Understand the present and envision the future in a continuous cycle of observing, reflecting, and making. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/design/thinking/page/framework/loop
IDEO. User-centered design. Retrieved from http://www.designkit.org/methods
Interaction Design Org. (2020), ‘What is Design Thinking?’, Retrieved from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/design-thinking
Irwin, T.; Kossoff, G.; Tonkinwise, C. and Scupelli, P. (2015). Transition Design Overview. Available at https://www.academia.edu/13122242/Transition_Design_Overview [accessed 24 October 2015].
Jensen, S. (2016). Empahty and Imaginaiton in Education for Sustainability. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education.
Jevnaker, B. H. (2000). How design becomes strategic. Design Management Journal (Former Series), 11, 41-47.
Jones, N. A.; Ross, H.; Lynam, T.; Perez, P. and Leitch, A. (2011). Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society 16(1): 46. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art46/
Jones, N. A.; Ross, H.; Lynam, T. and Perez, P. (2014). Eliciting mental models: a comparison of interview procedures in the context of natural resource management. Ecology and Society 19(1): 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06248-190113
Jung, C. G. (1973). Experimental Researches, Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Volume 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-09764-0. (Routledge: ISBN 978-0-415-08384-3).
Kania, J; Kramer, M, and Senge, P. (2018). The water of systems change. FSG Reimagining Social Change.
Kelley, T. & Kelley, D. (2013). Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential Within Us All, Crown Publishing Group.
Kumbell, L. (2009). Beyond design thinking: Design-as-practice and designs-in-practice. CRESC Conference, Manchester.
Kimbell, L. (2011). “Rethinking Design Thinking.” Design and Culture, 3(3): 285–306
Krznaric, R. (2014). Empathy: a Handbook for Revolution, Random House, London (2014), Google Scholar.
Liedtka, J. & Ogilvie, T. (2011). Designing for Growth: A Design Thinking Tool Kit for Managers, Columbia Univ Press.
Lockwood, T. & Walton, T. (2008). Building Design Strategy: Using Design to Achieve Key Business Objectives. New York, NY: Allworth Press.
Naess, A. (1990). Outline of an Ecosophy. Translated and revised by David Rothenberg. (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989. xiii + 233 pp., figures, notes, bibliography, index).
Mann, Ch. C. and Plummer, M. L. (1996). Noah’s Choice: the Future of Endangered Species. Knopf.
Manzini, E. (1994). Physis and design. Interaction between nature and culture. Temes de disseny; Núm.: 10 Edició català-castellà-anglès.
Manzini, E. and Jégou, F. (2003). Sustainable Everyday. Scenarios of Urban Life. Milan: Edizioni Ambiente.
Martin, R. L. (2010). Design thinking: achieving insights via the “knowledge funnel”. Strategy & Leadership, 38, 37-41.
Mauri, M. (2011). Self-respect and Honesty. Filozofia 66, 2011, No 1, p. 74.
Michlewski, K. (2008). Uncovering design attitude: Inside the culture of designers. Organization Studies, 29, 373-392.
Miller, K. & Moultrie, J. (2013). Understanding the Skills of Design Leaders. Design Management Journal, 8, 35-51
Moldjord, Ch. & Iversen, A. (2015). Developing vulnerability trust in temporary high performance teams. Team Performance Management. 21.10.1108/TPM-08-2014-0050.
Morris, J. & Ruru, J. (2010). Giving Voice to rivers: Legal Personality as a vehicle for recognising indigenous peoples’relationships? Australian Indigenous Law Review, 14(2), 49-62. Retrieved December 21, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/26423181
Pahl, S. & Bauer, J. (2013). Environment and Behavior - journals.sagepub.com
Paton, B. & Dorst, K. (2011). Briefing and reframing: A situated practice. Design Studies, 32, 573-587.
Prinz, J. (2011). Is empathy necessary for morality? In Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives (Coplan, A. and Goldie, P., eds), pp. 211-229, Oxford University Press
Rifkin, J. (2009). The empathic civilization: The race to global consciousness in a world in crisis. Tarcher/Penguin Group.
Rittel, H. W. J. and Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4, 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Sevillano, V.; Aragones, J. & Schultz, P. (2007). Perspective Taking, Environmental Concern, and the Moderating Role of Dispositional Empathy. Environment and Behavior. 39. 685-705. 10.1177/0013916506292334.
Scharmer, O. (2014). From Ego-System to Eco-System Economies. Acumen Social Impact Analysis course reading materials. Retrieved from https://www.plusacumen.org/courses/social-impact-analysis
Schweitzer, J.; Groeger, L. & Sobel, L. (2016). The Design thinking mindset: an assessment of what we know and what we see in practice. Journal of design, business & society, 2(1), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs.2.1.71_1
Schweitzer, J.; Groeger, L. & Sobel, L. (2015). Innovation and design thinking mindsets, Conference: Design for Business: Research Conference At: Melbourne, Australia, Journal of Design Business & Society 2(1)- 10.1386/dbs.2.1.71_1
Shindler, B. & Cramer, L. A. (1999). Shifting public values for forest management: Making sense of wicked problems. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 14, 28-34.
Tonkinwise, C. (2014). Design Studies - What is it Good For?. Design and Culture. 6. 5-43. 10.2752/175470814X13823675225036.
Weizaker, E. & Von, C. (1988). «Come vivere con gli errori. IIvalore evolutivo degli errori», in Ceruti, M. and Laszlo, E., 1998.
Google Ventures, the Design Sprint. Retrieved from https://www.gv.com/sprint/
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista ceden los derechos de autor y de publicación a "Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación", Aceptando el registro de su trabajo bajo una licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que de el crédito pertinente a los autores y a esta revista.
