Volver a las metáforas Darwinianas: la evolución de los artefactos Back to Darwinian metaphors: The evolution of artefacts
Résumé
Evolutionary concepts may have great appeal when studying material culture and its designed objects. As a matter of fact, there is robust tradition in using biological analogies to understand designs, as it occurs in the field of bionics, where the simulation of vital processes advocates not only an approach of a purely cognitive nature but, rather, an operative programme allowing the translation of isomorphisms between living organisms and technology into effective design solutions. More generally, natural sciences offer an uncommonly rich apparatus for analogies to be applied to the domains of the sciences of the artificial. But how widely applicable are Darwinian metaphors? To which extent do the Darwinian concepts of variation and selection provide meaningful theoretical tools across product innovation? What can they add to the analysis of product designs? To this end, this study takes the form of a literature review about evolutionary approaches to the analysis of technological change, along with a number of interpretations about the analogies between natural evolution and the dynamics of product variety generation.
Références
Basalla, G. (1988). The Evolution of Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature. A Necessary Unity. New York: Dutton.
Blackwood, B. (1970). The Classification of Artefacts in the Pitt-Rivers Museum Oxford. Occasional Papers on Technology, II, Oxford: Pitt-Rivers Museum.
Businaro, U. L. (1982). Comparing Natural Evolution and Technological Innovation. Fiat Research Center, Internal report.
Businaro, U. L. (1983). Applying The Biological Evolution Metaphor toTechnological Innovation. Futures, 15 (6), 463-477.
Butler, S. (1863). Darwin among the Machines. The Press, Christchurch New Zealand, 13 June 1863.
Campbell, M., & Whelan, A. (1985). An Evolutionary Theory of Technological Change. Methodology and Science, XVIII (4), 284-291.
Coineau, Y., & Kresling, B. (1987). Les inventions de la nature et la Bionique. Hachette: Paris.
Darwin, C. (1872). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. 6° ed., London: John Murray.
Deforge, Y. (1985). Technologie et génétique de l’objet industriel. Paris: Maloine.
Di Bartolo, C. (1981). Strutture naturali e modelli bionici. Milano: Istituto Europeo di Design.
Di Bernardo, B. & Rullani, E. (1984). Evoluzione: un nuovo paradigma per la teoria dell’impresa e del cambiamento tecnologico. Economia e politica industriale, 42 (1984), 39-106.
Dosi G., & Nelson R. (1994). An Introduction to Evolutionary Theories in Economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 4 (3), 153-172.
Dobzhanski, F. (1970). Genetics of The Evolutionary Process. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ellul, J. (1977). Le système technicien. Paris: Calman-Lévy.
Faber, M., & Proops, J. L. R. (1990). Evolution, Time, Production and the Environment. Heidelberg: Springer.
Faber, M., & Proops, J. L. R. (1991). Evolution in Biology, Physics and Economics: A Conceptual Analysis. In: Saviotti, P. P. and Metcalfe, S. J. (Eds). Evolutionary Theories of Economic and Technological Change (pp. 58-87). Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Franz, V. (1951). Zum jetzigen Stand der Theorie von biotechnischen Fortschritt in der Pflanzen und Tiergeschichte. Biologia Generalis, 19 (3), 368-386.
Gallino, L. (1987). L’attore sociale. Biologia, cultura e intelligenza artificiale. Torino: Einaudi.
Gould, S. J. (1980). The Panda’s Thumb. New York: Norton & Company.
Gould, S. J. (1991). Bully for Brontosaurus. Reflections in Natural History. New York and London: Norton & Company.
Grassé, P. P. (1973). L’évolution du vivant. Matériaux pour une nouvelle théorie transformiste. Paris: Albin Michel.
Grassman, P. (1985). Lässt sich die technische Entwicklung mit der biologischen Evolution vergleichen? Naturwissenschaften, 72, 567- 573.
Hertel, H. (1963). Struktur-Form-Bewegung. Biologie und Technik, Mainz: Kransskopf-Verlag.
Hirshleifer, J. (1977). Economics from a biological viewpoint. Journal of Law and Economics, 20 (1), 1-52.
Hottois, G. (1984). Le signe et la technique. La Philosophie à l’epreuve de la technique. Paris: Aubier Montaigne.
Huxley, J. (1963). Evolution. The Modern Synthesis. London: Allen and Unwin.
Kresling, B. (1995). Plant ‘Design’: Mechanical Simulations of Growth Patterns and Bionics. Biomimetics, 3, 105-120.
Kresling, B. (2012). Origami-structures in nature: lessons in designing “smart” materials. MRS Online Proceedings Library, 1420, 42-54.
Lane-Fox Pitt-Rivers, A. H. (1906). The Evolution of Culture and Other Essays. Oxford: J. L. Myres.
Laszlo, E. (1985). Evolution. The Club of Rome Information Series, no. 3 – Contributions to the understanding of the World Problématique.
Laszlo, E. (1986). Evoluzione. Milano: Feltrinelli.
Laszlo, E. (1988). L’evoluzione della complessità e l’ordine mondiale contemporaneo. In: Bocchi, G. & Ceruti, M. (a cura di), La sfida della complessità (pp. 362-400). Milano: Feltrinelli.
Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1964). Le geste et la parole. Technique et language. Paris: Albin Michel.
Lewontin, R. C. (1977). Adattamento. In: Enciclopedia Einaudi, vol. I (pp. 198-214). Torino: Einaudi.
Lewontin, R. C. (1983). The Organism as the Subject and Object of Evolution. Scientia, Annus LXXVII, 118, I-VII.
Lewontin, R. C., & Levins, R. (1978). Evoluzione. In: Enciclopedia Einaudi, vol. V (pp. 995- 1051). Torino: Einaudi.
Luhman, N. (1986). Okologische Kommunikation. Kann die moderne Gesellschaft sich auf okologische Gefahrdungen einstellen? Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Maldonado, T. (1998). Ancora la tecnica. Un “tour d’horizon”. In: Nacci, M. (a cura di), Oggetti d’uso quotidiano (pp. 199-227). Venezia: Marsilio.
Moles, A. (1969). Objet et communication. Les Objets. Communications, 13, Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Monod, J. (1970). Le hazard et la necessité. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Mokyr, J. (1991). Evolutionary Biology, Technological Change and Economic History. Bulletin of Economic Research, 43 (2), 127-149.
Mokyr, J. (1996). Evolution and technological change: a new metaphor for economic history. In: Fox, R. (Ed.) (1996). Technological Change. London: Harwood Publishers.
Mokyr, J. (1998). Neither Chance nor Necessity: Evolutionary Models and Economic History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nachtigall, W., & Kresling, B. (1992). Bauformen der Natur, Teil I: Tecnische Biologic und Bionik von Kno-ten-Stab-Tragerwerken. Naturwissenschaften, 5 (79), 193-201.
Nachtigall, W., & Kresling, B. (1992a). Bauformen der Natur, Teil II: Tecnische Biologic und Bionik von Platte-und Faltkonstruktionen. Naturwissenschaften, 6 (92), 251-259.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1974). Neo-classical vs. evolutionary theories of economic growth: critique and prospectus. Economic Journal, 84 (336), 886-905.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1977). In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation. Research Policy, 6 (1), 36-76.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Odum, E. P. (1953). Fundamentals of ecology. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Pantzar, M. (1991). A Replicative Perspective on Evolutionary Dynamics. The Organising Process of the US Economy Elaborated through Biological Metaphor. Helsinki: Labour Institute for Economic Research, Research Report 37.
Pantzar, M. (1992). The growth of product variety: a myth? Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 16 (4), 345-362.
Pantzar, M. (2010). Do commodities reproduce themselves through human beings? Toward an ecology of goods. World Futures, 38 (4), 201-224.
Pearce, P. (1978). Structure in Nature is a Strategy for Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Penrose, E. T. (1952). Biological analogies in the theory of the firm. American Economic Review, 42 (5), 804-819.
Petroski, H. (1994). The Evolution of Useful Things. How Everyday Artifacts – from Forks and Pins to Paper Clips and Zippers – Came to be as They Are. New York: Vintage Books.
Pizzocaro S. (1994). Una metàfora darwiniana. Objectes, sistemes articials i mutacions tecnològiques en una perspectiva evolutiva. Temes de Disseny, 10, 53-92.
Pizzocaro, S. (2020). La ricerca guarda alla natura: analogie, modelli, confronti. In: Arruda, A. (a cura di). Bionica e design (pp. 206-214). São Paolo: Blücher.
Robinette, J. C. (ed.) (1961). Bionics Symposium: Living protypes-the key to new technology. Wadd Technical Report 60-600. Dayton, OH: Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, Directorate of Advanced Systems Technology, Wright Air Development Division, Air Research and Development Command, U.S. Air Force.
Saviotti, P. P., & Metcalfe, S. J. (Eds). (1991). Evolutionary Theories of Economic and Techological Change. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Simondon, G. (1969). Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Paris: Aubier Montaigne.
Simon, H. A. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
Steadman, P. (1979). The Evolution of Designs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Urbanek, A. (1988). Morpho-Physiological Progress. In: Nitecki, M. E. (Ed.). Evolutionary Progress (pp. 195-216). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Van Valen, L. (1973). A New Evolutionary Law. Evolutionary Theory, 1, 1-30.
Whyte, J. (2007). Evolutionary Theories and Design Practices. Design Issues, 23(2), 46-54.
Winter, S. G. (1964). Economic Natural Selection and The Theory of The Firm. Yale Economic Essays, 4 (1964), 225-272.
Yeang, K. (1974). Bionics: the use of biological analogies for design. Architectural Association Quarterly, VI (2), 48-57.
Ziman, J. M. (Ed.) (2000). Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista ceden los derechos de autor y de publicación a "Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación", Aceptando el registro de su trabajo bajo una licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que de el crédito pertinente a los autores y a esta revista.
