Creativity: resource or risk?

  • María Aranguren Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina
Keywords: Creativity, Psychopathology, Psychological Wellbeing,

Abstract

The main objective of this work is to review some of the present perspectives and outstanding contributions that examine the relationship between creativity, psychopathology and psychological well-being. We know that creativity is a psychological process, which involves and integrates cognitive, volitional and emotional aspects of human behavior. In addition, creativity is associated with a greater flow of ideas, cognitive flexibility, ability to solve problems and originality (Guilford, 1956, 1968; Torrance, 1966), all qualities that lead to think of a better quality of life. Many of the humanist psychologists and others from the psychoanalytic stream stress that creativity is an element linked to sublimation, play, symbolic thought, transcendence and self-realization (Maslow, Rogers, Winnicott, Frankl, Freud, among others). However, many empirical studies show that highly creative individuals are more vulnerable to mental disorders, especially in the spectrum of mood disorders. Some current studies attempt to clarify the issue of creativity and psychopathology, taking into account different perspectives, which may explain the possible links between these two conceptual entities. The perspectives or contributions, which are considered in the present article to address this problem, are: (a) the historical-social perspective, (b) the contributions of psychometric studies and cognitive psychology, in relation to personality traits and cognitive styles, (c) the “systemic” perspective or contributions from fractal geometry, and (d) the contributions from positive psychology. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Artola, T., Ancillo, I., Mosteiro, P. y Barraca, J. (2004). PIC. Prueba de Imaginación Creativa. Madrid: TEA, Ediciones.

Becker, G. (2000-2001). The association of creativity and psychopathology: its cultural-historical origins. Creativity Research Journal, 13(1), 45-53.

Camacho, J. M. (2005) El humor y la dimensión creativa en psicoterapia. Psicodebate. Psicología, cultura y sociedad, 5(1), 45-58. Facultad de humanidades y ciencias sociales. Universidad de Palermo.

Carr, A. (2007). Psicología positiva. La ciencia de la felicidad. (G. Sánchez Barberán Tr.). Barcelona: Paidós. (Trabajo original publicado en 2004).

Claridge, G. (1972). The schizophrenias as nervous types. British Journal of Psychiatry, 121, 1-17.

Contini de González, N. (2000) La creatividad como recurso de afrontamiento en la vida cotidiana. Psicodebate. Psicología, Cultura y Sociedad, 1(1), 19-25. Facultad de humanidades y ciencias sociales. Universidad de Palermo.

Corbalán Berná, F. J., Martínez Zaragoza, F., Donolo, D. S., Alonso Monreal, C., Tejerina Arreal, M. y LImiñana Gras, R. M. (2003). Inteligencia creativa. CREA, Manual. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Fluir. Una psicología de la felicidad. (N. López Tr.). Buenos Aires: Kairos. (Trabajo original publicado en 1990)

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Creatividad. El fluir y la psicología del descubrimiento y la invención (J. P. Tosaus Abadía Tr.). Buenos Aires: Paidós. (Trabajo original publicado en 1996)

Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 147-178.

Eysenck, H. J. (1994). Creativity and personality: word association, origins and psychoticism. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 209-216.

Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: the natural history of creativity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Franco Justo, C. (2004). Aplicación de programa psicoeducativo para fomentar la creatividad en la etapa de educación infantil. Relieve, 10 (2), 245-266.

Garaigordobil, M. y Pérez, J. I. (2005). Escala de personalidad creadora: estudio psicométrico exploratorio. Estudios de Psicología, 26(3), 345-364.

Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of the intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267-293. Guilford, J. P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity and their educational implications. San Diego, California: Robert R. Knapp.

Judge, T.A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E. y Thoresen, C.J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 693-710.

Ludwig, A. M. (1992) Creative achievement and psychopathology: Comparisons among professions. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 46, 330-356.

Ludwig, A. M. (1995). The price of greatness: resolving the creativity and madness controversy. New York: Guilford.

Ludwig, A. M. (1998). Method and madness in the arts and sciences. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 93-101.

Mandelbrot, B. (1988). Fractal geometry of nature. New York: W. H. Freeman. Martinez, C. (S.f.). Creatividad: recurso o insumo?... vital. Extraído el 3 de junio de 2009 desde: http://www.suicidologia.org.ar/textos.php.

Marietán, H. R. (1996). Curso de semiología psiquiátrica: funciones básicas. Buenos Aires: Ananké.

McConaghy, N. (1960). Modes of abstract thinking and psychosis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 106-110.

McConaghy, N. (1961). The measurement of an inhibitory process in human higher nervous activity: Its relation to allusive thinking and fatigue. American Journal of Psychiatry, 118, 125-132.

McConaghy, N. & Clancy, M. (1968). Familial relationship of allusive thinking in university students and their parents. British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 1079-1087.

Ornstein, R. (1997). The right mind. New York: Harcourt Brance.

Peterson, J. B. & Carson, S. (2002). Latent inhibition and openness to experience in a high-achieving student population. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 323 -332.

Peterson, J. B., Smith, K. W. & Carson, S. (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: replication and commentary. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(7), 1137-1147.

Prenda, K. M. y Lachman, M. E. (2001). Planing for the future: a life Management strategy for increasing control and life satisfaction in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 16, 206-216.

Prentky, R. A. (2000-2001). Mental illness and roots of genius. Creativity Research Journal, 13(1), 95-104.

Rey, F. G. y Martinez, A. M. (1989) La personalidad: su educación y desarrollo. Cuba: Editorial Pueblo y Educación.

Simonton, D. K. (S.f.) Creativity and psychopathology. Contemporary answers to an ancient question. Obtenido 31 de mayo de 2009 en: http:// psychology.ucdavis.edu/simonton/samplepaper175.pdf

Simonton, D. K. (2005) Are genius and madness related? Psychiatric Times, 22 (7). Obtenido 16 de junio de 2009 en: http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/display/ article/10168/52456?pageNumber=3

Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

Sternberg, R. J. y Lubart, T. I. (1997). La creatividad en una cultura conformista. Un desafío a las masas. (Ferran Meler Tr.). Barcelona: Editorial Paidós. (Trabajo original publicado en 1995).

Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Norms and technical manual. Lexington: M. A. Personnel Press.

Wasylkiew, L. y Fekken, C. G. (2002). Personality and self-reported health: Matching predictors and criteria. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 607-620.

Weschsler, S. M. (1999). Avaliação multidimensional da criatividade: uma realiadade necessária. Extraído el 22 de mayo de 2009 desde: http:// www.potencializar.com.br/Publicacoes.htm.

Weschsler, S. M. (2006). Estilos de pensar y criar: impacto nas areas educacional y professional. Psicodebate. Psicología, cultura y sociedad, 7, 207-218. Facultad de humanidades y ciencias sociales. Universidad de Palermo.

Weschsler, S. M. y Nakano, T. C. (2002). Caminhos para a avaliação da criatividade: perspectiva brasileira. Em R. Primi (org.). Temas em Avaliação Psicológica. Campinas: IDB (pp. 103- 115).

Wikipedia. Enciclopedia de contenido libre mantenida por la Fundación Wikipedia sin fines de lucro. (http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: Portada).

Published
2010-12-01
How to Cite
Aranguren, M. (2010). Creativity: resource or risk?. Psicodebate, 10, 191-212. https://doi.org/10.18682/pd.v10i0.396