Character strengths and virtues
Abstract
The target of this work is to carry out a critical analysis about some of the underlying epistemological assumptions in Peterson and Seligman’s book Character Strengths and Virtues. A handbook and classifications (2004). This is a theoretical investigation that belongs to the epistemology of psychology field. According to the theory proposed by Serroni Copello (2003), a critic progress rational criterion is methodologically applied. The analysis points out some epistemological weakness that leads to incongruences in the statements and conclusions of the investigations, such as: the absence of a unified theory, a candid search of objectivity, and the superposition of implicit paradigms. It also takes notice of a causal and elementary logic -which goes against today’s scientific paradigm-, and the strong American culture zeitgeist present in the principles of Positive Psychology. Finally, some ethic problems are displayed, in particular the step taken from a descriptive attitude –characteristic of science- toward a prescriptive attitude –characteristic of moral codes-.
Downloads
References
Aspinwall, L.G. & Staudinger, U. M. (2002) A psychology of human strengths: Some central issues of an emerging field. In A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Blanco A. & Díaz D. (2004) Bienestar social y trauma psicosocial: una visión alternativa al trastorno de estrés postraumático. Clínica y Salud. 15 (3), Pp. 227-252
Casullo, M. M. (2005) El capital psíquico. Aportes de la Psicología Positiva. Psicodebate 6. 59-71. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Palermo
Cuadra, H. & Florenzano, R. (2003) El Bienestar Subjetivo: Hacia una Psicología Positiva. Revista de Psicología de la Universidad de Chile, Vol. XII, 1, 83-96.
Held, B. (2002). The tyranny of the positive attitude in America: observation and speculation. Journal of clinical psychology . 58, 965-992.
Held, B. (2004) The negative side of positive psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 44, 9-46
Katzko, M. W. (2002). The rhetoric of psychological research and the problem of unification in psychology. American psychologist, 57, 262-270.
Kuhn, T. (1962) . The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University Press.
Maslow, A. (1954/1963) Motivación y personalidad. Barcelona: Sagitario.
Millon, T. (1998) Trastornos de la personalidad. Más allá del DSM IV. Barcelona: Masson.
Peterson, Ch. & Seligman, M. (2004) Character Strengths and Virtues. A handbook and classification. New York: APA , Oxford University Press.
Popper, K. (1934/1980). La lógica de la investigación científica. Madrid: Tecnos Reber, A. S. (1995). Dictionary of Psychology. London: Penguin Books.
Rogers, C. (1961/1993) El proceso de convertirse en persona. México: Paidós.
Seligman, M. (2000) Positive Psychology, Positive Prevention, and Positive Therapy. Chapter prepared for Snyder & Lopez: Handbook of positive Psychology. [En red] Disponible en: www.positivepsychology.org/ppsnyderchapter.htm. Recuperado 31-5-05.
Seligman, M. E. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive Psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.
Seligman, M. & Peterson, Ch. (2000) Positive Clinical Psychology. Chapter prepared for Aspinwall & Staudinger: A psychology of human strengths: Perspectives on an emerging field. Washington: APA [En red] Disponible en: www.positivepsychology.org/ documentsandsettings.htm Recuperado 3-6-05.
Serroni Copello, R. (2003). La evolución abstracta de la psicología contemporánea. Ateneos Psicoclínicos: Tributo a Karl Popper. Vol XXIII- 3, 11-21
Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden two. New York: Macmillan.
Taylor, E. (2001) Positive psychology and humanistic psychology: A reply to Seligman. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 41, 13-29
Wainstein, M. (1999). Comunicación: un paradigma de la mente. Buenos Aires: Eudeba (2 edición).
Authors who publish with this journal agree to grant Psicodebate copyright and right of publication and accept the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authors and Psicodebate.
