Intelligence Assessment. Current Tendencies and Some Questions

  • Renata Frank de Verthelyi Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Keywords: Intelligence, Cognitive tests, Multicultural assessment, Cinical integration,

Abstract

The past 50 years have produced multiple advances, as well as strong controversies, regarding the structure, nature, and basic traits of the concept of intelligence. They also originated a number of new cognitive tests based on these theories. In a very competitive market, that tries to go global, two dissimilar tendencies can be presently observed: traditional tests are updated and made more comprehensive, vs. emphasis is placed on cross battery sub-test integration. Similarly, in response to the increasing demand for multicultural assessments, two tendencies predominate: the translation and adaptation of existing tests, vs. the creation of new non- verbal instruments. Some suggestions on how to integrate these varios contributions into the clinical practice are included. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berliner, D.C. & Calfee, R.C. (Eds) (1996). Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Simon y Shuster.

Bracken, B.A. y McCallum, R.S. (1998). Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test. Itasca: Riverside Publishing. Brody, N. (1997). Intelligence, schooling, and society. American Psychologist, 52 (10), 1046-1050.

Casullo, M.M. (1999). La evaluación psicológica: modelos, técnicas y contexto sociocultural. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación Psicológica, 1, 97-113.

Daniel, M.H. (1997). Intelligence testing: status and trends. American Psychologist, 52 (10), 1038-1045. Evans, R.B. (1999). So, what will the next century bring? Monitor APA,30 (12), 29.

Fernandez-Ballesteros, R. (1996). Evaluación en psicología de la salud: algunos problems metodológicos. En M.M. Casullo (Comp.) Evaluación psicológica en el campo de la salud. Barcelona: Paidos.

Flannagan, M.D., Genshaft, J.L., y Harrison, P.L. (Eds) (1997). Contemporary Intellectual Assessment. Theories, tests, and issues. New York: Guilford Press.

Flynn, J.R. (1984). The mean IQ of Americans: massive gains 1932-1978. Psychological Bulletin,95, 29-51. Flynn, J.R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: what IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin,101, 171-191.

Greenfield, P. (1998). The cultural evolution of IQ. En U.Niesser (Ed). The raising curve. Long-term gains in IQ and related measures. Washington,DC: American Psychological Association.

Gregory, R.J. (1999). Foundations of Intelectual Assessment. The WAIS-III and other tests in clinical practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Herrnstein, R.J. y Murray, C. (1994). The Bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.

Kaufman A.S. (1994). Intelligent Testing with the WISC-III. New York: J. Wiley y Sons.

Kaufman, A.S. y Lichtenberger, E.O. (1999). Essentials of the WAIS-III assessment. New York: J. Wiley and Sons.

McGrew, K.S. y Flannagan, D.P. (1998). The intelligence test desk reference (ITDR). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Mercado, B. (1999). La renovación de un clásico: el WISC-III y sus nuevas alternativas de interpretación. En R.F. Verthelyi (Comp.). Nuevos temas en evaluación psicólogica. Buenos Aires: Ed. Lugar.

Miller, J.G. (1997). A cultural psychology perspective on intelligence. En R.J. Sternberg & E. Grigorenko (Eds). Intelligence, heredity and environment. Boston: Cambridge University Press.

Muñoz-Sandoval, A, Cummins, J., Alvarado G.G. & Ruef, M.L. (1998). Bilingual Verbal Ability Tests. Itasca: Riverside Publishing.

Naglieri, J.A. y Bardos, A.N. (1997). General Ability Measure for Adults. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems, Inc.

Neisser, U. (1998). The rising curve. Long-term gains in IQ and related measures. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Neisser, U. (Chair), Bodoo, G., Bouchard Jr., T.J., Bykin, A.W., Brody, N., Ceci, S.J., Halpern, D.F., Loehlin, J.C. Perloff, R., Sternberg, R.J. y Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51 (2), 77-101.

Padilla, A,M. & Medina,A. (1996). Crosscultural sensitivity in assessment: using tests in culturally appropriate ways. En L.A. Zuzuki, P.J. Meller y J.G. Ponterrotto (Eds). Handbook of multicultural assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Rodgers, J.L. (1999). A critique of the Flynn effect: massive IQ gains, methodological artifacts, or both? Intelligence, 26 (4), 337-356.

Scarr,S. (1989) Protecting general intelligence: constructs and consequences for intervention. En R. L.Linn (Eds). Intelligence: measurement, theory, and public policy. Urbana: University Press.

Sternberg, R.J. (1992). CAT: A program of comprehensive abilities testing. En Guifford, B. & O’Connor, M.C. (Eds). Changing Assessments. Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Sternberg, R.J. (1999). Intelligence as developing expertise. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 359-375

Verthelyi, R.F. (1999). La evaluación multicultural: adecuación de los instrumentos y formación del psicólogo. En R.F. Verthelyi (Comp). Nuevos temas en evaluación psicológica. Buenos Aires: Lugar Editorial.

Verthelyi, R.F. (1999). El impacto de la computadora en la evaluación. En R.F. Verthelyi (Comp). Nuevos temas en evaluación psicológica. Buenos Aires: Lugar Editorial.

Wechsler, D. (1991). Manual for the Wechsler scale for children (WISC-III). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation. (Versión en español Test de Inteligencia para niños (WISC-III). Manual. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 1994).

Wechsler, D. (1997). WAIS-III Administration and scoring manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation. (Versión en español. WAIS-III Manual para la administración y puntuación. Madrid: TEA.)

Woodcock, R.W. y Muñoz-Sandoval, A. (1996). Batería Woodcock-Muñoz: Pruebas de Aprovechamiento Revisada, Supplemental Manual. Itasca: Riverside Publishing.

Woodcock, R.W. y Muñoz-Sandoval, A. (1996). Batería Woodcock Muñoz Revisada, Itasca: Riverside Publishing.

Published
2001-12-01
How to Cite
Frank de Verthelyi, R. (2001). Intelligence Assessment. Current Tendencies and Some Questions. Psicodebate, 1, 107-116. https://doi.org/10.18682/pd.v1i0.527