Design’s (Dis)orders: Mediating Systems-Level Transition Design

  • Cameron Tonkinwise
Keywords: orders of design; systems desig; massive change; design at scale

Abstract

Transition Design requires a different kind of designer, one who is not subject to the same kinds of motivations and satisfiers that have ruled design for the last century. This chapter articulates the psychology of Transition Designers as they strive for systemslevel rapid change. As a result, the crux of Transition Design emerges as a practice of materially mediating structural change over time through networked collaborations. The cure for the modernist designer’s megalomania and perfectionism lies in learning to “stay with the trouble”.

References

Andrews, T. (2009). Design and consume to utopia: Where industrial design went wrong. Design Philosophy Papers, 7(2), 71-86.

Bauman, Z. (2013). Liquid modernity. New York, NY: Wiley.

Buchanan, R. (1985). Declaration by design: Rhetoric, argument, and demonstration in design practice. Design Issues, 3(1), 4-22.

Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5-21.

Buchanan, R. (1998). Branzi’s dilemma: Design in contemporary culture. Design Issues, 14(1), 3-20.

Buchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3-23.

Chia, R. C., & Holt, R. (2009). Strategy without design: The silent efficacy of indirect action. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Conklin, J. (2006). Dialogue mapping. Building shared understanding of wicked problems. West Sussex, England: Wiley.

Cooper, A. (2004). The inmates are running the asylum: Why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. Indianapolis, IN: Sams.

Dunne, J. (1997). Back to the rough ground: Practical judgment and the lure of technique. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Findeli, A. (2001). Rethinking design education for the 21st century: Theoretical, methodological, and ethical discussion. Design Issues, 17(1), 5-17.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Golsby-Smith, T. (1996). Fourth order design: A practical perspective. Design Issues, 12(1), 5-25.

Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Irwin, T. (2015). Transition Design: A proposal for a new area of design practice, study, and research. Design and Culture, 7(2), 229-246.

Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1), 36-41.

Loewy, R. (2002). Never leave well enough alone (Paperback ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Polanyi, M. (2009). The tacit dimension (Rev. ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Pye, D. (1968). The nature and art of workmanship. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Thackara, J. (Ed.). (1988). Design after modernism: Beyond the object. New York, NY: Thames and Hudson.

Tonkinwise, C. (2012). Weeding the city of unsustainable cooling, or, many designs not massive design. In L. Tilder & L. Blotstein (Eds.). Design ecologies: Essays on the nature of design (pp. 26-39). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

Tonkinwise, C. (2015). Radical sustainable innovation. In P. Stebbing & U. Tischner, (Eds.), Changing paradigms: designing for a sustainable future (pp. 284-295). Aalto, FL: Cumulus Think Tank

Tonkinwise, C. (2015). Prototyping risks when design is disappearing. Current Issue 06: Designing Wisdom. http://current.ecuad.ca/prototyping-risks-when-design-is-disappearing

Tonkinwise, C. (2016). Failing to sense the future: From design to the proactionary test drive. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 83(3), 597-624.

Tonkinwise, C. (2017). The practically living weight of convenient things. In L. Atzmon & P. Boradkar (Eds.), Encountering things: Design and theories of things. London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.

Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Winograd, T. (1996). Bringing design to software. New York: ACM Press.

Published
2019-09-20
How to Cite
Tonkinwise, C. (2019). Design’s (Dis)orders: Mediating Systems-Level Transition Design. Cuadernos Del Centro De Estudios De Diseño Y Comunicación, (73), 85 a 96. https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi73.1039