Design’s (Dis)orders: Mediating Systems-Level Transition Design
Resumen
El Diseño para la Transición requiere un tipo diferente de diseñador, uno que no esté sujeto a los mismos tipos de motivaciones y satisfactores que han regido al diseño durante el último siglo. Este capítulo articula la psicología de los Diseñadores para la Transición mientras luchan por un cambio rápido a nivel de sistema. Como resultado, el quid del Diseño para la Transición emerge como una práctica de mediación material en el cambio estructural a través del tiempo y de colaboraciones en red. La cura para la megalomanía y el perfeccionismo del diseñador modernista radica en aprender a “lidiar con el problema”.
Citas
Andrews, T. (2009). Design and consume to utopia: Where industrial design went wrong. Design Philosophy Papers, 7(2), 71-86.
Bauman, Z. (2013). Liquid modernity. New York, NY: Wiley.
Buchanan, R. (1985). Declaration by design: Rhetoric, argument, and demonstration in design practice. Design Issues, 3(1), 4-22.
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5-21.
Buchanan, R. (1998). Branzi’s dilemma: Design in contemporary culture. Design Issues, 14(1), 3-20.
Buchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3-23.
Chia, R. C., & Holt, R. (2009). Strategy without design: The silent efficacy of indirect action. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Conklin, J. (2006). Dialogue mapping. Building shared understanding of wicked problems. West Sussex, England: Wiley.
Cooper, A. (2004). The inmates are running the asylum: Why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. Indianapolis, IN: Sams.
Dunne, J. (1997). Back to the rough ground: Practical judgment and the lure of technique. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Findeli, A. (2001). Rethinking design education for the 21st century: Theoretical, methodological, and ethical discussion. Design Issues, 17(1), 5-17.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Golsby-Smith, T. (1996). Fourth order design: A practical perspective. Design Issues, 12(1), 5-25.
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Irwin, T. (2015). Transition Design: A proposal for a new area of design practice, study, and research. Design and Culture, 7(2), 229-246.
Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1), 36-41.
Loewy, R. (2002). Never leave well enough alone (Paperback ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Polanyi, M. (2009). The tacit dimension (Rev. ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Pye, D. (1968). The nature and art of workmanship. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thackara, J. (Ed.). (1988). Design after modernism: Beyond the object. New York, NY: Thames and Hudson.
Tonkinwise, C. (2012). Weeding the city of unsustainable cooling, or, many designs not massive design. In L. Tilder & L. Blotstein (Eds.). Design ecologies: Essays on the nature of design (pp. 26-39). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Tonkinwise, C. (2015). Radical sustainable innovation. In P. Stebbing & U. Tischner, (Eds.), Changing paradigms: designing for a sustainable future (pp. 284-295). Aalto, FL: Cumulus Think Tank
Tonkinwise, C. (2015). Prototyping risks when design is disappearing. Current Issue 06: Designing Wisdom. http://current.ecuad.ca/prototyping-risks-when-design-is-disappearing
Tonkinwise, C. (2016). Failing to sense the future: From design to the proactionary test drive. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 83(3), 597-624.
Tonkinwise, C. (2017). The practically living weight of convenient things. In L. Atzmon & P. Boradkar (Eds.), Encountering things: Design and theories of things. London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.
Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Winograd, T. (1996). Bringing design to software. New York: ACM Press.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista ceden los derechos de autor y de publicación a "Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación", Aceptando el registro de su trabajo bajo una licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que de el crédito pertinente a los autores y a esta revista.
