Gestos y habla en la construcción infantil de narrativas entre pares

  • Florencia Alam
  • Celia Renata Rosemberg
  • Nora Scheuer
Keywords: narratives ; gestures ; interactions ; children ; multimodality

Abstract

The present work aims to analyze the construction of oral narratives by young children in different situations of production, individually or with one or two peers. The work analyzes the structural organization of the stories and the use of gestures to adopt a point of view when narrating: as an external observer or as one of the characters in the narrative. The corpus includes 36 narratives produced by 12 children of 5 years old who live in urban marginalized neighborhoods of the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Each child produced 3 narratives: individually, in dyads and in triads. The children used different sets of thematically related toys. The researcher gave them a set and asked them to narrate using the toys, then removed the toys and asked them to retell the story without the toys. The exchanges were video filmed and then transcribed and categorized using the ELAN program. The verbal information of narratives without the toys was categorized according to the narrative categories of Stein and Glenn (1979) and the gestures were categorized according to the point of view adopted by the child when narrating, considering the categories of previous works (McNeill, 1992; Parrill, 2012). The results showed that both the verbal information selected by the child when narrating and the interaction with other children had an effect on their use of gestures. These results seem to indicate that the use of gestures as a narrative resource depends both on social factors and discursivecognitive factors.

References

Alibali, M.W., y Nathan, M. (2007). Teachers´ gestures as a means of scaffolding students´ understanding: Evidence from an early algebra lesson. En: R.Goldman, R.Pea, B.Barron y S.J. Derry (Eds.), Video Research in the Learning Sciences,, (pp. 349-365). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Arrúe, J. Los contextos de crianza de niños pequeños de entornos socioculturales diversos. Un estudio de las actividades, los conocimientos y las interacciones que configuran los contextos en los hogares. Tesis de doctorado no publicada. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires.

Alam, F. (2015). La construcción interaccional de narrativas de ficción entre niños de distintas edades: Un estudio con niños de poblaciones urbano marginadas. Interdisciplinaria, 32(1), 31-49.

Alam, F. y Rosemberg, C.R. (2016). “¡Uy, no! ¡Mirá lo que pasó!” El uso de recursos evaluativos en narrativas de ficción por niños pequeños de poblaciones urbano-marginadas, Revista Ikala, 21(3), 281-297.

Bavelas, J.B., Chovil, N., Coates, L. y Roe, L. (1995). Gestures Specialized for Dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 394-405.

Brugman, H. y Russel, A. (2004). Annotating Multimedia/ Multi-modal resources with ELAN. En: Proceedings of LREC 2004, Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.

Bruner, J. (1988). Realidad mental y mundos posibles. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Dancygier, B., y Sweetser, E. (Eds.). (2012). Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Demir, Ö. E., Levine, S. C., y Goldin-Meadow, S. (2015). A tale of two hands: children’s early gesture use in narrative production predicts later narrative structure in speech. Journal of child language, 42(3), 662-681.

Ditman, T., Brunyé, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., y Taylor, H. A. (2010). Simulating an enactment effect: Pronouns guide action simulation during narrative comprehension. Cognition, 115(1), 172-178.

Donald, M. (1993). Précis of Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 15, 737-791.

ELAN (Version 5.2) [Computer software]. (2018, April 04). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Retrieved from https://tla.mpi.nl/tools/tla-tools/elan/Goldin-Meadow, S. (1999). The role of gesture in communication and thinking. Trends in cognitive sciences, 3(11), 419-429.

Holler, J., y Stevens, R. (2007). The effect of common ground on how speakers use gesture and speech to represent size information. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(1), 4-27.

Hostetter, A. B., y Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic bulletin review, 15(3), 495-514.

Hostetter, A. B., Alibali, M. W., y Schrager, S. M. (2011). If you don’t already know, I’m certainly not going to show you. En: Stam, G., y Ishino, M. (Eds) (2011). Integrating gestures: The interdisciplinary nature of gesture. (pp. 61-74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company

Hunt, K. W. (1970). Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. Monographs of the society for research in child development, 35(1), iii-67.

Ilgaz, H. y Aksu-Koç, A. (2005). Episodic development in preschool children’s play-prompted and direct-elicited narratives. Cognitive Development, 20(4), 526-544.

Jacobs, N., y Garnham, A. (2007). The role of conversational hand gestures in a narrative task. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(2), 291-303.

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge University Press.

Kita, S. y Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and language, 48(1), 16-32.

Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. En: D.McNeill (Ed.). Language and gesture. (pp. 162-185). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Krauss, C., y Chen, J. Gottesman (2000) Lexical Gestures and Lexical Access: A Process Model. En: D.McNeill (Ed.). Language and gesture. (pp. 261-283). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Nueva York: Routledge

Küntay, A. C. (2009). Microgenesis of narrative competence during preeschool interactions: Effects of the relational context during preschool interactions. En: Aksu Koc / Bekman (Eds.) Perspectives on Human Development, Family, and Culture, Cambridge. (pp. 178-193). UK: Cambridge University Press.

Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

McNeill, D. (1981). Action, thought and language, Cognition, 10, 201-208.

McNeill, D. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological review, 92(3), 350-371.

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Nelson, K. (1996). Language in cognitive development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nelson, K. (2007). Young Minds in Social Worlds. Experience, meaning and memory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Nicolopoulou, A. y Richner, E.S. (2004). “When your powers combine, I am Captain Planet”: The developmental significance of individual- and group-authored stories by preschoolers. Discourse Studies, 6, 347-371.

Parrill, F. (2010). Viewpoint in speech–gesture integration: Linguistic structure, discourse structure, and event structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(5), 650-668.

Parrill, F. (2012). Interactions between discourse status and viewpoint in co-speech gesture. En: Dancygier, B., y Sweetser, E. (Eds.). Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. (pp. 97-112). Cambridge University Press.

Parrill, F., Bullen, J., y Hoburg, H. (2010). Effects of input modality on speech–gesture integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(11), 3130-3137.

Rogoff, B. (1993). Aprendices del pensamiento. Barcelona: Paidós.

Rosemberg, C. R., Stein, A., y Alam, F. (2013). At home and at school: Bridging literacy for children from poor rural or marginalized urban communities. International Handbook of Research on Children’s Literacy, Learning, and Culture, 67-82.

Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. En: D.G. Bobrow, y A. Collins (Eds.) Representation and understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science. (pp. 211-236). New York: Academic Press.

Sawyer, R. K. (2002). Improvisation and narrative. Narrative inquiry, 12(2), 319-349.

Stam, G., y Ishino, M. (Eds) (2011). Integrating gestures: The interdisciplinary nature of gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Stein, A., y Migdalek, M. J. (2017). The Construction of the Fictional World and the Narrative Structure in Symbolic Play Situations in Home Settings. Actualidades en Psicología, 31(122), 2-15.

Stein, A., & Rosemberg, C. R. (2012). Redes de colaboración en situaciones de alfabetización con niños pequeños: un estudio en poblaciones urbano marginales de Argentina. Interdisciplinaria, 29(1), 95-108.

Stein, S. y Glenn, G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. En: R. Freedle (Ed.), New Directions in Discourse Processes (pp. 53-120). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.

Véliz, M. (1998). Evaluación de la madurez sintáctica en el discurso escrito, RLA, 26, 105-141.

Stern, D. N. (1991). El mundo interpersonal del infante. Una perspectiva desde el psicoanálisis y la psicología del desarrollo. Buenos Aires: Paidós. [Ed. orig.: The Interpersonal World of the Child. A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology, Nueva York, Basic Books, 1985.]

Tomasello, M. (2007). Los orígenes culturales de la cognición humana. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu. [Ed. orig.: The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press, 1999.]

Published
2020-08-28
How to Cite
Alam, F., Rosemberg, C. R., & Scheuer, N. (2020). Gestos y habla en la construcción infantil de narrativas entre pares. Cuadernos Del Centro De Estudios De Diseño Y Comunicación, (89). https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi89.3807