Estratégias de Resistência dos Artefatos Políticos de Zuzu Angel
Resumo
In the 1970s, thestylist / designer Zuzu Angel was committed to the defense of democracy through her creations. After the murder of he son Stuart Angel by the Brazilian military dictatorship (1964-1985), she initiated critical interventions in order to denounce the violence of the State. To this end, she designed collections representing the conflicts and the torture used by the military regime against political prisoners. In 1971, she held a show narrating, through prints, embroidery and texts, testimonies of contemporary Brazilian history. The dress entitled Anjo became the iconic piece of the collection in which she embroidered a visual narrative denouncing the necropolitics. From this creation, we will analyze the political artifact, starting from Winner’s research (1980) in order to propose a correspondence with Critical Design. Following the notions presented by Dunne and Raby, we will analyze political action and critical thinking in design. In thisr egard, we will dwell on the sense of politics by authors such as Arendt (2002), Benjamin (2012) and Bensaïd (2008). Finally, we will present the analysis by Disalvo (2012) and Mouffe (2000) regarding Adverse Design and the sense of agonism. The proposal is to think about how the projects in Design and Fashion by Zuzu Angel were transformed into a political confrontation, being a resistance to the Brazilian military dictatorship. We will investigate how fashion style enabled her design work to subvert guidelines on usability and function. Through the conceptual field, Zuzu Angel also approached artistic interventions, performing feelings such as loss, pain and silence.
Referências
Arendt, H. (2002). O que é o política? Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil.
Benjamin, W. (2012). O anjo da história. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.
Bensaïd, D. (2008).Penser, Agir. Clamecy: Lignes
Bernward, J. (2012). Do Politics have Artefacts, Social Studies of Science, ISSN 1460-3659, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Vol. 29, Iss. 3, pp. 411-431.
Braga, João (2014). Eu sou a moda brasileira. São Paulo: Itaú Cultural.
Dunne, A.; Raby F. (1997) Hertzian Tales 1994–1997. In: http://www.dunneandraby.co.uk/content/projects/67/0
DiSalvo, C. (2012). Adversarial Design. London: The MIT Press.
Gagnebin, J. M. (1997). Linguagem, Memória e História. São Paulo: Imago.
Groys, B. (2015). Arte Poder. Belo Horizonte: Ed. UFMG.
Latour, B. (2004). PoliticsofNature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lausen, M.(2007). Design for Democracy: Ballotand Election Design. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Manzini, E.; Margolin, V. (2017).Open Letter to the Design Community: Stand Up for Democracy. In:http://www.democracy-design.org/open-letter-stand-up-democracy/
Mbembe, A. (2018). Necropolítica. São Paulo: M-1.
Mouffe, C. 2000. Deliberative Democracyor Agonistic Pluralism. Vienna: Department of Political Science, Institute for AdvancedStudies (IHS).
Quinz, Emanuele (2014). “Objets et Stratégiesdu design Conceptuel.” Strange Design: Du Design des Objetsau Design des Comportaments. Paris: Diffusion.
Schwarcz, L.; Starling, H. (2015). Brasil uma Biografia. São Paulo: Cia das Letras.
Tocqueville, A. (1967). L’Ancien Régime et laRévolution. Paris: Gallimard.
Winner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus 109 (1): 121–136.
Zuleika (2014). São Paulo: Itaú Cultural. Nº1, ano 1, abril, p.33 – 63.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista ceden los derechos de autor y de publicación a "Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación", Aceptando el registro de su trabajo bajo una licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que de el crédito pertinente a los autores y a esta revista.