The study of the character strengths in children: Relations with the psychological well-being, social desirability and personality
Abstract
This study aimed to verify the existence of associations between character strengths, psychological welfare, social desirability and personality in children of 10 to12 years old. 518 children (254 boys and 263 girls) between 10 and 12 years old and attending public and private schools in the City of Buenos Aires (Argentina) participated on this study. The following were administered: a socio–demographic survey; a survey to assess the PERMA ́s access to welfare theory five elements, the Virtues and Strengths Inventory for Children; Children’s Personality Questionnaire and Children’s Social Desirability Scale. The results showed that, as in previous studies, vitality, hope and curiosity were the strengths most associated with life satisfaction. At the same time, statistically significant correlations between the PERMA ́s access to welfare theory five elements (Seligman, 2011) and most of the character ́s strengths were found. Meanwhile, the strengths were also found associated with the Five Great Personality Factors model and social desirability. Finally, differences in the presence of the character strengths according to sex and age were found.
Downloads
References
Brdar, I., Anić, P. & Rijavec, M. (2011). Character Strengths and Well–Being: Are There Gender Differences? En I. Brdar (Ed.), The Human Pursuit of Well- Being: A Cultural Approach (pp. 145–156). New York: Springer.
Brdar, I. & Kashdan, T. B. (2010). Character strengths and well–being in Croatia: An empirical investigation of structure and correlates. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(1), 151–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.12.001
Buschor, C., Proyer, R. T. & Ruch, W. (2013). Self–and peer–rated character strengths: How do they relate to satisfaction with life and orientations to happiness? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(2), 116–127.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. & Rodgers, W. (1976). The quality of life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Sage.
Castro Solano, A. (2010). Concepciones teóricas acerca de la Psicología Positiva. En A. Castro Solano (Comp.), Fundamentos de Psicología Positiva (pp. 17– 41). Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Clemente, A. (1996). Psicología del Desarrollo Adulto. Madrid: Narcea.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Cosentino, A. (2010). Las fortalezas del carácter. En A. Castro Solano (Ed.), Fundamentos de Psicología Positiva (pp. 111–135). Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective wellbeing: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 668–678. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.668
Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1991). NEO PI–R. Professional manual. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI–R) and NEO five–factor inventory (NEO–FFI). USA: Psychological Assesment Resources, Inc.
Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1998). Estados de ánimo y personalidad en la etapa adulta. En M. P. Sánchez López & M. A. Quiroga Estévez (Eds), Perspectivas actuales en la investigación psicológica de las diferencias individuales (pp. 295–310). Madrid: Editorial Centro de Estudios Ramón Areces SA.
Costa, P. T. Jr., McCrae, R. R. & Martin, T. A. (2008). Incipient adult personality: The NEO–PI–3 in middle–school–aged children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26(1), 71–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/026151007X196273
Fernandez–Ballesteros, R. (1997). Calidad de vida en la vejez: Condiciones diferenciales. Intervención psicosocial, 6(1), 21–35.
García de León, M. A., García de Cortaza, M. & Ortega, F. (1996). Sociología de las mujeres españolas. Madrid: Complutense.
Gillham, J., Adams–Deutsch, Z., Werner, J., Reivich, K., Coulter–Heindl, V., Linkins, M. & Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Character strengths predict subjective well–being during adolescence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(1), 31–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2010.536773
Giménez, M. (2010). La medida de las fortalezas psicológicas en adolescentes (VIAY): relación con clima familiar, psicopatología y bienestar psicológico. Tesis doctoral no publicada, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, España.
Grinhauz, A. & Castro Solano, A. (2014). Validez factorial del Inventario de Virtudes y Fortalezas Para Niños (IVyF NIÑOS). Anuario de Investigaciones, 20(1), 357–361.
Hong, S. M. & Giannakopoulus E. (1994). The relationship of satisfaction with life to personality characteristics. The Journal of Psychology, 128(5), 547–558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1994.9914912
Klemmack, D. L. & Roff, L. L. (1984). Fear of personal aging and subjective well–being in later life. Journal of Gerontology, 39, 356–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronj/39.6.756
Lambert, N. M., Fincham, F. D., Gwinn, A. M. & Ajayi, C. A. (2011). Positive relationship science: A new frontier for positive psychology? En K. M. Sheldon, T.B. Kashdan & M. F. Steger (Eds.), Designing Positive Psychology: taking stock and moving forward (pp. 280–292). Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Lampropoulos, G. K. (2001). Integrating Psychopathology, Positive Psychology and Psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 56(1), 87–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.1.87
Lemos, V. (2004). Operacionalización del constructo personalidad infantil a partir del enfoque de los Cinco Grandes Factores de Personalidad. Tesis Doctoral para optar por el título de Doctor en Psicología. Universidad Nacional de San Luis.
Lemos, V. (2005). Construcción y validación de una Escala para la Evaluación de la Deseabilidad Social Infantil (EDESI). Interdisciplinaria, 22(1), 79–96.
Lemos, V. (2006). La evaluación de la personalidad infantil a partir del enfoque de los cinco grandes factores de personalidad (Big Five). Psicodiagnosticar, 16, 97–108.
Lerner, R. M. (1998). Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (Vol. 1). New York : Wiley.
Lewinson, P. M., Redner, J. E. & Seeley, J. R. (1991). The relationship between life satisfaction and psychosocial variables: New perspectives. En F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well–being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 141–169). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M., Joseph, S., Harrington, S., Peterson, C., ... Seligman, M. E. P. (2007). Character strengths in the United Kingdom: The VIA Inventory of Strengths. Personality and individual differences, 43, 341–351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.004
Littman–Ovadia, H. & Lavy, S. (2012). Character strengths in Israel: Hebrew adaptation of the VIA Inventory of Strengths. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 41–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000089
Luthar S. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2000). The construct of resilience: Implications for interventions and social policies. Development and psychopathology, 12, 857–885. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400004156
McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. (1988). Recalled parent–child relations and adult personality. Journal of Personality, 56, 417–434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1988.tb00894.x
Morganti, J. B., Nehrke, M. F., Hulicka, I. M. & Cataldo, J. F. (1988). Life–span differences in life satisfaction, selfconcept, and locus of control. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 26, 45–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/HDAD-XT0C-W8JB-63DR
Ovejero, M. & Cardenal, V. (2011, julio). Character strengths with gender perspective. A study with a Spanish sample. Trabajo presentado en Second World Congress on Positive Psychology. Philadelphia, Estados Unidos
Park, N. (2004). Character strengths and positive youth development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 40–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716203260079
Park, N. & Peterson, C. (2003, marzo). Assessment of character strengths among youth: The Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth. Conferencia presentada en Indicators of Positive Development Conference, Washington, Estados Unidos.
Park, N. & Peterson, C. (2006a). Character Strengths and happiness among young children: Content analysis of parental descriptions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 323–341.
Park, N. & Peterson, C. (2006b). Moral competence and character strenghts among adolescents: the development and validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strenghts for Youth. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 891–909.
Park, N., Peterson, C. & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Strengths of character and well–being. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 23, 603–619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.5.603.50748
Peña, D. (2002). Análisis de Datos Multivariantes. Madrid: McGraw–Hill.
Peterson, C. & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Open Mindedness. Judgment, Critical Thinking. En C. Peterson y M.E.P. Seligman (Eds.). Character strengths and virtues: a handbook and classification (pp. 143–159). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association and Oxford University Press.
Quiroga Estévez, M. A. & Sánchez López, M. P. (1995). Relaciones entre satisfacción familiar y laboral: Variables moduladoras. Anales de Psicología, 11(1), 65–78.
Ruch, W., Huber, A., Beermann, U. & Proyer, R. T. (2007). Character strengths as predictors of the “good life” in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. En Romanian Academy, “George Barit” Institute of History, Department of Social Research (Ed.), Studies and researches in social sciences (Vol. 16, pp. 123–131). Cluj–Napoca, Romania: Argonaut Press.
Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., Harzer, C., Park, N., Peterson, C. & Seligman, M. E. (2010). Values in action inventory of strengths (VIA–IS). Journal of Individual Differences, 31(3), 138–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000022
Ruch, W., Weber, M., Park, N. & Peterson, C. (2014). Character strengths in children and adolescents: Reliability and initial validity of the German Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth (German VIA–Youth). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(1), 57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000169
Ryff, C. D. & Keyes, C. (1995). The structure of psychological well–being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new Positive Psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Free Press.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2009). Special Lecture. Documento presentado en Primer Congreso Mundial de Psicología Positiva. International Positive Psychology Association, Filadelfia, Pensilvania, Estados Unidos.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well–being. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Seligman, M. E. P. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive Psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 5 –14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
Seligman, M. E. P., Parks, A. C. & Steen, T. (2006). A balanced psychology and a full life. En H. Huppert, B. Keverne & N. Baylis (Eds.), The science of well– being. Oxford: University Press.
Shimai, S., Otake, K., Park, N., Peterson, C. & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Convergence of character strengths in American and Japanese Young Adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 311–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-005-3647-7
Shmotkin, D. (1990). Subjective well–being as a function of age and gender: A multivariate look for differentiated trends. Social Indicators Research, 23, 201–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00293643
Steger, M. F. (2009). Meaning in life. En S. J. S. C. R. Lopez (Ed.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 679–687). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Terjesen, M. D. Jacofsky, M. Froh, J. & DiGiuseppe, R. (2004). Integrating Positive Psychology into schools: Implications for practice. Psychology in the Schools, 41(1), 163–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.10148
Veroff, J., Douvan, E. & Kulka, K. (1981). The inner American. New York: Basic Books.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to grant Psicodebate copyright and right of publication and accept the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authors and Psicodebate.
