Social Representations of Intelligence
Abstract
The article stresses the relationship between Explicit and Implicit theories of Intelligence. Following the line of common sense epistemology and the theory of Social Representations, a study was carried out in order to analyze naive’s explanations about Intelligence Definitions. Based on Mugny & Carugati (1989) research, a self-administered questionnaire was designed and filled in by 286 subjects. Results are congruent with the main hyphotesis postulated: A general overlap between explicit and implicit theories showed up. According to the results Intelligence appears as both, a social attribute related to social adaptation and as a concept defined in relation with contextual variables similar to expert’s current discourses. Nevertheless, conceptions based on “gifted ideology” still are present stressing the main axes of Intelligence debate: biological and sociological determinism. In the same sense, unfamiliarity and social identity are reaffirmed as organizing principles of social representation. The distance with the object -measured as the belief in intelligence differences as a solve/non solve problem- and the level of implication with the topic -teachers/no teachers- appear as discriminating elements at the moment of supporting specific dimensions.
Downloads
References
Agoustinos, M. & Innes, J.M. (1990). Towards an integration of social representations and social schema theory, British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 213-231.
Amaral, V. (1997). A Inteligência e o seu desenvolvimento: Representacoes sociais e identidades sociais. En M.B Monteiro, P. Castro (eds), Cada CabeÇa sua SentenÇa: Ideias dos adultos sobre as crianÇas. Oeiras: Celta Editora.
Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J.C. (1981). La Reproduccion. Barcelona, Edit. Paidós.
Carugati, F (1990). From social cognition to social representations in the study of intelligence. En G. Duveen & B, Lloyd (De.), Social Representations and the development of knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Doise, W. & Mugny, G. (1997). Psychologie Sociale & développement cognitif. Paris: Armand Colin.
Doise, W. Clemence, A. & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1993). The Quantitative Analysis of Social Representations. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Faria, L. & Fontaine, A. M. (1994). Teacher ́s Social Representations of Intelligence: an exploratory study with Portugese Teachers. En A. Clemente, G. Musitu, E. Gutierrez (Eds.), Intervención Educativa é Desarrollo Humano (pp 29-38). Valencia: Seti Set Edic.
Flament, C. (1987). Pratiques et Représentations Sociales. En J.L Beavois, R.V. Joule, J.M. Monteil (Eds.). Théories Implicites et Conflicts Cognitifs. (pp 143-150). Cousset: DelVal.
Farr, R. (1987). Social Representations: a French Tradition of Research. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviuor, 17, 343-369.
Fraser, C. (1994). Attitudes, Social Representations and Widespread Beliefs. Papers on Social Representations, Vol. 3, 13-25.
Gardner, H. (1984). The development of competence in culturally defined domains. En Richard A.S. & R. A. Levine (Eds.) Culture Theory. Essays on Mind, Self and Emotions. Boston: Cambridge University Press.
Gardner, H. (1994). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. En Teachers College Record, Vol. 95, No4, 557-583.
Jodelet, D. (1988). La Representación Social: Fenómenos, Concepto y Teoría. En Moscovici, S. (Ed), Psicología Social, Pensamiento y vida social. Psicología social y Problemas Sociales. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Moscovici, S. & Hewstone, M. (1988). De la Ciencia al Sentido Común. En Moscovici, S. (Ed), Psicología Social, Pensamiento y vida social. Psicología social y Problemas Sociales. Buenos Aires, Editorial Paidós.
Moscovici, S. (1961). Le Psychoanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: PUF.
Moscovici, S. (1981). On Social Representations, En J.P Forgas (Ed.), Social Cognition: Perspectives in everyday understanding. Londres: Academic Press.
Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of Social Representations. En Farr, R. & Moscovici, S. (Eds.), Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mugny, G. & Carugati, F. (1989); Social Representations of Intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mugny, G. & Doise, W. (1985). La Construcción Social de la Inteligencia. México: Trillas.
Poeschl, G. & Doise, W. (1993). Intelligence of the self and human intelligence in general: A “superior conformity of the self” effect? En J. Piolat, M. F. Pichevin, M.C. Hurtig (Eds.), Studies on the self and social cognition. Singapur: World Scientific Publishing Co.
Richardson, K. (1994). Understanding Intelligence. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Semin, G. R. (1987). On the relationships between representations of theories in psychology and oridinary language. En Doise, W. & Moscovici, S. (Eds), Current Issues in European Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stemberg, R. & Detterman, D. (1988). ¿Qué es la Inteligencia? Enfoque actual de su naturaleza y definición. Madrid: Pirámide.
Sternberg, R. (1985). Implicit Theories of Intelligence, Creativity and Wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607-27.
Sternberg, R. & Kauffman, J. D. (1998). Human Habilities. Annual Review Psychology, 49, 479-502.
Sternberg, R.; Conway, B., Ketron, J. & Bernstein, M.; (1981). People’s conception of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607-27.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to grant Psicodebate copyright and right of publication and accept the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the authors and Psicodebate.
