UNCLOS and territorialization of the seas: the case of Indian and Pacific Oceans
Resumen
The 200-nautical-mile Exclusive Economic Zone created by the 1982 UNCLOS regime generates conflict in areas where the distance between opposite national coasts is less than 400 nautical miles and in marginal seas surrounded by many states and with islands. This is the case of the marginal seas in the Indian and Pacific Oceans. In particular, the EEZ regime has proved troublesome in the South China Sea, leading some authors to ask whether it has actually strengthened or undermined peace and cooperation. Does the problem really lie with UNCLOS? My purpose hereby is to explain that, in truth, UNCLOS is a milestone in the process of territorialization of the seas. The EEZ regime represents the balance between the opposing pressures coming from the coastal States and the third states, generally the maritime powers; however, and in spite of the fact that, pursuant to LOS Convention, coastal States enjoy sovereign rights and not sovereignty in the EEZ, it will be argued here that coastal States do in practice behave with respect to their EEZs as if they were their own sovereign territory. This is particularly true of the contentious areas of the Indian and Pacific Oceans.Descargas
Citas
Abedin, M. (2004, December 9). All at sea over the "Gulf". Asia Times.
Arora, R. (2015, September 26). Modi government's Rs 10,000 crore plan to transform Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The Economic Times.
Beckman, R. (2013). The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea. The American Journal of International Law, 107(142), 142-163.
Beckman, R., & Davenport, T. (2012). The EEZ Regime: Reflections after 30 Years. LOSI Conference Papers.
Bo, H. (2015, November 17). The Hypocrisy of US Freedom of Navigation Operations in the South China Sea. The Diplomat.
Bosworth, C. E. (1980). The Nomenclature of the Persian Gulf. In A. J. Cottrell (Ed.), The Persian Gulf States: A General Survey. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cole, B. D. (2008). Sea Lanes and Pipelines: Energy Security in Asia. Westport CT: Praeger Security International.
Gady, F.-S. (2015a, August 6). Vietnam Commissions Two New Subs Capable of Attacking China. The Diplomat.
Gady, F.-S. (2015b, December 28). Vietnam Reveals New Drone for Patrolling the South China Sea. The Diplomat.
Kaul, S. (2015). Andaman and Nicobar Islands. India’s Untapped Strategic Assets. New Delhi: Pentagon Press. Institute for Defence Studies & Analysis.
Klein, A., & Rapp-Hooper, M. (2015, October 23). Freedom of Navigation Operatoins in the South China Sea: What to Watch For. Lawfare.
Kopela, S. (2009, April 1-3). The "territorialisation" of the Exclusive Economic Zone: Implications for maritime jurisdiction. Paper presented at the 20th Anniversary Conference of the International Boundaries Research Unit on the State of Sovereignty, Durham University, United Kingdom.
Kuzmits, B. (2013). Borders and Orders in Central Asia. Transactions and Attitudes between Afghanistan, Tajikistan and Afghanistan. Nomos.
Lean Collin, K. S. (2015, August 18). Tough Times Ahead for the Indonesian Navy. The Diplomat.
Odom, J. G. (2015, October 31). Why US FON Operations in the South China Sea Make Sense. The Diplomat.
Oxman, B. H. (2006, October). The Territorial Temptation: A Siren Song at Sea. The American Journal of International Law, 100(4), 830-851.
Panda, A. (2016, January 3). Vietnam Protests as China Lands Civilian Aircraft on Newly Constructed Spratly Airstrip. The Diplomat.
Pandit, R. (2015, May 7). India to slowly but steadily boost military presence in Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The Times of India.
Parameswaran, P. (2015a, August 15). Japan Gifts Vietnam Patrol Vessel Amid South China Sea Tensions. The Diplomat.
Parameswaran, P. (2015b, September 8). US to Deliver Four New Patrol Vessels to the Philippines. The Diplomat.
Quismundo, T. (2011, June 13). South China Sea renamed in the Philippines. Asia One News.
Rapp-Hooper, M. (2015, October 12). All in Good FON. Foreign Affairs.
Roy, V. C. (2015, October 5). Indian islands to be developed under Swiss challenge model. Business Standard.
Rumley, D., Doyle, T., & Chaturvedi, S. (2012, April). Securing the Indian Ocean? Competing Regional Security Constructions. Indo-Pacific Governance Research Centre. Policy Brief(3).
Shi, X. (2015, October). UNCLOS and China's Claim in the South China Sea. Indo-Pacific Strategic Papers.
Singh, A. (2015, December 28). India's Emerging Indian Ocean Strategy. The Diplomat.
Smith, J. M. (2014, 18 March). Andaman and Nicobar Islands: India’s Strategic Outpost . The Diplomat.
Song, Y.-h., & Tønnesson, S. (2013). The Impact of the Law of the Sea Convention on Conflict and Conflict Management in the South China Sea. Ocean Development & International Law, 44(3), 235-269.
The Issue of the Name of the Sea of Japan. (2015, May 15). Retrieved from Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan: http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/maritime/japan/index.html
Tiezzi, S. (2016, January 1). Confirmed: China is Building a Second Aircraft Carrier. The Diplomat.
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. (1982).
Watson, S. (2015, November 16). Will India Truly Start “Acting East” in Andaman and Nicobar? Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative.
Widodo, J. (2014, November 14). The seas should unite, not separate us. The Jakarta Post.
Los autores conservan los derechos sobre su obra garantizando a esta revista el derecho de primera publicación, comprometiéndose a citar el Journal de Ciencias Sociales como referencia de la publicación original.
Los trabajos publicados en el Journal se publican bajo los términos que se indican en la Licencia de Creative Commons con la Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
