A discussion on the role of the International Organizations in the International Relations theory

  • Juan Facundo Carcedo Centro de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Problemáticas Internacionales y Locales (CEIPIL/CIC/UNICEN) - Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNICEN) - Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires.
Keywords: organizations, international, theory, relations.

Abstract

The article has as main objective to evidence the different approaches from the International Relations discipline that permit to study the international organizations. In this sense, first the article defines and characterizes the international organizations, as well as a differentiation from the term international institutions. Second, those researches published in the last years related to the issue of this paper are being exposed in the discussion section given account of the efforts made around the globe to inquire into this subject. Third, the article analyses the role played by the international organizations in the IR discipline, specifically from theories such as, realism and neo-realism, liberalism, neoliberal institutionalism and complex interdependence, constructivism, and others theoretical contributions (like the critical theory, the functionalism and neo-functionalism, the principal and agent, and the feminist theory). Finally yet importantly, final reflections are being presented. Thus, the paper studies an international actor considered by the most state-centric authors as non-traditional in the IR, such as the international organizations, which from mid-20th century have increased its presence in the international system, with currently relations with national and sub-national governments and reaching a huge variety of issues.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Juan Facundo Carcedo, Centro de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Problemáticas Internacionales y Locales (CEIPIL/CIC/UNICEN) - Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNICEN) - Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires.

Lic. en Relaciones Internacionales (FCH-UNICEN). Maestrando en Integración y Cooperación Internacional (CERIR/CEI-UNR). Estudiante de Doctorado en Relaciones Internacionales (UNR). Becario de la Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (CICPBA). Miembro de la planta estable de investigadores del Centro de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Problemáticas Internacionales y Locales (CEIPIL/CICPBA) de la Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNICEN)

References

Andreev, A. (2007). To what extent are international organizations (IOs) autonomous actors in world politics? Opticon1826, 2, 1-8.

Ayllón, B. (2007). La Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo: fundamento y justificaciones en la perspectiva de la Teoría de las Relaciones Internacionales. Carta Internacional, 2(2), 25-40.

Barbé, E. (1995). Relaciones Internacionales. Madrid: Tecnos.

Barkin, J. S. (2006). International Organization: Theories and Institutions. New York: Macmillan.

Barnett, M. y Finnemore, M. (1999). The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization, 53(4), 699-732.

Barnett, M. y Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Barrea, J. (1991). Théories des Relations Internationales. París: CIAO.

Bayeh, E. (2014). Theories on the role of international organizations in maintaining peace and security. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 1(7), 347-350.

Béland, D. y Orenstein, M. (2013). International organizations as policy actors: An ideational approach. Global Social Policy. 13(2), 125-143.

Burchill, S. (2005). Liberalism. En S. Burchill et al (2005).Theories of International Relations. (Pp. 55-83). Nueva York: Macmillan.

Cox, R. (1983). Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: an essay in method. Journal of International Studies, 12(2), 162-175.

Cox, R. (2001). The Way Ahead: Towards a New Ontology of World Order. En R. Wyn Jones, Critical Theory and World Politics. (pp. 45-60). Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

De Almeida Freitas Lacerda, J. (2013). O papel das ideias e das Organizações Internacionais nas Teorias das Relações Internacionais. Revista de Estudos Internacionais, 4(1), 83-99.

Diez de Velasco, M. (1997): Instituciones de Derecho Internacional Público. España: Tecnos.

Duffield, J. (2007). What are International Institutions? International Studies Review, 9(1), 1-22.

Finnemore, M. y Sikkink, K. (2001). Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 391-416.

Gramsci, A. (1971): Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.

Hawkins, D. et al (2006): Delegation and Agency in International Organizations (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Herz, M. y Hoffmann, A. (2004): Organizações Internacionais: História e Práticas. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.

Hurtado Hurtado, J. (2014). Feminismo y organizaciones internacionales, ¿cambio o continuidad en las estructuras de poder? Revista Mito Cultural, 44 (n/d).

Jiménez González, C. (2003). Las teorías de la cooperación internacional dentro de las relaciones internacionales. Polis, 2(3), 115-147.

Keohane, R. (1993). Instituciones internacionales y poder estatal. Ensayos sobre teoría de las relaciones internacionales. Argentina: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.

Keohane, R. y Nye, J. (1988). Poder e interdependencia. La política mundial en transición. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.

Kratochwil, F. (1989). Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Malamud, A. (2011). Conceptos, teorías y debates sobre la integración regional. Norteamérica, 6(2), 219-249.

Mearsheimer, J. (1994/95). The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5-49.

Meierhenrich, J. (2012). International Organizations. Londres: London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).

Mitrany, D. (1943). A working peace system. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.

Onuf, N. (1989). World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations (New International Relations). Londres: Routledge.

Pinto, M. (2007). Contributos das teorías das RI para o estudo das organizações internacionais e da integração regional. Relações Internacionais, 16(n/d), 85-101.

Reinalda, B. y Verbeek, B. (2004). Decision Making Within International Organizations. Londres: Routledge.

Risse, T. (2002). Constructivism and International Institutions: toward conversations across Paradigms. En I. Katznelson y H. Milner (Eds.). Political Science: The State of the Discipline. (pp. 597-623). Nueva York: Norton.

Rodríguez Manzano, I. (1996). Funcionalismo, Neofuncionalismo y Relaciones Internacionales. Dos contribuciones doctrinales al estudio de las organizaciones internacionales. Dereito, 5(1), 289-303.

Sinclair A. y Byers M. (2006). When US Scholars Speak of “Sovereignty”, What Do They Mean? TranState Working Papers, 44(n/d), 1-26.

Waltz, K. (2000). Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5-41.

Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what States make of it: the Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425.

Zamudio González, L. (2012). Introducción al Estudio de las organizaciones internacionales gubernamentales: la pertinencia de una agenda de investigación interdisciplinaria. México: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económica.

Published
2019-04-25
How to Cite
Carcedo, J. F. (2019). A discussion on the role of the International Organizations in the International Relations theory. Journal De Ciencias Sociales, (12). https://doi.org/10.18682/jcs.v0i12.914